@Sergio666
Np!
By the way, don't overwhelm yourself with all the PSM stuff at once lol, just deal with one small subject at a time and artificial stability is a good start.
I think THIS will do, it show how to use super basic FT code to keep unstable plane flying.
You can find more tutorial like this in my videos.
Also, PID is just one of many functions used to control stuff, more fancy and more capable if tuned right, I recommend to play around with FT parameters first before moving on to PID because PID you need to get every parameters right before handing all of that to PID to handle.
@BBCP117
I think DCS plane and it's flight control system is more sophisticated than SP.
If you want to feel like SP in DCS, do aerial refueling using warbirds.
@RC1138Boss
No.
Range of motion still the same, the rotator still the same but it'll move with what the code tell it to move rather than raw input.
For example, take a look at the canard, it'll move on it's own independence of your control.
And same goes for everything, basically it take your control input as "suggestion".
"Simulated simple Fly-By-Wire control system"
Yeah...
In my book, PID is not as simple as it seem, nice job tuning that PID.
For me I use more basic form of FT for so long until I have enough brain power to tackle PID lol.
@Highbraker
Don't take my SU-57 for any fact lol, it's tvc is based on mostly unknown 2nd stage engine which I didn't really know how it work so I just made it that it'll have thrust vectoring regardless of circumstance, plus it's a nice eye candy.
@Highbraker
I've watched that before.
There's no mention in roll tvc.
Or maybe I miss it since English is not my first language. (point the time which he speak about roll tvc)
Also, how do you claim "the roll is only in use in high speed combat maneuver"?
@Highbraker
Yeah, I know that it can technically have pitch + roll tvc but I haven't found a solid evidence that confirm or denial the existence of roll tvc.
I've watched a lot of F-22 airshow and I never see tvc doing roll control, even when testing on the ground so I'm leaning toward pitch only tvc.
Also there are a lot of discussion about roll tvc everywhere (Quora, aviation.stackexchange, you name it) so I think it make a lot of sense to make the tvc pitch only according to what can be seen in the video rather than some discussion.
@V1PER5
As I said, I didn't care about speed beyond the design limit and you modified the plane to go to that speed, doing that usually break the FT coding.
@V1PER5
I assume you talking about 900 mph as IAS because only that will cause the plane to wobble.
For me the control just a little sensitive but not wobbly when I go 900 mph, FT code depends much on the machine you are using.
I didn't care much about speed pass 900 mph IAS because most fighter irl can't go pass that speed without some serious problem anyway. (even the Raptor have top speed of 921 mph IAS)
@Chillybaconface
+1lol
Please do.
I wanna see your take on the Felon.
Manually control collective pitch, that's quite rare.
+1@YSNM
+1GF: Can't fly.
Felon: Will fly you.
Nice trick you using to make covfefe system.
+1For me, I'd move camera and seat a bit back to really showcase the transparent cockpit.
@BlinIndustry
+1Yaw tvc should work too but not as well as good old control surface.
@Kimmar100
+1Just stack 2 guns.
You can take it apart and see for yourself.
@Alisuchanka
+1I think it isn't support as of now.
@Sergio666
+1I'm about to test it very soon.
lol
+1You follow the tutorial to the letter, even vectoring the entire engines.
@Dracul0Anderson
+1Yes, it take throttle into the calculation.
@Dracul0Anderson
+1Blinking lights.
@IceCraftGaming
+1lol
Good luck.
@Sergio666
+1Np!
By the way, don't overwhelm yourself with all the PSM stuff at once lol, just deal with one small subject at a time and artificial stability is a good start.
I think THIS will do, it show how to use super basic FT code to keep unstable plane flying.
+1You can find more tutorial like this in my videos.
Also, PID is just one of many functions used to control stuff, more fancy and more capable if tuned right, I recommend to play around with FT parameters first before moving on to PID because PID you need to get every parameters right before handing all of that to PID to handle.
I'm so happy seeing my Raptor fly in the video.
+1Thanks Jundroo.
@MrShenanigans
+1∃
@UltraLight
+1Yea, fun and complicate don't mix well together.
