@QwertyEpic I would say a Technology type, because you are researching technology for short carrier takeoff. Speed and Maneuverability can be ruled out, same with Stability but that all depends on what you want the aircraft to achieve.
Imma try something with the flight model, you want the link to an unlisted when done?
Edit: Ok this is beyond my ability to fix. What need to be done is moving the CoM way back, it's so far forward that it's basically a dart
@SkyJayTheFirst Thank m8. About the rudder. There is a scaled down rudder hidden within the fuselage hehe. And the missiles, I put them there so they where as far away from the fuselage as possible, because they have no pylon to reduce part count. When I had them near the fuselage, they blew me up on launch. It was 3am when I was finishing up and was too fatigue to continue on, resulting in the roll instability at low speed and low turn rate(and missile problems). I'm working on an improved version very similar to this, with a cockpit, canards, internal weapon bay and some degree of supermaneuverability. But that will be in about a month. I want to take my time with it.
Oh boy. . .
By stock planes you mean the SP default aircraft?
+1What where you smoking
I need it
+1As a Pole, I approve
I could probably outrun this shit on a bicycle tho :)
+1letsa gooooo
+1@OkaNieba <Gryphus One bagged another one!>
+1Performance Cost: 13k
My mobile: "Don't you fucking dare"
I'm trying this out on PC when I can for sure
+1@Susyamngsu Maybe
+1Much noice
+1＼(°o°)／
+1Yesssss
@WinsWings yep, I have a 5 part aircraft that flies decent from a previous challenge
+1@WinsWings The 25th part is there, it just disconnected while I was moving the subassembly
+1@WinsWings much thanks, I'm surprised it came out this good
+1Well, Mirage 2K is out I guess
+1Oh wow, nice
+1Oh wow
+1Oh great, Im gonna need this
Good to see you're here man
+1Hmmm. I'll build a multi-role plen for Poland
+1@ZeroWithSlashedO Yes you can say so. The I-185 M82 and M71 never went further than prototypes
+1@Pigeony Alright, I'll see what I can do
+1By no XML edit. Means mass, drag, engine power must be stock? And also, FT is ok?
+1I already have an aircraft for a previous challenge like this, but it's time to spice it up a bit, I'm in
+1Alright let's see what I can do
+1@Ren lmao
+1@QwertyEpic I would say a Technology type, because you are researching technology for short carrier takeoff. Speed and Maneuverability can be ruled out, same with Stability but that all depends on what you want the aircraft to achieve.
+1@xNotDumb Experimental. An aircraft built to test a field of aircraft engineering. Zerø mentioned these above
+1XF8-U-3 Crusader III heheh boi
+1IDK if intermediate or expert tho
Evacuate the city, engage the defences, and give this man an upvote
+1T
+1Oh yes
+1220 updoots, wow.
+1GJ m8
Alright, ill try something
+1Wtf
+1@Titaninferna 696 now
+1Nice
@TRD6932 Whelp there is. Ill make Su-17 then
+1@WinsWings Thanks man, I hope the Funky isn't too much
+1@WinsWings I messed up with the upload so it's not successor to yours. The one I posted before is not the same. Sry bout that.
+1Posted my plen
+1Still needs to be upscaled, as Arsenal Bird has a wingspan of 1100m. Very nice build.
+1Vejpor
+1:TROLL:
Thanks a lot
+1That time when FALKEN drank Red Bull
+1Very nice. It has a few building features that I was going to use for a future build.
+1Very nice
+1Man, your work is so under-rated. Keep it up
+1Impressive,
+1Imma try something with the flight model, you want the link to an unlisted when done?
+1Edit: Ok this is beyond my ability to fix. What need to be done is moving the CoM way back, it's so far forward that it's basically a dart
"eleven short range, wide targeting Guardians"
+1Me: Slaps 8 flare dispensers on my next build How about no?
Jk very noice
Very nice. I'm going to dogfight the t with my entry aircraft
+1@SkyJayTheFirst Thank m8. About the rudder. There is a scaled down rudder hidden within the fuselage hehe. And the missiles, I put them there so they where as far away from the fuselage as possible, because they have no pylon to reduce part count. When I had them near the fuselage, they blew me up on launch. It was 3am when I was finishing up and was too fatigue to continue on, resulting in the roll instability at low speed and low turn rate(and missile problems). I'm working on an improved version very similar to this, with a cockpit, canards, internal weapon bay and some degree of supermaneuverability. But that will be in about a month. I want to take my time with it.
+1@SkyJayTheFirst Thanks for the tag. Oh and I think you can only tag 3 users in a single message, although I might be wrong.
+1