@TheOfficalMarylander @LunarEclipseSP to shorten it, Project [PEA] is for everyone in the community, to go against that is to go against myself; it is distasteful yes, and i would kindly tell him.. actually fuck being kind, GO DIE IN A DITCH
now you can permalink this comment and send it to the stale ass bread dead husk of a decapitated parrot sonofabitch he is; report it all you want, FUCK HIM
@Speedhunter per technically, XCH-62 is an Oneesan cause y'know, beeg, but also an Imouto cause y'know, she's younger XD; long story short, Soviets have the Mil Mi-26, USA envy, USA maek beeg copter, USA win!!! (except XCH-62 was only a prototype, and it isn't even finished.. unless you count 95% as finished, depends really.)
@Mousewithamachinegun123 it's like necromancy, except a failed one, so it's more like grave raiding, dubiously less legal, although I'm pretty sure necromancy is illegal anyway so what difference does an extra time make?
@OkaNieba VTOL huh, may work, but then there's the landing phase(if it is activated by altitude, or speed); also, thanks! quite happy how it turned out ( ^▽^ )
@LunarEclipseSP quite so, and I'm not sure it's Gen Z, more so Gen Alpha(alpha my arse), like I love weird stuff, but whatever they cooked made me recoil back whether it be of disgust or just confusion, doesn't help that err.. per technically G-word is somewhat an inappropriate word, at best a PG-13 one, these kids are a menace and not in a good way kek
I think I'll join with Ohio, but... not your normal Ohio~ ima make it fly because physics doesn't physic in Ohio, for the hell of it XD
adorable is an understatement, that's one of my favourite Warspite post around now lel
everytime I hear those words I swear I take a hit to my HP, like I know embrace your whimsy and all, BUT NOT THIS KIND OF IT, IS THIS WHAT THE OLD PEOPLES FEEL ABOUT US!???
jokes aside, great ship! love it ( > ~ < )
and holy mother of interplanetary delights that Smolspite model IS CUTE, hrrrnnggghhhh- i feel diabetic all of a sudden-
also, quick correction about the model for the ultimate accuracy(she's my favourite ship after all, both IRL and wherever), the iron spike on her head is a straight hard-edged spike, as hinted in this two pics pic1 and pic2
depends on a few stuff, functionally though, it's basically an unstable plane with a Fly-By-Wire correction via FT, Guyfolk has a great tut for it, Artificial Stability and PSM
would something like this be allowed? it is a fiction atmospheric fighter-interceptor aircraft from a game called "DuelX", from what ive theorised, it's basically a naval fighter-interceptor except the carrier is a spaceship; it is likely deployed as a cheap alternative compared to fully space-fighters, depending on the type of mission, it may be launched from space too and ascend back to mothership with its wing-mounted rocket boosters although it does seem like it lacks any significant space-navigating thrusters, likely only minimal for orientation purposes and such
lastly, the fighter's name is Needle Point Binder, is it allowed?
@DatTrainGuy19 yeah, i quite remember that.. eugh, creeped out is an understatement no? quite a stale-ass cringe damp toast of a mf, maidenless kindergarten-tempered quackity twat
@AtlasAir747MyBeloved you know what, I've written it down, I've put it on my list... i don't like fucking parrots and I will never make the Corsair just to fucking spite you, who tf writes it as "F-4U" anyway, you're stupid.
@Majakalona per technically, Yamato is a ship so it's not exactly PEA, however, it is TGT.. the problem is... Yamato is a very large ship, meaning a very extensive long development time, in comparison, the largest ship I've made from ground up is Teste and it took me around 7 days, and that's the A-III system only, we have yet to mention the A-IV system, Thonburi and Handclams both took me a decent amount of development time alone, to top it off... neither of them are battleship-sized, at largest the only have 6FA-2WA buoyancy arrangement, meanwhile a proper battleship, even the smallest one, would have 10FA-3WA atleast, not to mention there's an overarching problem that is... impactDamageScalar, unless the ship is heavy, it'll get pushed around, and thats a terrible problem... making it heavier creates another problem, making them have less health also has it's own problems, there's a lot really... which is why I'm putting ships on hold, it's just too much development time for a terrible payout in form of many things.. that's my rant for the night, have a good day/evening/time, I'm off to sleep
they cool af, efficient, not wasteful, and perfect for urban/suburban(fewk that) duties, of course, off roading is out the question but i mean come on, the worst you can find is probably a dirt road and it could still reliably travel through it, if younhave to drive across a vigorous rocky terrain with lakes waters and whatnot, you gotta ask yourself why, cause nearly all the time you don't need such capabilities in this modern age, except old murican trucks cause murican countryside is a different story-ish
@DatTrainGuy19 oh, same as me back then back when then lmao
i bought the mobile version back when it was heavily discounted, like, 19.000rb, can you believe that?; i had an old legacy PC back and it barely runs SP on the lowest setting(which is highest on mobile), that's also the reason i made a lot of target ships back them, it is somewhat more convenient, but I still prefer Mobile cause dictionary shortcut lmao (e.g. i set up a lot of shortcuts, such as "lp" for >>CameraManagerScript..SetCameraFov, or"pl" for Fuselage-Body-1, such and such.)
