15.5k Johnnyynf Comments

  • yes 2.9 years ago

    androne

  • Little bullfinch 2.9 years ago

    simple birb

    +2
  • T-55 (New Year Special) 2.9 years ago

    very simple

  • HIYOKO 2.9 years ago

    nice

  • Your Exam Paper 2.9 years ago

    pretty accurate if you ask me

    +1
  • DC-3 2.9 years ago

    T

  • BMW R60/2-Beiwagen (VR - Supported) 2.9 years ago

    absolute beautiful

    +1
  • Spähpanzer SP I.C 2.9 years ago

    the tank that used to be fun in WOT

  • German Corsair: VR 2.9 years ago

    the meme is back bois

    +2
  • Game of Life(galaxy) 2.9 years ago

    mad lad

    +3
  • P-51-B V16 Piston engine 2.9 years ago

    @WhistlingDeath14 It's just because I have a v8 lying around and I just stitch two of them together

  • experiment v1 2.9 years ago

    laugh in my piston engine plane

    +5
  • P-51-B V16 Piston engine 2.9 years ago

    @ShinkansenGuy no
    The mod is for disableing the spinn limit on parts such as free spinning rotator
    As long as SP keep this spinn limit, I cannot make a mod free piston engine

  • How to piston engine (basic) 2.9 years ago

    @WormWithLegs
    it's actually fairly doable i've done a two stroke by using jet engine as stroke method

    But the thing with jet propulsion is you can't keep the force inside the system. So not to much usability.
    Maybe in a boxer layout could work, but I still hadn't figure out how to bind nozzel output to FT because jet engine is too slow to react

  • P-51-B V16 Piston engine 2.9 years ago

    @KazinFyre Have you enabled the limitless spin mod?

    +1
  • How to piston engine (basic) 2.9 years ago

    @WormWithLegs yes, the epidemic of oversimplification

  • P-51-B V16 Piston engine 2.9 years ago

    @MrShenanigans maybe
    my original thought is to build new plane for the engine

    but since I don't have much time as before, ill just go engine swap some planes

  • S-383K Shouko (for Shouko's birthday gift) 2.9 years ago

    upvote for komi

    +3
  • xcrr_offroad3 2.9 years ago

    he smol

  • Winterland Trailer | Christmas special 2.9 years ago

    this trailer is so good it let me think SP has a good tire model

    +2
  • Vintage Prototype Challenge result! 2.9 years ago

    @Bellcat car with big smile

  • Vintage Prototype Challenge result! 2.9 years ago

    @EdgyCar
    @Thiccmemegod34
    @Nanta02

  • Vintage Prototype Challenge result! 2.9 years ago

    @WiiSmol
    @1918
    @DEN12345

  • Vintage Prototype Challenge result! 2.9 years ago

    @BsetAutomotiveFan2022
    @Griffon1
    @UraniumOxide

    +1
  • G638 Omologata 2.9 years ago

    Details: 7
    On one hand, the suspension structure is awesome, with a beautiful transverse engine, spinning wheel hub, and beautiful front headlight housing.
    Another hand It has a sparse cockpit and no fancy roll cage and frame(although it does help to keep the part count down).

    Authenticity: 7
    If it has a livery and an authentic-looking cockpit and realistic driving feel this will have 10 points in this category. And this car does look like real a group 4 Prototype
    race car.

    Design: 10
    Absolutely gorgeous, big eyes do look cute

    Drive: 6
    Pretty sad that it doesn't have realistic driving dynamic. The front is overly grippy but won't spinout. The suspension effect (bump-absorbing effect) on the other hand is awesome.

    total: 30 points

    +1
  • Engine l4g1620i 2.9 years ago

    nice

  • Tips for building for VR 2.9 years ago

    About the glitching wheels
    It's time to fix the wheel and soft connection issue isn't it wink wink

    +4
  • My idea for SP to gain popularity 2.9 years ago

    @BlinIndustry I think an easy way out is to just add toggle collision for multiplayer
    and nice martin reference

    +1
  • Airc 2.9 years ago

    this is nice

  • Ford Bronco 2.9 years ago

    @OVO go to the official discord server list and click the server you wanna join

  • My idea for SP to gain popularity 2.9 years ago

    @DUCKBIRD too, like a historical compaign
    that will be super cool

  • Ford Bronco 2.9 years ago

    underrated man
    wanna join SVT?

