1,138 Kaveman Comments

  • [structure] st louis arch 8 months ago

    The arch is in Missouri though?

  • Antonio 8 months ago

    Thanks for the description. I was confused when I first saw it cuz I thought you gave the plane a human name lol. I didn't realize you named it after the pilot...

  • w8wjw8q9w 8 months ago

    @Monarchii Exact copy. That's too bad

  • DAC-HF1B 8 months ago

    Also, quick question for anyone downloading the plane, could you take a look at the gear bays and help me by explaining the timing for them? I don't get how to make landing gear bays time up perfectly, and can't find anything super useful.

  • Droplet 8 months ago

    If it isn't yours then why are you reposting it? I mean, it's one of the most popular builds on this site

  • DAC-F1 9 months ago

    @teodor99 Alright. I have a plane coming up based on the Ta-154, But I have to get the wings sorted out first. It's an older plane I made on mobile, so I have to redesign the wings a little

  • DAC-F1 9 months ago

    @teodor99 I was working on the realistic version last night, and after removing the rear fuel tank, I added the engine and was able to fit a somewhat realistic V-12

  • F6F Hellcat 9 months ago

    I fixed it. It was just turning too hard but not hard enough to cause a flatspin. I added 1000 pounds to the front and shrunk the elevators a little

  • DAC-F1 9 months ago

    @teodor99 It would have been at the back if sp required engines. It would have been smaller, since it's liquid cooled, but to offset the weight difference I went with a fuel tank instead for more range

  • DAC-F1 9 months ago

    @SchweizerLuftCorporation are you saying the canopy lever?

  • DAC-F1 9 months ago

    Is anyone else having problems downloading this? Please let me know so hopefully I can get it fixed!

  • T-03 "Dorito" 9 months ago

    If you want to fix the issue of it not turning easily, just take the hinge rotators and limit them to 10-15 degrees of range

  • HWJ1-B 9 months ago

    @HWconpany6 Honestly, most people, including myself, need to work on wings the most, but yours look incredible, and could probably focus a little more on the fuselage

  • HWJ1-B 9 months ago

    Very Good job on the wings

  • simple Messerschmitt Bf-110 C-2 9 months ago

    Quick tip: If you don't add any special detailing, like cockpits or fuselage wings, you should probably add a "simple" in the title, just so people don't think you're a five year old. It might help you get more downloads. Overall it looks really good

  • Pratt and Whitney engine for sale! 9 months ago

    @LucadaConcord1128 Yeah dude this is an exact copy of a different engine. stop begging for upvotes acting like you did something when you can go out and make your own build. It's not cool, it's called theft, and you could get banned for that

  • DAC-3 Wolverine 9 months ago

    @SomeSPGuyWhoLikesLore Thank you!

  • DAC-3 Wolverine 9 months ago

    @Hahahahaahahshs i meant like, what are the benefits

  • DAC-3 Wolverine 9 months ago

    @Hahahahaahahshs what exactly does that do?

  • DAC-3 Wolverine 9 months ago

    @Hahahahaahahshs how do u use magnets for engines? I haven't heard of it b4

  • DAC-3 Wolverine 9 months ago

    @Hahahahaahahshs First off, thanks for upvoting, second, what would you like to see for changes?

  • DAC-3 Wolverine 9 months ago

    @Doyoucares thanks for the upvote

  • P-89 Saber 9 months ago

    @ShiraMakesAircraft make sure the prop torque is in the game. If so, it might be that

  • Hitler's Plane 9 months ago

    @TheAviator77 I think the only dude that would get offended by this is the man himself, Hitler

  • droplept 9 months ago

    @ComradeInCommune Just report him the entire post is a copy paste of the original droplet

  • P-89 Saber 9 months ago

    @ShiraMakesAircraft Could be weight distribution, one wing is slightly larger than the other, or prop torque, but I don't know if prop torque is modeled in the game

  • DAC-21 G-2 10 months ago

    Also I will make a mod-free version for non-pc players

  • No Blueprint Challenge 10 months ago

    I was super confused when I saw this and the other corsair, and I thought maybe you stole the other guy's build, but nope- the power/weight is way different, and you have less parts

  • B-29 SuperFortress 10 months ago

    @BarnettAircraftCompany Don't worry I reported all of "his" builds

  • Warthunder Challenge! (CLOSED!) 10 months ago

    @TheCommentaryGuy I have F-22 blueprints. Just measurements, nothing crazy

  • MiG-9 10 months ago

    Great Job, all I can say. It's... incredible

  • L2 10 months ago

    wow you added 5 parts to a build that isn't yours

  • Aero Boero AB-180RVR 10 months ago

    I'm sorry I can't download this rn, but how the heck did you make it look so good WITH ONLY 104 PARTS?!?!? SORCERER!

  • P-38 10 months ago

    @GoldenAviationYT Np. The reason to use 0 drag is because the physics of simpleplanes is really weird, so it leads to a lot more drag than normal, and using 0 means less engine power leading to more realistic planes. the blueprints can be found by clicking on the eye on the sidebar and selecting what looks like a map. you can upload pictures from there

  • P-38 10 months ago

    few tips-use fuselage blocks for pretty much everything, and make sure to set the drag of each fuselage block to 0, using xml. work on custom cockpits and landing gear, as they are pretty simple and help a lot. Finally, you can use blueprints if you want it to be as close to the plane as possible.

  • XF-15 10 months ago

    Also one tip for more realistic planes. When usijng fuselage blocks, set their drag to 0 in the xml file and only have the wings produce drag. This allows you to use a less powerful engine which gives a more realistic power/weight

  • XF-15 10 months ago

    Looks like a decent plane. Can't download it now, but will try to if I remember later

  • Mig21 11 months ago

    Actually now that I look at it, there are prototypes with swept wings

  • Mig21 11 months ago

    Quick note, you know the Mig-21 was a delta wing, right? It didn't have swept wings

  • F16C-52 11 months ago

    What phone are you on, my guy? my phone would explode if i had this many parts.

  • DAC-21 D "Birdbunk" Supersonic Multi-role Aircraft. 11 months ago

    Thanks to @LuminoxBiotechCompany for the free HUD design

  • A-8 Crusader 11 months ago

    it looks really good. if the canopy moved forward a little, it might look better, but overall it's really good

  • 5 HUD Pack 11 months ago

    Hey bro, just used one of these on my plane. You can check it out if you want.

  • DAC-21 B-3 "Birdbunk" 11 months ago

    Also, feel free to add any suggestions for future features on variations of this.

  • DAC-21 11 months ago

    Also, I will be updating it and adding different variants. I will try to make one with custom missiles, and a more detailed interior. That, and I think it would be cool to add a functioning nose cone as well as more guns. Will post more when available.