105k Hedero Comments

  • (Closed) Modern Defence Vehicle Challenge 2.9 years ago

    Ahh I see. Yeah I have no idea what the cost performance would be though @Kangy

  • (Closed) Modern Defence Vehicle Challenge 2.9 years ago

    Heavy? No if I build anything it would almost certainly be under 1k parts. Although Im not aure Ill make anything after all. I have plans for something else. But I have no idea. @Kangy

    +1
  • THICK BOI 2.9 years ago

    nah I was just joking it doesn't bother me heck if you look at my old descriptions it looks like a monkey typed it lol@Aosullivan799

  • (Closed) Modern Defence Vehicle Challenge 2.9 years ago

    I might participate and build a truly wacky lookin airplane. Its gonna be well under 2k parts though.

    +1
  • THICK BOI 2.9 years ago

    @Aosullivan799 lmao I don't think I did

  • THICK BOI 2.9 years ago

    I think I got brain cancer trying to read that desc

  • FUTURE TECHNOLOGY CHALLENGE (CLOSED) 2.9 years ago

    Ohhh ok yeah I thought it was a version of sp or something yeah the format was a bit confusing 😅@MEHMEDOVICxINDUSTRIES

    +2
  • FUTURE TECHNOLOGY CHALLENGE (CLOSED) 2.9 years ago

    Wait you said last day? Is today the deadline?

  • An Atomic Future Awaits Us 2.9 years ago

    Cause the governor is amazing, he knows whats good @Usairwaysa380

  • Neptune UA-5 'Stingray' 2.9 years ago

    Bruh this is dope

    +4
  • An Atomic Future Awaits Us 2.9 years ago

    Bro I was just down in florida and its amazing I freaking love how few masks there are down there@Usairwaysa380

  • Grumman J2F-6 Duck 2.9 years ago

    Thanks! @Zaineman

  • A-10 Thunderbolt II 2.9 years ago

    Well I have thought about very hard. I might just revamp it at somepoint! But right now I am trying to build a 262 so we'll see how that goes for now XD and Ill think about a new warthog after my current project. @AndrewGarrison

    +1
  • Messerschmitt Bf-109F "Friedrich" 2.9 years ago

    Oh my word thats my real life name! Friedrich!

    +5
  • An Atomic Future Awaits Us 2.9 years ago

    I thought you lived in oregon @MonsterAvgeek

  • North American AJ-1 Savage 3.0 years ago

    Aw man I really appreciate that! Especially from the creator of the game! @AndrewGarrison

  • North American AJ-1 Savage 3.0 years ago

    Thanks alot for that fix! @AndrewGarrison

  • North American AJ-1 Savage 3.0 years ago

    Yeah I'm strictly a mobile builder. I'm not sure how to navigate folders and such let alone on a mobile devise so I think I'll just avoid that area 😂@FeatherWing

  • North American AJ-1 Savage 3.0 years ago

    Thank you @Galland

  • Update v1.12.116 beta is live 3.0 years ago

    Ok well I'm glad this has been brought up to be known about. Sorry for shooting down your feature so quickly 😂@AndrewGarrison

  • Update v1.12.116 beta is live 3.0 years ago

    I have one small issue with the new beta. I noticed when checking connections of a part, when I hold my finger on the connection to see the highlighted piece and then I lift my finger off the button, it then redirects me to the connected piece I was holding my finger on. It gets really annoying and the only way for me to avoid it is to wither not click on the connections piece, or to slide my finger off the connected piece. I'm pretty sure that was just a mess of words and nobeoy understood it but hey I tried.

