The inaccurate thing is that the MiG-15 didn’t have afterburners, in which this post does. I don’t really care because XML allows resizing of afterburning flames(?).
@WinsWings The Soviets used a German engine as well. Also now I’m convinced the MiG-15 is a stretched non-egg version of this plane.
BUT WOW THAT WAS A FAST REPLY
Nobody needs the link to the original plane.
Also doing this without permission will near certainly give you problems. I recommend you delete this post soon.
This tank is to protect the area surrounding the nation, along with hundreds of thousands of active soldiers. Around 500,000 soldiers are in reserve as well. Thousands of deployable mines and compact tank traps line the bridges and fences bordering the country. This tank is just one of the many single-person semi-autonomous armed forces vehicles and serves as a quick way to gain territory back from an enemy.
I’m thinking the 797 will have the -8 and -9, following the 777X and 787. It would likely have a 3 by 3 layout with seats slightly tilting towards the center of the aircraft to save space. Carrying 210 passengers in a 2-class layout with a wingspan around 20 feet shorter than the A330 including raked wingtips and advanced aerodynamics to decrease fuel burn, it’d be a massive workhorse, especially with airlines like Icelandair. The engine options (if we only have access to the engines today) would be between the Pratt and Whitney PW1524G and the CFM LEAP-1B. The plane will be made out of mostly composite materials and also offering an ER version with auxiliary fuel tanks. The sheer weight would need a double bogey landing gear and the windows would be, I’d guess, the same as the 777. And to cut boarding times, there would be 3 entrance/exit doors. I believe the A321XLR will be able to compete with the 797-9 alone, as the capacity most likely beats range in the 797.
NOOOOO IM GONNA LOSE THIS CHALLENGE
AGHHHHHHHHHHHH
@RepublicOfCursedPlanes it’d be fun to see a plane made out of this
Engines are well-made. Everything is. And never forget, it’s our plane.
+2If you hear this lumbering giant, you know it’s either run away or boom.
And I’m talking about the Polikarpov Po-2.
In my opinion this is literally just a European-built F-14. Except lots of them operate on land and have thrust reversing.
+3When will we update the A350-1000?
My tooth fell out when my computer tried running this.
PLS HELP ME WAAAHHHHHHHH
I thought the name was the LSR, not the SSC.
+2I know it used to be called the SSC.
PANCAKES BETTER
At this point I think just the cockpit itself would make my device crash.
I know what a kilometer is, but
WHAT DA FAK IS A KILOMETREEEEEEEEEE(eagle)EEEEEEEEEEEEE?
MiG-15 F*got? @Ren
+1I polish poles.
+1Poles?
poles or Poles?
Do noobs use this plane to start a new one?
+1Also the fact the performance cost is still 1 yet the part count is 0 gets me.
To make this post one able to be downloaded on mobile devices, I recommend using the text tracks used on my tank. (MPGV-1A4) It’s really nice.
为了使这篇文章能够在移动设备上下载，我建议使用我的坦克上使用的文字轨迹。(MPGV-1A4) 真的很不错。(Baidu Translate)
+5The inaccurate thing is that the MiG-15 didn’t have afterburners, in which this post does. I don’t really care because XML allows resizing of afterburning flames(?).
It would also be cool if the somewhat-related R160/R179 of the NYC Subway were posted.
I also just realized the deadline is 4 days after my birthday.
+1If my F-87 were working right now, that would be my entry.
@WinsWings The Soviets used a German engine as well. Also now I’m convinced the MiG-15 is a stretched non-egg version of this plane.
+1BUT WOW THAT WAS A FAST REPLY
Meggkoyan-Gurevich Megg-15!
my cannon was bigger but i used xml
this is pretty good
Nobody needs the link to the original plane.
+1Also doing this without permission will near certainly give you problems. I recommend you delete this post soon.
@PlaneFlightX The entire canard besides the control surfaces aren’t working.
@PlaneFlightX For some reason the main canard part still isn’t working. I haven’t discovered the connection editor yet either.
@SPAircraftOfficial Here.
@konbanwa that’s what she said
@xNotDumb WAIT WHAT DO YOU MEAN BY THAT
+1(SS Marschiert ein Feindesland and Erika in the background)
Do the Dassault Mirage 2000 in 2000 parts
+1Wait nevermind
Do the IAI Kfir in Kfir parts (IMPOSSIBLE)
BABY FALCON 🥰
+1Kylian Mbappé Lotin
+1Антонов Ан-124-100
@TheCommentaryGuy just not made in china (-100000 social credit) EXECUTION TIMER: 09:59:59
@Bryan5 ok
+1crister ronaldo sewy
If the F-16 and Eurofighter Typhoon had a baby:
+2This tank is to protect the area surrounding the nation, along with hundreds of thousands of active soldiers. Around 500,000 soldiers are in reserve as well. Thousands of deployable mines and compact tank traps line the bridges and fences bordering the country. This tank is just one of the many single-person semi-autonomous armed forces vehicles and serves as a quick way to gain territory back from an enemy.
@Graingy I need one of these ‘polevs now!
+2Missing the yellow stripe bordering the white and the blue, just saying btw
+1My text images aren’t working. Whenever I even try, nothing shows up.
May I submit a military livery?
RESPECT BRUDDA 🫡
+1If the HondaJet had an airliner brother:
I’m SO CLOSE to getting bronze!
I’m thinking the 797 will have the -8 and -9, following the 777X and 787. It would likely have a 3 by 3 layout with seats slightly tilting towards the center of the aircraft to save space. Carrying 210 passengers in a 2-class layout with a wingspan around 20 feet shorter than the A330 including raked wingtips and advanced aerodynamics to decrease fuel burn, it’d be a massive workhorse, especially with airlines like Icelandair. The engine options (if we only have access to the engines today) would be between the Pratt and Whitney PW1524G and the CFM LEAP-1B. The plane will be made out of mostly composite materials and also offering an ER version with auxiliary fuel tanks. The sheer weight would need a double bogey landing gear and the windows would be, I’d guess, the same as the 777. And to cut boarding times, there would be 3 entrance/exit doors. I believe the A321XLR will be able to compete with the 797-9 alone, as the capacity most likely beats range in the 797.
@Pilotgoose but with a smol prop
How in the hell does my iPad run this?
Also, why did you like my first post?
+1Can you do the German A350 (to contrast from basically any other government aircraft)?
+1May I reskin this tank and upload it? It would be a breeze to make a tank with this. I’m also going to add infinite flares to improve the tank.