@shipster the ship was actualy not taht bad balance wise. the construction misshap was the lowest cannon deck. it was so low that it was actualy not usable at all and it sunk the ship.
@shipster the vasa was actualy well balanced.... until a spy told the king that his enemy did build a bigger ship (that wasnt true) and so king gustav adolf wanted the ship with more guns (wich wasnt possible with sacrificing a lot). i hope you got it now.
ah the old tale of the king that wanted only greatness and sunk a ship by trying to archive it. gustaf adolf you old stupid guy (he died because he was very shortsighted and left his glasses in the tent for a battle).
@Mumpsy sounds better than the nazi ufo stuff you can read about on certain websites. but still a bit on the oddside of things (ok on the other hand wolfenstein actualy gives a explanation who came up with the stuff).
@JettStorm its still a bit lofty to claim that they build ufo engines. we talk about the same idiot who proclaimed that he wants to be called maier if a enemy plane is sighted over reichs territory (the next day a dh mosquito was spotted over berlin and afterwards goering was called maier when the SS or gestapo wasnt realy around). or do you think that this plane is from the reality in wich hitler cured cancer?
@Treadmill103 @Mumpsy yeah it looks great and stuff but mysterious hover technology is a bit of a stretch. especialy if you know that the nazis also researched someplanes that came close to being liftbodys and that this things looks like one.
@ThomasRoderick my descrition is so short because i didtn know it until yesterday too.
the only thing that totaly beats this is the void-schneider engine (its the ship based version of a cyclorotor system and allows a ship with normal build characterisitcs to drive sideways).
@ThomasRoderick my descrition is so short because i didtn know it until yesterday too.
the only thing that totaly beats this is the void-schneider engine (its the ship based version of a cyclorotor system and allows a ship with normal build characterisitcs to drive sideways).
@zerogamer opertation eagleclaw. your statement is invalid. research on your own or ask me about it and what this implies about the common chopper. @RocCrafter101
uhm you know that gliding is unpowered flight? but besides this there is nothing to call out great design. and a possible transatmospheric spacecraft (if this isnt one allready).
or do you stay up longer than others? because truth be told: writing errors can be a sign of higher inteligence. the raisin for this is that people with more brain power have a tendency to think thaster than they can talk or write.
@CrazyCatZe mein freund der fleiger den du als basis verwendet hast war die ba 349 natter du hast pa geschrieben bitte korigieren ansonsten is nich viel aus zu setzen.
uhm you have messed things up: the word you searched for was sperlingskauz (singular) but the word your wrote was sperlingskäuze (plural). looks good but it is still only one plane so please korrekt your misshap.
@Devilsfish controlier mal bitte die rechtschreibung von torpedos in der beschreibung. das schlechte wortspiel hast du also nicht verstanden. naja macht nix.
@RamboJutter @LiamW sorry i got the name from the rocket wrong. the tiny tim is even bigger. this is the rp-3 and most likely on the warhead side close to the tiny tim (and the tiny tim is big). the only thing that could beat the tiny tim and the rp-3 is the V1 airborne launch version for the heinkel he111.
@LiamW @RamboJutter in il2 sturmovik they called this rocket tiny tim. this is btw the biggest plane carried rocket of WWII if i got the depictions in il2 right. some rocket builders have a sense of humor.
wow i think the only way to get this better is with such extreme mesures like the ones that sleddriver is using. for every one: this si how the engines on a real ju52 were build (ok the wing engines on the real ones where horn shaped but i dont know how to build such forms so yes this is most likely the most precise ju52 on site).
polish the engine naceeles a bit more and work on forms and shapes the cockpit area is to short. and the heck is a bit to short when in reduces into this little thorn like thing. but it looks great for what it is.
@MobyDick but one thing on this thing is better than reality: you probably know the worlds most mysterious tank the kugelpanzer. this is a tank but totaly scitific overthinking and overkill. i think the this more or less spherical because a sphere is on paper the best shape to deflect bullets.