yes, i have pirated SP, i immediately bought the game when i was able to, but i did pirate SP.. i didn't bought it on the PC thouh, i pirated that one
@DatTrainGuy19 car-centricism i suppose, go bigger or go home cause y'know, smol means crushable.. and pickups/SUVs... OH DONT LET ME START MY RANT- they're classified as a light truck.. meaning they are dangerous both ways, how? CARS CRUMPLE TO SAVE YO ASS, SUV/PICKUPS DONT BECAUSE HEEHEEHOOHOO THEY STRONG FRAME I LIFT AND AAAAAA
@Mousewithamachinegun123 quite so, quite so... but he left with a bang, hell, a bang is an understatement, he literally shifted a tectonic plate goddamn!
@VeroViper curious, so basically make it out of sub 5-5-5_SP fuselage scale only fuselage parts right? I'll try it out maybe tomorrow and see
+2@TheOfficalMarylander @LunarEclipseSP to shorten it, Project [PEA] is for everyone in the community, to go against that is to go against myself; it is distasteful yes, and i would kindly tell him.. actually fuck being kind, GO DIE IN A DITCH
now you can permalink this comment and send it to the stale ass bread dead husk of a decapitated parrot sonofabitch he is; report it all you want, FUCK HIM
+2@Speedhunter per technically, XCH-62 is an Oneesan cause y'know, beeg, but also an Imouto cause y'know, she's younger XD; long story short, Soviets have the Mil Mi-26, USA envy, USA maek beeg copter, USA win!!! (except XCH-62 was only a prototype, and it isn't even finished.. unless you count 95% as finished, depends really.)
+2@OkaNieba HOLY HAH, THANK YOU, ULTRA EFFICIENCY GO BRRR
+2love how this looks, good work! ( >▽< )
+2@Mousewithamachinegun123 it's like necromancy, except a failed one, so it's more like grave raiding, dubiously less legal, although I'm pretty sure necromancy is illegal anyway so what difference does an extra time make?
+2@Mousewithamachinegun123 it's like trampling the dead, but I can't say i don't enjoy it, lets disturb the deceased
+2@OkaNieba @LJh1 @Kerbango GOOD NEWS, I MADE IT FLIPEWKOOWEEN WORK, NOW IT HAS SHORT TAKEOFF HAAA
+2@OkaNieba VTOL huh, may work, but then there's the landing phase(if it is activated by altitude, or speed); also, thanks! quite happy how it turned out ( ^▽^ )
+2@LJh1 oh, thank you! ( > ~ < )
+2@Speedhunter goddarn, HOW ARE YOU OMNIPRESENT!?? XD
+2@LunarEclipseSP quite so, and I'm not sure it's Gen Z, more so Gen Alpha(alpha my arse), like I love weird stuff, but whatever they cooked made me recoil back whether it be of disgust or just confusion, doesn't help that err.. per technically G-word is somewhat an inappropriate word, at best a PG-13 one, these kids are a menace and not in a good way kek
I think I'll join with Ohio, but... not your normal Ohio~ ima make it fly because physics doesn't physic in Ohio, for the hell of it XD
adorable is an understatement, that's one of my favourite Warspite post around now lel
np, cheers 🍺( ^▽^ )
+2everytime I hear those words I swear I take a hit to my HP, like I know embrace your whimsy and all, BUT NOT THIS KIND OF IT, IS THIS WHAT THE OLD PEOPLES FEEL ABOUT US!???
jokes aside, great ship! love it ( > ~ < )
and holy mother of interplanetary delights that Smolspite model IS CUTE, hrrrnnggghhhh- i feel diabetic all of a sudden-
also, quick correction about the model for the ultimate accuracy(she's my favourite ship after all, both IRL and wherever), the iron spike on her head is a straight hard-edged spike, as hinted in this two pics pic1 and pic2
+2anyway, Grumman do always be makin the best warheads-on-foreheads options available, even when they're not supposed to ahem
+2@LunarEclipseSP mmm, Monarchy
+2love this, good work ( >▽< )
+2honhonhon
+2life is whimsical, for better or for worse, eitherway it IS very whimsical
+2depends on a few stuff, functionally though, it's basically an unstable plane with a Fly-By-Wire correction via FT, Guyfolk has a great tut for it, Artificial Stability and PSM
+2would something like this be allowed? it is a fiction atmospheric fighter-interceptor aircraft from a game called "DuelX", from what ive theorised, it's basically a naval fighter-interceptor except the carrier is a spaceship; it is likely deployed as a cheap alternative compared to fully space-fighters, depending on the type of mission, it may be launched from space too and ascend back to mothership with its wing-mounted rocket boosters although it does seem like it lacks any significant space-navigating thrusters, likely only minimal for orientation purposes and such
lastly, the fighter's name is Needle Point Binder, is it allowed?
