@RepublicofWrightIsles If I understand correctly you wanted to make a Horten 18 with vertical stabilizer.
If that's the question, you can definitely make a better version of Horten 18. However, do not forget to emphasize that this feature is not supported in the real design.
2- Movement Performance:+4 points (It's enough agile but not fast enough. Also doesn't have flaps or trim)
3- Weapons:+4 points (It hasn't got a cannon and your custom missiles are exploding itself when you fire it at wrong angle. Also there are not any countermeasure dispansers.)
4- Post Content:+5 points (Thumbnail is ok. Info is good but there are not any photos or controls. )
5- Is it fun to play?:+4 points (Apperence is not well and cannon issue is a problem.)
@SPsidearm OK
@mechakevina Yes but don't forget to give a credit for it.
@SPsidearm Can't you just edit XML and set explosion scale over 50?
@SPsidearm Is it nuclear?
• Design (2 points)
• Yeah, low effort
• Movement Performance (4 points)
• Not so mobile, but a giant lence is not intended to be that mobile.
• Weapons (5 points)
• Tracers are ok but it would be better to scale gun down to hide, also decrease the flash scale.
• Post Content (2 points)
• You know
• Playability (4 points)
• Not bad
Total: 17/50
@SPsidearm Sure
@Xper1m3ntal
@Xper1m3ntal
1) Find the image you want to add from Chrome or upload from your device to internet. (I use ibb.co to upload)
2) Right click (or long click at mobile) on picture and open in new tab.
3) Copy the URL from the top bar.
4)  paste your URL between brackets.
If you do it properly it will look like this
 and apper as image
@Numbers2
.
.
.
My honest reaction to Genova Convention
.
.
.
.
(Nvr mind that was a joke)
Man, i'm not able to accept this things as superweapons.
(Definition: Superweapon)
Can u make it a functional weapon. (Let it explode)
@Thatrando Sure, that's why there is a KV-222 in the thumbnail
@RepublicofWrightIsles If I understand correctly you wanted to make a Horten 18 with vertical stabilizer.
If that's the question, you can definitely make a better version of Horten 18. However, do not forget to emphasize that this feature is not supported in the real design.
What is wrong with it?
@foury @SPsidearm Yes you can make any type of nuclear missiles
• Design (2 points)
• Looks really cursed.
• Movement Performance (2 points)
• Controls are reversed and wings are flapping.
• Weapons (3 points)
• The main gun is cool but poorly designed.
• Post Content (2 points)
• You should try thumbnail with background, in-game pictures, more detailed info. and control details.
• Playability (2 points)
• Even i can't properly control it, sorry but it's not that enjoyible to play.
Total: 11/50
@SPsidearm @Xper1m3ntal @LowQualityRepublic As i mentioned in rules part -you can look at images too- you are allowed to build what you want.
JUST BUILD A SUPERWEAPON
@VulpesDynamics They are both OK to build. But as a SW Battlefront II player I will chose Operation Cinder Satellites.
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 it's open for fictional builds too and i think nuclear weapons are superweapons too
But there are lots of pictures in photo gallery. Check again @MAHADI
@MAHADI Images from photo gallery?
You are not supposed to see them in the game.
@Logontery > Here it is <
@Logontery Just wait a little bit
@foury @Hahahahaahahshs @EmpireofWrightIsles @RedTrinity
Thanks Guys
@Logontery I am working on the post
CHALLENGE ENDED!
Winner Team: NATO
1st: @cyon
2nd:@ComradeComissar
3rd:@NermalTheBoy20
1- Design: +2 points (Simpleplane)
2- Movement Performance: +3 (Pitch and roll are unbalanced)
3- Weapons: +5 points (normal)
4- Post Content: +4 points (nice history)
5- Is it enjoyable to play?: +4 points (Not so much)
6- Replica: +0 points (no)
7- Secret achievement: +10 points (🦅🦅)
Total:28
1- Design: +3 points (Simple)
2- Movement Performance: +4 (Uncomfortable)
3- Weapons: +3 points (Only a low rpm gun)
4- Post Content: +3 points (Only Thumbnail)
5- Is it enjoyable to play?: +4 points
6- Replica: +10 points (yes)
7- Secret achievement: +10 points (🦅🦅)
Total:37
Part count is too low for submission
1- Design: +8 points (Just good)
2- Movement Performance: +8 (Enough agile)
3- Weapons: +8 points (Realistic)
4- Post Content: +7 points (There are not any photos in gallery??)