@MobyDick btw this vehicle looks like GLaDOS tried to put a turret on wheels. something that a scientist without any military experience would build. nice but very likely weak to a good ground attacker.
your plane has shiny dumbfire rockets that i want. the had many variations (like jelly beans) and many shapes and you custom build some that i want as a normal part ingame. buhuhuhuhuhuhu.
only one problem is there but i give you the benefit of dont knowing this (practicaly every ju52 on the site has this wrong): the engines on the wings were sligthly nutched outwards so that in the event of the main engine failing the veritcal controlsurface could still get engine airflow to work with.
@Sgtk to call you out: the design is very neat. looks more polished than the sheet metal donkey (junkers j1 if i can trust google and the junkers website on this) but not as polished than a geebee. neat for the start of the race of the monplanes. good choice i think.
you are right in almost all circumstances @Trainzo but our friend @Sgtk could also mention in the description that the company was later turned into blom & voss. great model but a bit more history cant harm the charm.
looks nice. but why is it called like one of the most common engine producers in germany at the time?
WHISKeY TANGO FOXTROTT I REPEAT WHISKEY TANGO FOXTROTT!!!!!! who is so crazy and comes up with sucha thing to begin with?
@GenericWhiteGuy ok.
@GenericWhiteGuy looks great but why is this canon shaped like a assault rifle?
@shipster the ship was actualy not taht bad balance wise. the construction misshap was the lowest cannon deck. it was so low that it was actualy not usable at all and it sunk the ship.
@shipster the vasa was actualy well balanced.... until a spy told the king that his enemy did build a bigger ship (that wasnt true) and so king gustav adolf wanted the ship with more guns (wich wasnt possible with sacrificing a lot). i hope you got it now.
@shipster why you ask?
ah the old tale of the king that wanted only greatness and sunk a ship by trying to archive it. gustaf adolf you old stupid guy (he died because he was very shortsighted and left his glasses in the tent for a battle).
@flyingsteve88 i am not shure if i ever wathced this specific episode but i rember the show.
me
@Mumpsy sounds better than the nazi ufo stuff you can read about on certain websites. but still a bit on the oddside of things (ok on the other hand wolfenstein actualy gives a explanation who came up with the stuff).
@JettStorm its still a bit lofty to claim that they build ufo engines. we talk about the same idiot who proclaimed that he wants to be called maier if a enemy plane is sighted over reichs territory (the next day a dh mosquito was spotted over berlin and afterwards goering was called maier when the SS or gestapo wasnt realy around). or do you think that this plane is from the reality in wich hitler cured cancer?
@Treadmill103 @Mumpsy yeah it looks great and stuff but mysterious hover technology is a bit of a stretch. especialy if you know that the nazis also researched someplanes that came close to being liftbodys and that this things looks like one.
@ThomasRoderick my descrition is so short because i didtn know it until yesterday too.
the only thing that totaly beats this is the void-schneider engine (its the ship based version of a cyclorotor system and allows a ship with normal build characterisitcs to drive sideways).
@ThomasRoderick my descrition is so short because i didtn know it until yesterday too.
+2the only thing that totaly beats this is the void-schneider engine (its the ship based version of a cyclorotor system and allows a ship with normal build characterisitcs to drive sideways).
@ThomasRoderick it is a disc shaped tugboat with a rotating mantel screw.
picture of the real deal: klick me
see ivan if it dont work you put more engines on it.
nice but still not a glide bomb. the fins in the front are only there to give stability but not to glide.
+1@zerogamer opertation eagleclaw. your statement is invalid. research on your own or ask me about it and what this implies about the common chopper. @RocCrafter101
uhm you know that gliding is unpowered flight? but besides this there is nothing to call out great design. and a possible transatmospheric spacecraft (if this isnt one allready).
@QuantausAviation some planes are build to be as badass as possible. others try and fail. the do335 was what the f104 tried to be.
@QuantausAviation uhm you know that the dornier do335 arrow was a bomber in this configuration too?
@steampunk0202 he was also known as charlie brown but yes.
