But, I actually agree with JamesPlanes on this subject. It wouldv'e probably been different if RU was a dude. And I've heard that she has a tendency to be overdramatic. Not a bad thing, I'm just saying that it could've been a key reason to this mess.
We were glad to download and play with you creations RU. I know I've already posted a lot on different forums about this situation, but I am really surprised that she deleted her account. And I am just very sad to see her go. I remember her when she was a gold member. Probably the first post I've ever seen by her was her ACS-54. Good memories. Well, whatever the reason, hope that things aren't going too badly for her.
Now, I am not an expert at making weird things fly. But I would suggest making large wings and then sizing then down in overload. Also checking the cg would be important. I'm sure some of the more experienced players have better advice.
Oh well after pressing AG1 I sat in my chair clenching super hard and after just a couple seconds I was sent to near lightspeed traveling through the vast infinite map of Simpleplanes wondering if I'll ever see the ground again. Nothing too intense.
Root beer is delicious.I don't drink soft drinks anymore though.Garrison needs help if he disagrees with,"root beer is the finest drink on the planet".
Well, I have an a-4 skyhawk in my files that I built a few months ago but now it is outdated and not finished. I don't think I will finish it however you're more then welcome to download the unlosted model. @R2d2hunter
Great aircraft. There are a few mis-spelled names in the cockpit however. You have "reviecer" and feathering "Light", as it's supposed to be feathering left.
Wow, I was just planning to write a farewell message and a thank you for creating a game and website that allows all of us aviation enthusiasts to come together and enjoy a community that's hard to find just anywhere, but then I forgot about april fools.
Thank you I highly appreciate your comments and kind support. The one issue with the glass and fuselage cutting updates is that now I'm forced to make cockpits, and cockpits infamously have lots of bolts, shapes and oddities and I'm not really the type to put a whole lot of effort into them. And it sounds like alot of people care about a highly detailed cockpit. I'll do my best but I won't spend so much time on the cockpit that I lose all interest in it. But hey thats awesome that you worked on mustangs before. But wait, how old are you to have worked on mustangs? Stangs weren't in service anywhere for like 80 years lol@Kangy
Well thanks for the feedback. I honestly wasn't expecting this much flak about the cockpit. Even 2Papi2Chulo said it was he best way to do the frame without diving into too much major complexity but hey, I mean I'm glad I know what to do different if I ever rebuild my mustang. So thank you, but I wasn't expecting people to hate the canopy this much. I knew very well going into the project that the canopy would not look exactly like the real one. I had several earlier attempts trying different canopy methods to get the shape more accurate. Nothing worked due to the seams in the conjoing pieces of glass showing their faces/edges. So I went with the most obvious methos, the rounded frame. And yeah the cockpit itself doesn't look very convincing but I can't really pin down what it is that looks off. I tried to make the angles of the dashboard as accurate to the real one as possible but somehow it still didn't end up right. The issue with the mustang is that its so popular and beloved that even for me I almost nitpick myself to death on it. It's probably my favorite warbird. So almsot nothing I did would fully satisfy myself. But I likely will avoid this aircraft in the future though. @Kangy
Yeah, the website makes zero sense. Sometimes a crap build with an ok cockpit receives a ton of support while really impressive builds like this one don’t get much. I’ve come to realize that I don’t build for points anymore, I’m predicting that I’ll get no more then 30 or 40 upvotes on my next upload. But that’s fine with me, I upload for entertainment for those who actually care about it. @Urocyon
Iodide? Not chloride!? I feel as though I've been lied to!!!
+3Umm, I would like to know what pc you're using that could possibly run 20k parts. That number is hard to say without choking.
+3Oh my gosh this is so cute
+3Bro, your first airplane!? This is really amazing for your first airplane. I can see your future as being a pro builder. Keep it up!
+3I've just found what I needed in life. Thank you.@belugasub
+3People have to learn that paying is caring. Its the best form of affection.@AndrewGarrison
+3Does the same thing to me too lol.@SemedianIndustries
+3I'm so sorry to hear. What are your health issues?
+3But, I actually agree with JamesPlanes on this subject. It wouldv'e probably been different if RU was a dude. And I've heard that she has a tendency to be overdramatic. Not a bad thing, I'm just saying that it could've been a key reason to this mess.
+3We were glad to download and play with you creations RU. I know I've already posted a lot on different forums about this situation, but I am really surprised that she deleted her account. And I am just very sad to see her go. I remember her when she was a gold member. Probably the first post I've ever seen by her was her ACS-54. Good memories. Well, whatever the reason, hope that things aren't going too badly for her.
+3Now, I am not an expert at making weird things fly. But I would suggest making large wings and then sizing then down in overload. Also checking the cg would be important. I'm sure some of the more experienced players have better advice.
+3I don't remember the last time I saw something so beautiful.
+3Excuse me, one hundred upvotes in 23 hours?
+3Actually I'm pretty sure the robots were fighting the fps instead of eachother.@Gameboi14
+3So, why didn't you name it a Kikka then?
