@DankDorito No, he knows what im saying is true, its like saying, your house is missing a window, and I tell him that, and then he says, "oh my house does not need a windows because [excuse] "
@MemeKingIndustriesAndMegaCorporation Now I see my PilotMario always called you salty, and for sure you are OP in this RP, you cannot admit your weaknesses, a true weakness, online, and in real life, when you do accept that your designs are not the best in the planet, and admit that you do have faults, you will truly become a good person.
@MemeKingIndustriesAndMegaCorporation Yould like me to reprove all my points right? Sure I would not really call a piston over a block a "suspension system",and next time be sure to list controls of your vehicles. With the piston extended, the tank was very high profile, higher than it originally was, enabling it snipe over hills, but it maneuverability was sacrificed, as when turning 50% of the time the machine would flip over, and as you said there is no crew in the turret, and I guess only one driver, a man cannot push a 127,015lb tank. Also, with the piston extended, a machine gun or grenade can hit it and blow it up, causing one of the track chains to be broken, and only allowing the machine to act as a pillbox. Gun jamming is caused by two guns, close to each other, when firing the heat causes by the gun will wear down the machines barrel and inside, like normal tanks, but two guns will speed up the process, especially two large guns close to each other. If the turret is electronically controlled, with no crew, a single shot into the turret should take it out, and disable the turret from working, if not a portable EMP, or a portable hacking device should be able to hack it, and again disable it. Im pretty sure cloaking might hide the tank, but not its tracks, or the sound of the machine, or shells its firing or even the smoke produced by the engine. Cameras are cute, so show your nation how easily their tanks are destroyed. You have NO excuse to say "oh it was too complex to add rotating turrets" your on Android and Windows as I can see from your uploaded planes, you have access to Fine Tuner on Android, and Nudge and Fine Tuner on Windows, NO excuse to not having the smaller turrets moving. Still, the space between the hull and turret, is a easy weak spot, to allow the destruction of the turret or hull by the tank shell destroying the small space in between, or allowing the shell to bounce off the small pierce of metal connecting the hull and turret, into the flat underside of the turret and disabling it by smashing all electronics inside with shrapnel, and the hull by probably killing the driver, or destroying the engine. Check yourself before you wreck yourself.
@MemeKingIndustriesAndMegaCorporation The M.P.A.V 'Khalid' MK3.5 "Kingslayer" is not a conventional design, trying to hide the lower glacis with thick side skirts all around the tank, it also have small tracks, with high ground clearance. It is supposed that it will get stuck on small rocks between the wheeled tracks, unable to get it out of the machines thick side skirts. It has good maneuverability, but a major weakness the coaxial and smaller machine gun turrets do not move. Gun jamming is also common thanks to the dual cannon set up, and a small cramped turret, of having at least 2 loads, a commander, and 2 gunners all cramped in a small turret. It has strong sloped armor, but a weakness in the turret ring, a small barley sloped ring, that can be shot at to disable the turret ring, and then to flank around the tank and kill it from the sides and back. also it has very poor visibility as only the driver can clearly see out of the tank. Also a giant flag and lights all around the tank make it very easy to spot.
@PINK Much more superior, whilst not having an impossible amount of armor with no engine in the world to move the hunk of a more than likely fake element, it is much superior due to its conventional design and armament, it can cross ditches thanks to the tracks covering the front of the tank, a machine gun on the top to fire at planes/troops, a coaxial, and a proper cannon. It also has sloped armor for bouncing shells, its only weakness is its lack of side skirts and visibility.
@TheBroadside We have tested the "Objector" tank, it has a ok top speed of 60mph, and ok handling, but its tracks are so far back that it cannot traverse trough ditches, and is also prone to slipping. The two main guns are prone to jamming when gas from the other gun is taken in from the other. It also lacks a coaxial, and the two machine guns in the hull can only shoot forwards and cannot traverse. Gun traverse was also slow horizontally, but vertically it was very fast, too fast as the barrel itself would jam. Armor is also thick, but it is flat so a regular APDS can penetrate it with ease, the turret is also very weak, having mostly flat armor. Maintenance is easy as it is a rather simple machine. Constant firing from both cannons also cause a lot of smoke, and recoil to the chassis and turret, reducing service life.
Love these trucks
lol rip
@FuryionAircraft yea but if your on Windows 10 go to PC and look for locallow, it's faster.
rekt
@Zerokiller3 Yep, flies like one too.
@Gmanndo1000 Maybe, we know they left, but if they made it is unknown, who knows, once the war is over this little car might be on display.
wow not even 1:1 you should check out that new F-18 that guy made with the awesome paint
@cowelly Yea they were really nice, I got right in the window seat I could see the flaps and engines. The food was not even that bad.
I flew in one if these. I even made a not so good one :p
AERO WAS HERE
Credit for my steering wheel please. Also nice golf very cute.
Ive been playing War Thunder for quite some time, I play all nations tanks and planes.
@CODENAMEBOB Sure. Just give credit.
For me the golden time was 3pm Est USA time
@Supercraft888 Not really a successor, I will upload a successor soon, but for now just use this one.
@kukimuki1234 Kebab is the people who broke Yugoslavia:
Powerful Kebab Remover
@kukimuki1234 Make this out of wood, go to local wood mill and ask for extra wood, worst quality, find blueprints on internet and make.
Remove Kebab!
upload los track mod plz
@SimpleTechAndResearch Better yet, add a limit to how many people can join you.
Love this plane in real life, and in FSX, it was the first plane that I flew and it was so awesome.
@KingDeadshot It's just a hurricane nothing big.