5- Is it enjoyable to play?: +8 points (Yes)
6- Replica: +10 points (yes)
7- Secret achievement: +10 points (🦅🦅)
Total:59
1- Design: +7 points (Perfect interior)
2- Movement Performance: +7 (Good)
3- Weapons: +9 points (Try camera aim for turrets)
4- Post Content: +9 points (Good job)
5- Is it enjoyable to play?: +8 points (Yes.)
6- Replica: +10 points (yes)
7- Secret achievement: +10 points (🦅🦅)
Total:60
Announcement:
I have to finish the judging of the Cold War Challenge, then I will post KAAN.
@Logontery Sağol
So Cool
@Meatloa Toggle camera to find gun cameras. You can use them to aim. (Try zooming for precise aiming) It can easily destroy USS Beast's carrier group.
@Meatloa It's a seaplane. It hasn't got landing gears. Try Water takeoff.
@cyon Thanks
Thank you all guys.
Scoring
(Pin this up)
1- Design: + 4 points (It's a good pea again but it looks like Mirage 3000 more than F-102.)
2- Movement Performance: +9 points (Accellerating very realisticly and also very stable.)
3- Weapons: +6 points (Ralistic default weapons.)
4- Post Content: +7 points (Only problem is shortness of text. Add control list and a longer description.)
5- Is it fun to play?: +6 points (Not bad.)
6- Replica: +10 points (Yes.)
7- Secret achievement: +10 points (Communist killer)
Total:
52 points
Ok
@Rb2h What is the problem? They are working.
Rated post
Scoring
(Pin this up)
1- Design: + 2 points (Simple design.)
2- Movement Performance: + 5 points (Not that agile.)
3- Weapons: + 7 points (Too much missiles and these guns r going brrttt.)
4- Post Content: +2 points (I cant see anything.)
5- Is it fun to play?: +5 points (Not perfect but i like guns.)
6- Replica: +0 points (No)
7- Secret achievement: +10 points (wth is a km? 🇺🇲🇺🇲🦅🦅)
Total:
31 points
@TTL It seems perfect!
Scoring
(Pin this up)
1- Design: + 2 points (So Cursed💀)
2- Movement Performance: +2 points (Gyroscopes are uncomfortable.)
3- Weapons: +4 points (Missles are only normal things. Wth are this miniguns.(Brrrt))
4- Post Content: +2 points (I don't have to say anything.)
5- Is it fun to play?: +2 points (Nooo.)
6- Replica: +10 points (0)
7- Secret achievement: +10 points (Uh. Yes)
Total:
32 points
Scoreboard:
NATO:
776
WTO:
340
Scoring
(Pin this up)
1- Design: + 2 points (So simple)
2- Movement Performance: +4 points (It's enough agile but not fast enough. Also doesn't have flaps or trim)
3- Weapons: +4 points (It hasn't got a cannon and your custom missiles are exploding itself when you fire it at wrong angle. Also there are not any countermeasure dispansers.)
4- Post Content: +5 points (Thumbnail is ok. Info is good but there are not any photos or controls. )
5- Is it fun to play?: +4 points (Apperence is not well and cannon issue is a problem.)
6- Replica: +10 points (yes)
7- Secret achievement: +10 points (🦅🦅🦅)
Total:
39 points
Scoring
(Pin this up)
1- Design: + 1 points (Blocky and simple.)
2- Movement Performance: +5 points (Normal.)
3- Weapons: +5 points (Simple.)
4- Post Content: +3 points (Yeet!)
5- Is it fun to play?: +2 points (Actually no becouse its so simple.)
6- Replica: +0 points (0)
7- Secret achievement: +10 points (Maybe... )
Total:
26 points
@RepublicofWrightIsles yes
Can u add 7 more parts to make it 50?
I built TAI Hürjet Combat variant too. Its here