  • Offroad buggy 2.9 years ago

    looks like a Dream car builder build

  • simple piston engine 2.9 years ago

    wow very simular to what i started with

    +1
  • SIMPLEPLANES updates in 2022 2.9 years ago

    I think with point 1, currently in SP there's some kind of spin prevent mechanism built into the ingame engine, so you introduce enough slip (turning), the engine will automatically cut power

    +1
  • Biplane attempt 2.9 years ago

    very simple

  • SIMPLEPLANES updates in 2022 2.9 years ago

    I think for car building there are a few points I have thought of

    not a feature, but a bug fix:
    Currently, there's no way to add input to the brake of the wheel, it only be applied by pressing the brake, and can not control by FT input.

    1. Ball joint
      because the ball joint

    2. A drive train system
      Drag and drop drive train, that has spinning animation, and we can connect one end on transmission, one end to diff (and have settings on trans and diff), and finally to a wheel or a block (for making engine prop using engine power).

    3. A holo rim for the wheel with physical tire model
      holo in the middle so we can make our own spoke
      and we can customize how's the rim size, how tall the sidewall, compound, tire pressure, and maybe the curvature of the tire.
      Because the deformation of the tire and change in contact pach is also an important part of suspension

    4. engine mapping
      It will be a nice opportunity to teach everyone how ICB works
      Although I don't expect the level of detail like in automation.

    5. fixing the soft connection or at least have the option of having stronger soft connection without haveing to add weight

    But still, I think if we want SP to attract more crowds, this will not be the priority.
    I think what will make more new player is the ability for custom made missions, campaigns, challenges, and races so the player has something to do with their build

    +2
  • Just Trees 2.9 years ago

    very funky indeed

    +1
  • 330 Prototype 4 (Vintage Prototype Challenge) 2.9 years ago

    Details: 7
    good work, the dash looks simple but futuristic with a smooth body and still keeps the part count down. And the seat is pretty cool
    and with proper front suspension.

    Authenticity: 7
    On one side, It's quite an unconventional build for a prototype/can-am car, on the other side it does have the futurism feel from the 60's. And the color scheme is pretty cool.

    Design:7
    Unconventional, but still pretty cool, maybe it can be shorter and narrower (too wide and long for a can-am car)

    Drive:10
    It drives really well
    Well sprung and controlled spring, rotatable at a slower speed, and with slight and well-tuned aero, it's stable but still very drivable at higher speed.
    and overall have a nice oversteer and understeer behavior

    total:31

    +1
  • Lexus LFA 2010 2.9 years ago

    I'm scared

  • Alder 363E 2.9 years ago

    Details: 7
    Generally pretty good. Lights, openable panels, beautiful engine, roll cage structure and the defuser is kinda cool.
    But the suspension structure is lacking and the interior can have more.

    Authenticity: 8
    Love the livery, looks really cool. And the style is spot on of late 60's prototype. Although the dimension isn't what prototypes have had in the 60's.

    Design: 10
    Awesome design, maybe the interior space could be wider.

    Drive: 5
    There's some suspension effect, but the rear is bouncing like crazy.
    The car acceleration is just kinda weird. Steers pretty neutral, which is pretty nice.
    total: 30 points

  • Phoenix Automotive PX-047 (Fictional Vintage Prototype Challenge) 2.9 years ago

    Details: 7
    With only 209 parts, this is an amazing result, with openable panels and rear structure, but still bit lacking in interior and suspension

    Authenticity: 6 (-1)
    It really does have hefty look, and it do look like a prototype from the early 70's, and the livery is fitting.
    such a shame that it isn't in real life-size, which I take 1 point off.

    Design: 8
    In the general great-looking prototype, but I think the front looks a bit unnatural.

    Drive: 4(-1)
    Does have some suspension, but has limited effect.
    Quite stable as it's more understeery, but with greater steering angle it bounce around, plus not in scale drives kinda weird.

    total: 25 points
    (-) point is due to scale

  • sus car 2.9 years ago

    plane builder: haha sus
    Car builder: yes sus

  • 70' Dodge Challenger 2.9 years ago

    simple but the front end looks pretty good

  • Formula R 6.0 R-Y SE 2.9 years ago

    seriously impressive build, too bad that the suspension doesn't actually work (my guess is faulty connection)
    Wanna join SVT?

    +2
  • Hoover Auto J120 3.0 years ago

    interesting

  • V8 schematic 3.0 years ago

    nice build!

  • F-45A 3.0 years ago

    yes
    Playing VTOL VR plane in VR in simpleplanes will be funny

    +1
  • [CLOSED] SP Racing Challenge 3.0 years ago

    a great idea of Spec GT and spec Open wheel
    a Tuning/Modify spec that can build upon an existing build.

  • V F Prototype Challenge Rule elaborate 3.0 years ago

    @Griffon1usinging the spring part won't DQ u
    It is just using the spring partly as the only other part of your suspension being not OK
    (I want to encourage other's to build (somewhat proper) suspension system

    +1