@KnightOfRen while the statement that you quoted was true at the moment, I have created a channel through which servers can be oromoted without clogging the forum section.
@KnightOfRen the list exists for a reason. The reason is hundreds of complaints we had about server ads. Please see that your server has a good enough description, and use that official chanel to advertise your server. I fully support Blue0Bull's decision.
@tucan we only take top notch builders who are also good guys and don't have a grudge with anyone who's already inside. We're rarely adding anyone these days.
@Nintendo we moderators can't be everywhere at once. If someone is bullying you, feel free to tag one of us. You can also better explain your case on an unlisted post. We're here for you.
@KnightOfRen make a list of non-successor entries. We moderators aren't obligated to successor builds to challenges. That's just our good will. Lately, people got a bit too comfortable with it, taking it as their holy right or something, so I'm restricting it a little. Besides, challenges are meant to encourage creation of new content, not to review the old stuff, at least in my opinion. Hence, I'll still be helping those who accidentally failed to submit a successor, but will not successor old builds.
@Macrophage
1. Yes, you get 100 points on SR2 if you have a certain amount of points on your SP account.
2. I was happy.
3. Andrew, I think. A few of us contributed for some newer ones.
4. Yes.
5. Nope.
Fun fact: Zastava (formerly Crvena Zastava - Red Flag) encompasses car and small arms factories of Kragujevac, Srbija. It's hardly believable that a British company would be named that.
Rules say that participants are to build entries. Challenges are supposed to promote new builds, not to review old stuff. I usually avoid successoring old builds to the challenges. I've made a few exceptions lately, but I don't intend to continue.
@Kangy fuselage connects to the attach point on the rear, flat side of the detacher. Missile goes on the big end, small end connects to the plane. And no, you don't have any strikes.
Advise: get a reputation before you host a challenge. Have an attractive thumbnail. Preferably build a thumbnail as fuselage art. Organize yor description better, so people can see what is what. You can see my challenges to see how.
@Madmaximus thumbnail shows a photo of the gun, not the ingame picture.
+1@ToxyPilot that's not possible. Keep the post as it is, just don't do it again.
+1@KnightOfRen I already updated that server once today. You keep changing the picture, and I don't think anyone really cares who's running the server.
+1@KnightOfRen while the statement that you quoted was true at the moment, I have created a channel through which servers can be oromoted without clogging the forum section.
+1@KnightOfRen the list exists for a reason. The reason is hundreds of complaints we had about server ads. Please see that your server has a good enough description, and use that official chanel to advertise your server. I fully support Blue0Bull's decision.
+1@AzureCorp sure.
+1@Alimadan your comment has been removed as it has broken the site rules.
+1@RandomUser09 yes.
+1@ollielebananiaCFSP yes.
+1@Mouette of course.
+1@Kangy the list will be a post with join links and descriptions of servers. I'll make it myself. Thanks for the offer though.
+1@Kipo you got a warning that will expire in a few days. And you got it now because I was not moderating for a few weeks.
+1Pictures aren't loading for me. If others have the same problem, consider deleting and reposting to get proper presentation.
+1Your post has been removed because it appears to have broken the website rules. You can read them here
+1@tucan we only take top notch builders who are also good guys and don't have a grudge with anyone who's already inside. We're rarely adding anyone these days.
+1@mLk watch your language please. @SuperSabre1945 you too. And don't be toxic to other users.
+1@ws yes.
+1@LieutenantSOT yes.
+1@Gestour @winterro done.
+1@Gestour Sure.
+1@winterro of course.
+1@KnightOfRen it was always only a matter of time. Nobody really leaves SP.
+1@MassiveSimurgh thanks :)
+1@Lanc two of your comments have been removed. You have been issued a warning for excessive profanity and being toxic.
+1@Nanachi ajd' ne podjebavaj ljude na sajtu. Nije lepo.
+1@BigChungus997 your comment has been removed for profanity.
+1@Nintendo we moderators can't be everywhere at once. If someone is bullying you, feel free to tag one of us. You can also better explain your case on an unlisted post. We're here for you.
+1@GSXGAMlNG a number of your comments have been removed as they are against the rules.
+1@PineappleDeluxe eh, just some guys thinking they are very smart. Same as usual.
+1This is a very nice build. However, I must suggest posting your unfinished work as unlisted and only publishing the finished product.
+1@russianspy you're a bit late to the party, aren't you?
+1@KnightOfRen make a list of non-successor entries. We moderators aren't obligated to successor builds to challenges. That's just our good will. Lately, people got a bit too comfortable with it, taking it as their holy right or something, so I'm restricting it a little. Besides, challenges are meant to encourage creation of new content, not to review the old stuff, at least in my opinion. Hence, I'll still be helping those who accidentally failed to submit a successor, but will not successor old builds.
+1@RadiumOxide your comment has been removed for excessive profanity. You have been issued a strike.
+1@Macrophage
+11. Yes, you get 100 points on SR2 if you have a certain amount of points on your SP account.
2. I was happy.
3. Andrew, I think. A few of us contributed for some newer ones.
4. Yes.
5. Nope.
Fun fact: Zastava (formerly Crvena Zastava - Red Flag) encompasses car and small arms factories of Kragujevac, Srbija. It's hardly believable that a British company would be named that.
+1Rules say that participants are to build entries. Challenges are supposed to promote new builds, not to review old stuff. I usually avoid successoring old builds to the challenges. I've made a few exceptions lately, but I don't intend to continue.
+1@InfamousRedSkull all high end phones should be able to run this on high settings. I built it on a second-hand laptop.
+1Btw, I have fixed the successor link.
+1@Kangy thanks :)
+1@Kangy fuselage connects to the attach point on the rear, flat side of the detacher. Missile goes on the big end, small end connects to the plane. And no, you don't have any strikes.
+1Windmills dissappear on lower graphic settings. They are quite tasking for the graphics card.
+1@XAircraftManufacturer indeed. However, Honda has threatened to sue for copyright in an exact same situation before.
+1@IceCraft we're volunteers.
+1@CaptainRex123 nothing stops me from upvoting. I upvote a lot of things. As for being a dev, you must be a very good programmer to even have a chance.
+1Congratulations.
+1@TheMegaMauster thanks.
+1Please provide a link to the original so I can make this post a successor.
+1@superTT do you really have to? Does he mean that much to you? It's a gray area at best, and I suggest that you avoid it.
+1Advise: get a reputation before you host a challenge. Have an attractive thumbnail. Preferably build a thumbnail as fuselage art. Organize yor description better, so people can see what is what. You can see my challenges to see how.
+1@xboxseriesx we have decided to let him keep his latest account, as the only thing wrong with him seems to have been being underaged.
+1