+3Oh well after pressing AG1 I sat in my chair clenching super hard and after just a couple seconds I was sent to near lightspeed traveling through the vast infinite map of Simpleplanes wondering if I'll ever see the ground again. Nothing too intense.
+3Root beer is delicious.I don't drink soft drinks anymore though.Garrison needs help if he disagrees with,"root beer is the finest drink on the planet".
+3It’s ok. Thanks for the support! @Carsonkiddy2
+2for fokker sake this plane is pretty cool
+2"Waltuh, stop making methamphetamine and come help me kill this gusso fringo man Waltuh"
+2BUT YOUR CARRY-ONE LUGGAGE GOES UNDER THE SEAT, BUT WHEN THAT BAR IS IN THE MIDDLE IT CAN'T GO ANYWHEREEEE
+2i forgor 💀
Too bad you didn't do a cockpit. That would have been a cool bonus!
+2I love the livery personally. But I guess you could do a silver with black hood 🤷🏻♂️
+2Well, I have an a-4 skyhawk in my files that I built a few months ago but now it is outdated and not finished. I don't think I will finish it however you're more then welcome to download the unlosted model. @R2d2hunter
+2Poetic one might say. @Oxen
+2Maybe. I'll see if I feel like doimg that. @MikuisNOTaboi
+2Great aircraft. There are a few mis-spelled names in the cockpit however. You have "reviecer" and feathering "Light", as it's supposed to be feathering left.
+2Wow, I was just planning to write a farewell message and a thank you for creating a game and website that allows all of us aviation enthusiasts to come together and enjoy a community that's hard to find just anywhere, but then I forgot about april fools.
Well done Andrew.
+2Is a bri'ish hott innit?
+2No I'm genuinely not being sarcastic I had no idea that we would have winter in North America but on the opposite side would be summer @Typhoon03
+2Thank you I highly appreciate your comments and kind support. The one issue with the glass and fuselage cutting updates is that now I'm forced to make cockpits, and cockpits infamously have lots of bolts, shapes and oddities and I'm not really the type to put a whole lot of effort into them. And it sounds like alot of people care about a highly detailed cockpit. I'll do my best but I won't spend so much time on the cockpit that I lose all interest in it. But hey thats awesome that you worked on mustangs before. But wait, how old are you to have worked on mustangs? Stangs weren't in service anywhere for like 80 years lol@Kangy
+2Well thanks for the feedback. I honestly wasn't expecting this much flak about the cockpit. Even 2Papi2Chulo said it was he best way to do the frame without diving into too much major complexity but hey, I mean I'm glad I know what to do different if I ever rebuild my mustang. So thank you, but I wasn't expecting people to hate the canopy this much. I knew very well going into the project that the canopy would not look exactly like the real one. I had several earlier attempts trying different canopy methods to get the shape more accurate. Nothing worked due to the seams in the conjoing pieces of glass showing their faces/edges. So I went with the most obvious methos, the rounded frame. And yeah the cockpit itself doesn't look very convincing but I can't really pin down what it is that looks off. I tried to make the angles of the dashboard as accurate to the real one as possible but somehow it still didn't end up right. The issue with the mustang is that its so popular and beloved that even for me I almost nitpick myself to death on it. It's probably my favorite warbird. So almsot nothing I did would fully satisfy myself. But I likely will avoid this aircraft in the future though. @Kangy
+2les goooooo @Kangy
+2Ohhh ok yeah I thought it was a version of sp or something yeah the format was a bit confusing 😅@MEHMEDOVICxINDUSTRIES
+2You can say that ag- actually nvm @SimplyPlain
+2Yeah, the website makes zero sense. Sometimes a crap build with an ok cockpit receives a ton of support while really impressive builds like this one don’t get much. I’ve come to realize that I don’t build for points anymore, I’m predicting that I’ll get no more then 30 or 40 upvotes on my next upload. But that’s fine with me, I upload for entertainment for those who actually care about it. @Urocyon
+2Lmao I thought the thumbnail was a screenshot of the actual intro 😂 impressive
+2OH MY GOD HES BACK
+2Hello do you want to explode @TheGreatToad
+2Yes show facial region
+2Ugh I am still waiting for the beta, amazing new addition but I am so ready to get back to building again! I am so impatient I know haha
+2Ahhh ok, interesting @ReinMcDeer @WolfSpark
+2Thanks for calling him out, looks like he already gave credit though which is nice. @Kangy
+2And you don't have to if it's too difficult, was just suggesting! @Chillybaconface
+2Wow, just wow. Easily the best f117 on the site, incredible job well done!
+2Yes @Kangy
+2Big pp
+2The rules require that you have a build in the thumbnail. I'm pretty sure this counts as a misleading thumbnail. @Viper_Z3R0
+2Why are the wheels so thin? The landing gear looks weak and unstable with super thin wheels like that.
+2Lmao bruh if it's below 500 parts it's definitely low part count, at least for most people unless your playing simpleplanes on a lemon @ThomasRoderick
+2