Your not gonna die, It's gonna hit me to, it's nothing compared to Andrew and Catrina
@MemeKingIndustriesAndMegaCorporation I did not want to criticize it, as you where the one to link me to it, after I reviewed TheBroadside's Objector.
@GoldenEagle Sorry owner, im just not very fond of people will a huge ego, and a tendency to get salty.
Turn on the light, and yea the dark is scary, I always have my TV on when I am sleeping, just for the comforting sound of other people and sound.
@DankDorito No, he knows what im saying is true, its like saying, your house is missing a window, and I tell him that, and then he says, "oh my house does not need a windows because [excuse] "
@MemeKingIndustriesAndMegaCorporation Now I see my PilotMario always called you salty, and for sure you are OP in this RP, you cannot admit your weaknesses, a true weakness, online, and in real life, when you do accept that your designs are not the best in the planet, and admit that you do have faults, you will truly become a good person.
@MemeKingIndustriesAndMegaCorporation Well versing a 1st world tank, it does pretty good considering, I am a 3rd world nation.
@MemeKingIndustriesAndMegaCorporation Yould like me to reprove all my points right? Sure I would not really call a piston over a block a "suspension system",and next time be sure to list controls of your vehicles. With the piston extended, the tank was very high profile, higher than it originally was, enabling it snipe over hills, but it maneuverability was sacrificed, as when turning 50% of the time the machine would flip over, and as you said there is no crew in the turret, and I guess only one driver, a man cannot push a 127,015lb tank. Also, with the piston extended, a machine gun or grenade can hit it and blow it up, causing one of the track chains to be broken, and only allowing the machine to act as a pillbox. Gun jamming is caused by two guns, close to each other, when firing the heat causes by the gun will wear down the machines barrel and inside, like normal tanks, but two guns will speed up the process, especially two large guns close to each other. If the turret is electronically controlled, with no crew, a single shot into the turret should take it out, and disable the turret from working, if not a portable EMP, or a portable hacking device should be able to hack it, and again disable it. Im pretty sure cloaking might hide the tank, but not its tracks, or the sound of the machine, or shells its firing or even the smoke produced by the engine. Cameras are cute, so show your nation how easily their tanks are destroyed. You have NO excuse to say "oh it was too complex to add rotating turrets" your on Android and Windows as I can see from your uploaded planes, you have access to Fine Tuner on Android, and Nudge and Fine Tuner on Windows, NO excuse to not having the smaller turrets moving. Still, the space between the hull and turret, is a easy weak spot, to allow the destruction of the turret or hull by the tank shell destroying the small space in between, or allowing the shell to bounce off the small pierce of metal connecting the hull and turret, into the flat underside of the turret and disabling it by smashing all electronics inside with shrapnel, and the hull by probably killing the driver, or destroying the engine. Check yourself before you wreck yourself.
Cheeki Breeki Danke axaxaxxaxaxa)))))))
@PINK Its not going to be a 100% replica, but it will resemble a more modernized version.
@MemeKingIndustriesAndMegaCorporation The M.P.A.V 'Khalid' MK3.5 "Kingslayer" is not a conventional design, trying to hide the lower glacis with thick side skirts all around the tank, it also have small tracks, with high ground clearance. It is supposed that it will get stuck on small rocks between the wheeled tracks, unable to get it out of the machines thick side skirts. It has good maneuverability, but a major weakness the coaxial and smaller machine gun turrets do not move. Gun jamming is also common thanks to the dual cannon set up, and a small cramped turret, of having at least 2 loads, a commander, and 2 gunners all cramped in a small turret. It has strong sloped armor, but a weakness in the turret ring, a small barley sloped ring, that can be shot at to disable the turret ring, and then to flank around the tank and kill it from the sides and back. also it has very poor visibility as only the driver can clearly see out of the tank. Also a giant flag and lights all around the tank make it very easy to spot.
@PINK Much more superior, whilst not having an impossible amount of armor with no engine in the world to move the hunk of a more than likely fake element, it is much superior due to its conventional design and armament, it can cross ditches thanks to the tracks covering the front of the tank, a machine gun on the top to fire at planes/troops, a coaxial, and a proper cannon. It also has sloped armor for bouncing shells, its only weakness is its lack of side skirts and visibility.
@TheBroadside We have tested the "Objector" tank, it has a ok top speed of 60mph, and ok handling, but its tracks are so far back that it cannot traverse trough ditches, and is also prone to slipping. The two main guns are prone to jamming when gas from the other gun is taken in from the other. It also lacks a coaxial, and the two machine guns in the hull can only shoot forwards and cannot traverse. Gun traverse was also slow horizontally, but vertically it was very fast, too fast as the barrel itself would jam. Armor is also thick, but it is flat so a regular APDS can penetrate it with ease, the turret is also very weak, having mostly flat armor. Maintenance is easy as it is a rather simple machine. Constant firing from both cannons also cause a lot of smoke, and recoil to the chassis and turret, reducing service life.
@CALVIN232 The first version is more mobile friendly, il enter that one.
@CALVIN232 This ship has around 530 parts, my iPhone cant even run it, so I dont think its real mobile friendly.
It should have a AC if its for the tropics.
Good effort, next time you should use some thin fuse blocks, as wings are a pain to build with.
@PINK Count me in, I am a Communist Republic after all.
@Pilotmario What is the NRNW?
Maybe someone will fine the rare Gato-r
@zap210 yea haha, there's a joke here where a Martian comes out and starts dancing
El marcianito
I've always had the same feeling as WIP posts, but I am guilty of posting parts for iOS users.
Now make a roller kid XD or a concrete mule
@Sharkie yea I know right XD
Gestor is thick af
Looks a lot like the Condor
Toyotas are the best car ever.