@Nerfaddict
+1Link?
That's sound a bit exaggerated to be honest but I'm curious.
@BBCP117
+1I think DCS plane and it's flight control system is more sophisticated than SP.
If you want to feel like SP in DCS, do aerial refueling using warbirds.
@Beefy
+1lol.
It'll be just fine.
@Beefy
+1I think FT will break only in low fps, so your plane will be just fine with most device.
This fly nicely for my PC, there is no problem at all.
+1@RC1138Boss
+1No.
Range of motion still the same, the rotator still the same but it'll move with what the code tell it to move rather than raw input.
For example, take a look at the canard, it'll move on it's own independence of your control.
And same goes for everything, basically it take your control input as "suggestion".
idk what those doors above landing gear do but they looks cool af.
+1@Heneepr
+1It fly you lol.
You are not flying it, you are just a suggestion where to fly.
@ALRX
+1Thank you.
@Falkenwut
+1Thanks.
So many details to put on, that's why it took almost 2 month for just 900 parts build.
@PapaKernels
+1Thanks.
@EDEN971
+1I don't know.
Maybe not, to be honest Rafale never cross my mind lol.
@Beefy
+1Yeah, tag me in an unlisted post.
I'll be happy try it out.
I think upgraded FT, new livery, new weapons and features worth a new post.
+1@ReinMcDeer
+1lol
If coffee is not enough, try Scho-ka-kola.
This look pretty good to me.
+1"Simulated simple Fly-By-Wire control system"
+1Yeah...
In my book, PID is not as simple as it seem, nice job tuning that PID.
For me I use more basic form of FT for so long until I have enough brain power to tackle PID lol.
@Kurzweil
+1lol
idk Maybe.
@Sergio666
+1Thanks, my building technique may not be top tier but I believe my FT is close to that lol.
@TheSolarFlare
+1Thanks.
More requested tags : @PHURH @Sparky6004 @Strikercritsilver
+1@HungryBoat2
+1According to my calculation, yes.
But hey... I'm bad at math.
@Kurzweil
+1I actually make my tvc roll controllable but is locked by AG.
I just want to know if I miss anything in my little research.
@Highbraker
+1Don't take my SU-57 for any fact lol, it's tvc is based on mostly unknown 2nd stage engine which I didn't really know how it work so I just made it that it'll have thrust vectoring regardless of circumstance, plus it's a nice eye candy.
@Highbraker
+1I've watched that before.
There's no mention in roll tvc.
Or maybe I miss it since English is not my first language. (point the time which he speak about roll tvc)
Also, how do you claim "the roll is only in use in high speed combat maneuver"?
@Highbraker
+1Yeah, I know that it can technically have pitch + roll tvc but I haven't found a solid evidence that confirm or denial the existence of roll tvc.
I've watched a lot of F-22 airshow and I never see tvc doing roll control, even when testing on the ground so I'm leaning toward pitch only tvc.
Also there are a lot of discussion about roll tvc everywhere (Quora, aviation.stackexchange, you name it) so I think it make a lot of sense to make the tvc pitch only according to what can be seen in the video rather than some discussion.
@ReinMcDeer
+1Yeah, that's a tough time for AC fans.
@V1PER5
+1As I said, I didn't care about speed beyond the design limit and you modified the plane to go to that speed, doing that usually break the FT coding.
looking back at my Wyvwrns
+1Hmm... I think they deserved a revisit.
@V1PER5
+1I assume you talking about 900 mph as IAS because only that will cause the plane to wobble.
For me the control just a little sensitive but not wobbly when I go 900 mph, FT code depends much on the machine you are using.
I didn't care much about speed pass 900 mph IAS because most fighter irl can't go pass that speed without some serious problem anyway. (even the Raptor have top speed of 921 mph IAS)
Hey, if you going to post someone else's plane, make sure to modify it or it is against the rules.
+1@Kangy
+1Nice.
I wish I have a chance to see it irl.
@Kangy
+1It barely did those stunts I have to say.
2D tvc is so limiting imo.