    +4
  • North American AJ-1 Savage 3.0 years ago

    It really does! @AWESOMENESS360

  • North American AJ-1 Savage 3.0 years ago

    Oh thats really interesting. Thanks for the article! I won't add it to the desc because my flight model doesn't incorporate a realistic landing speed. But I appreciate it! @SanderiteFlyer

  • North American AJ-1 Savage 3.0 years ago

    Yeah I really like what you've done to it, go ahead and update it if you want, what did you change exactly? I might be able to fix those issues with my future builds. @AndrewGarrison

  • North American AJ-1 Savage 3.0 years ago

    True, that is sorta why I did that. I also just liked the way the prop looks when it isn't spinning super quickly. @AWESOMENESS360

  • North American AJ-1 Savage 3.0 years ago

    Well I set my engine power to zero so the props weren't spinning fast enough to see a blur. I just kind of liked the way the props looked when you could see each individual one. @BagelPlane

  • North American AJ-1 Savage 3.0 years ago

    Thank you for tweaking it! I don't mind a bit. I've never updated an xml though? How does that work? @AndrewGarrison

  • North American AJ-1 Savage 3.0 years ago

    He he @GeneralPatrick2

  • North American AJ-1 Savage 3.0 years ago

    Yeah I had a wierd time getting this thing to be able to fly slowly while still having good flight characteristics. But I couldn't figure anything out sadly. @DanDaFreakinMan

  • North American AJ-1 Savage 3.0 years ago

    Yeah its really strange! I really wish they left the top air inlet off because it really ruins the lines on the airplane. @LieutenantSOT

    +1
  • North American AJ-1 Savage 3.0 years ago

    Thank you! @TatsuTheOtaku @KnightOfRen

    +1
  • An Atomic Future Awaits Us 3.0 years ago

    Lmao did it actually get you? @IceCraftGaming

  • An Atomic Future Awaits Us 3.0 years ago

    Yeah I just found one from google 😂@BaconEggs

  • An Atomic Future Awaits Us 3.0 years ago

    Yeah I'm not into those lol @ReinMcDeer

    +1
  • An Atomic Future Awaits Us 3.0 years ago

    Good eye @TatsuTheOtaku @meteorbook345

    +1
  • McDonnell Douglas F-4 Phantom II 3.0 years ago

    Well ok. I'm not auite sure where the line is drawn at misleading thumbnails so I suppose you're fine. @Dracul0Anderson

  • McDonnell Douglas F-4 Phantom II 3.0 years ago

    I would advise using an actual image of your aircraft in the thumbnail because using a videogame picture could be considered to be against the rules. Heads up for next time. @Dracul0Anderson

    +1
  • North American T-2C Buckeye 3.0 years ago

    Lmao thats ok it was pretty funny 😂@TheGreatToad

  • PZL-Mielec M-15 Belphegor 3.0 years ago

    Thank you! @Griffon1

    +1
  • PZL-Mielec M-15 Belphegor 3.0 years ago

    hehe, yes @F104Deathtrap

    +1
  • PZL-Mielec M-15 Belphegor 3.0 years ago

    I thought the same thing! 😂 @VisionAviation

  • PZL-Mielec M-15 Belphegor 3.0 years ago

    You can say that ag- actually nvm @SimplyPlain

    +2
  • PZL-Mielec M-15 Belphegor 3.0 years ago

    You can say that again! @SimplyPlain

  • PZL-Mielec M-15 Belphegor 3.0 years ago

    Exactly bro, that was top secret the USSR didn’t want their tech leaked :0 @Tang0five

    +1
  • PZL-Mielec M-15 Belphegor 3.0 years ago

    Thanks bro! Heck if I saw this on the home page I roo would have thought it was fictional it looks so bizarre 😂@VisionAviation

  • PZL-Mielec M-15 Belphegor 3.0 years ago

    Hmm, thats interesting. I must say I never thought about doing that! @Omgairplane

  • PZL-Mielec M-15 Belphegor 3.0 years ago

    Thanks alot! I really appreciate it. And yes beauty is definitely subjective, I've heard people call the p-51 ugly! @AWESOMENESS360

  • PZL-Mielec M-15 Belphegor 3.0 years ago

    Thanks man! For some reason the colors are dulled in the thumbnail. They pop alot more in the designer. @CRJ900Pilot

  • PZL-Mielec M-15 Belphegor 3.0 years ago

    I agree, to me its got an ugly charm to it. @Default4

  • PZL-Mielec M-15 Belphegor 3.0 years ago

    Ahh c'mon my fuhrer, you dont have to be embarrassed about this aircraft. @BogdanX