+2that pink looks so squishable ( > ~ < )
+2okay I pull up
+2@Speedhunter alright, tomato it is XD
+2idk why i i immediately thought of MMMM TOMATOES forgive me
+2entry listed in collection, thanks! ( ^▽^ )
also that cockpit trick is damn fine, ill steal it now XD
+2@KSB24 ah ahem, don't you guys like eat spicy stuff to like, refresh yourself? or am i too stereotypical?
+2@LunarEclipseSP it's probably fine tbh, but if it's for the best then hey, why not? still doesn't change the fact anyway lmao, anyway.. what now
+2@WritersCrusadersAirCo man's a creep, whaddya want me to say? I feel uncomfortable enough to block him, AND I DONT BLOCK PEOPLE
+2@DatTrainGuy19 yeah, i quite remember that.. eugh, creeped out is an understatement no? quite a stale-ass cringe damp toast of a mf, maidenless kindergarten-tempered quackity twat
+2@AtlasAir747MyBeloved you know what, I've written it down, I've put it on my list... i don't like fucking parrots and I will never make the Corsair just to fucking spite you, who tf writes it as "F-4U" anyway, you're stupid.
+2Congratulations! ( >▽< )
+2hon hon hon, truly the beeg ( >▽< )
+2lomng
also, new pfp eh? hmh
+2@Graingy do you need some cough candy? you sound... horse :P
+2@Majakalona per technically, Yamato is a ship so it's not exactly PEA, however, it is TGT.. the problem is... Yamato is a very large ship, meaning a very extensive long development time, in comparison, the largest ship I've made from ground up is Teste and it took me around 7 days, and that's the A-III system only, we have yet to mention the A-IV system, Thonburi and Handclams both took me a decent amount of development time alone, to top it off... neither of them are battleship-sized, at largest the only have 6FA-2WA buoyancy arrangement, meanwhile a proper battleship, even the smallest one, would have 10FA-3WA atleast, not to mention there's an overarching problem that is... impactDamageScalar, unless the ship is heavy, it'll get pushed around, and thats a terrible problem... making it heavier creates another problem, making them have less health also has it's own problems, there's a lot really... which is why I'm putting ships on hold, it's just too much development time for a terrible payout in form of many things.. that's my rant for the night, have a good day/evening/time, I'm off to sleep
+2@001 my submission, successor is wack so I'm waiting for re-successoring
+2@MrSilverWolf can you make this a successor to this challenge?, thanks in advance ( ^▽^ )
+2@LunarEclipseSP yea, it's on one of my builds, quite useful for floaties, rocket helipad
+2anyway... don't t'cha reckon the maneuverability is a bit too much? rates rather fast
+2they cool af, efficient, not wasteful, and perfect for urban/suburban(fewk that) duties, of course, off roading is out the question but i mean come on, the worst you can find is probably a dirt road and it could still reliably travel through it, if younhave to drive across a vigorous rocky terrain with lakes waters and whatnot, you gotta ask yourself why, cause nearly all the time you don't need such capabilities in this modern age, except old murican trucks cause murican countryside is a different story-ish
+2.33 seconds/s i think, or 0.33 speed
+2bro USS Langley has better supports 💀💀💀
i quite like the silhouette though, it's oddly menacing
+2mmm, whimsical
+2@WritersCrusadersAirCo it's not you who is wrong, its just me being an outlier in gaining points
+2@CR929thenewSPplayer and you too, whimsy man, thanks for the spotlite ( >▽< )
+2@DatTrainGuy19 oh, same as me back then back when then lmao
i bought the mobile version back when it was heavily discounted, like, 19.000rb, can you believe that?; i had an old legacy PC back and it barely runs SP on the lowest setting(which is highest on mobile), that's also the reason i made a lot of target ships back them, it is somewhat more convenient, but I still prefer Mobile cause dictionary shortcut lmao (e.g. i set up a lot of shortcuts, such as "lp" for >>CameraManagerScript..SetCameraFov, or"pl" for Fuselage-Body-1, such and such.)
yes, i have pirated SP, i immediately bought the game when i was able to, but i did pirate SP.. i didn't bought it on the PC thouh, i pirated that one
+2@DatTrainGuy19 I just envy specifically the clear waters and... underwater camera, i build ships man, the sea looks bland in mobile TwT
+2@DatTrainGuy19 car-centricism i suppose, go bigger or go home cause y'know, smol means crushable.. and pickups/SUVs... OH DONT LET ME START MY RANT- they're classified as a light truck.. meaning they are dangerous both ways, how? CARS CRUMPLE TO SAVE YO ASS, SUV/PICKUPS DONT BECAUSE HEEHEEHOOHOO THEY STRONG FRAME I LIFT AND AAAAAA
+2@Mousewithamachinegun123 for now. >:P
+2@Mousewithamachinegun123 quite so, quite so... but he left with a bang, hell, a bang is an understatement, he literally shifted a tectonic plate goddamn!
+2