@steampunk0202 oh and you forget a detail: the pilot of that b17 was charles m. schulz.
+1or do you stay up longer than others? because truth be told: writing errors can be a sign of higher inteligence. the raisin for this is that people with more brain power have a tendency to think thaster than they can talk or write.
@steampunk0202 the description contians many writing errors. do you know your IQ level?
lass mich raten @steampunk2020: du bist auch deutscher?
@CrazyCatZe mein freund der fleiger den du als basis verwendet hast war die ba 349 natter du hast pa geschrieben bitte korigieren ansonsten is nich viel aus zu setzen.
uhm you have messed things up: the word you searched for was sperlingskauz (singular) but the word your wrote was sperlingskäuze (plural). looks good but it is still only one plane so please korrekt your misshap.
+1you remember my deadly teapot? i made a better, more advanced deadly teapot. still not a GLaDOS quote but a good descrition of the whole design.
@Devilsfish controlier mal bitte die rechtschreibung von torpedos in der beschreibung. das schlechte wortspiel hast du also nicht verstanden. naja macht nix.
@Devilsfish uhm devilsfish ich habe da mal ne frage: was torpedoes this thing not?
@LiamW did you know that the rpg is not a russian development? its a copie of the panzerfaust 150.
@RamboJutter @LiamW sorry i got the name from the rocket wrong. the tiny tim is even bigger. this is the rp-3 and most likely on the warhead side close to the tiny tim (and the tiny tim is big). the only thing that could beat the tiny tim and the rp-3 is the V1 airborne launch version for the heinkel he111.
+2@LiamW @RamboJutter in il2 sturmovik they called this rocket tiny tim. this is btw the biggest plane carried rocket of WWII if i got the depictions in il2 right. some rocket builders have a sense of humor.
wow i think the only way to get this better is with such extreme mesures like the ones that sleddriver is using. for every one: this si how the engines on a real ju52 were build (ok the wing engines on the real ones where horn shaped but i dont know how to build such forms so yes this is most likely the most precise ju52 on site).
@CRJ900Pilot @randomusername fun fact: the jellyfish it is named after is biological immortal.
@CRJ900Pilot @randomusername fun fact: the jellyfish it is named after is biological immortal.
+1polish the engine naceeles a bit more and work on forms and shapes the cockpit area is to short. and the heck is a bit to short when in reduces into this little thorn like thing. but it looks great for what it is.
can you build a high altitude researh aircraft based on the aurelia aurita jellifish?
@MobyDick but one thing on this thing is better than reality: you probably know the worlds most mysterious tank the kugelpanzer. this is a tank but totaly scitific overthinking and overkill. i think the this more or less spherical because a sphere is on paper the best shape to deflect bullets.
@MobyDick btw this vehicle looks like GLaDOS tried to put a turret on wheels. something that a scientist without any military experience would build. nice but very likely weak to a good ground attacker.
@MobyDick ok. a deadly teapot with nice windows. if apple would build a house, would it have windows?
the teapot comment is only ment as a joke. it looks good but why the sky light?
looks like a weaponized teapot. teapot to the rescue.
your plane has shiny dumbfire rockets that i want. the had many variations (like jelly beans) and many shapes and you custom build some that i want as a normal part ingame. buhuhuhuhuhuhu.
if you didnt knew this until now: youre welcome. you can actualy see this on pictures taken from above or top down illustrations of the plane.
only one problem is there but i give you the benefit of dont knowing this (practicaly every ju52 on the site has this wrong): the engines on the wings were sligthly nutched outwards so that in the event of the main engine failing the veritcal controlsurface could still get engine airflow to work with.
@Sgtk to call you out: the design is very neat. looks more polished than the sheet metal donkey (junkers j1 if i can trust google and the junkers website on this) but not as polished than a geebee. neat for the start of the race of the monplanes. good choice i think.
you are right in almost all circumstances @Trainzo but our friend @Sgtk could also mention in the description that the company was later turned into blom & voss. great model but a bit more history cant harm the charm.
+1