The drawback to me is cluttered upload pages; as it shows different variations of the same aircraft, and I prefer to just have a list of all the different creations. This is probably only an issue to me, but everyone has their quirks! I don’t find your way unprofessional, it’s just (going back to the cluttered upload page) not professional in the way that defines the way I organise my profile (everyone has different ways of being professional.) Inappropriate was said in a different context that is widely used, I simply meant that we have seperate methods, and there’s nothing wrong with that.
An interesting conclusion, I too find that when I post mobile friendly versions as unlisted they don’t get as many downloads, but my attempts to find whether they’re are more mobile or PC users are inconclusive. I wouldn’t upload it as mobile friendly, but that’s just me, and I like to keep matters strictly professional. I can understand your way of operating, and I respect that; but as I said, it was not a criticism, simply a suggestion. Making it more accessible has its benefits, but to me the drawbacks outweigh other methods, though to you I can see it’s different. We all have seperate procedures to deal with such anomalies, and I respect yours as I hope you respect mine. It was not meant to be offensive in any way, and I hope you are not vexed by the comment. No hard feelings? @SledDriver
I don’t have anything against upvotes, it’s just that the original (which I really like) is the main source, and that a mobile version is a secondary, ‘lite’, version that is accessed by those incapable of running the original. Because of this, I feel as if it’s innaprioate to get upvotes for a simpler version of a more complex version which is existent. The people who enjoy the mobile one should upvote the normal one, and that’s an efficient, easy to run system that results in one creation that everyone can access and upvote, and another which is accessible through the first. I don’t have an issue with what you’re doing, it’s just a suggestion, not a criticism @SledDriver
Just a suggestion, you should probably upload the mobile version as unlisted and have a link to it in the description of the standard version; that way you don’t get multiple extra upvotes from the same design
In all seriousness, does selecting a sphere, increasing its size and painting it pink deserve two upvotes? @Carsong1017 @ghosthunter1999 by the way I know it’s just a joke, but still...
Have a go! I remember when I first started (about 2 and a half years ago, before I made my account) I just wondered how anybody could make things like all the top players... back then I pretty much used only single fuselage blocks for the body, the stock cockpits for the cockpit (I can’t believe I used to do that!) and the blocky stock wings! Since then I practised, and looked at experienced players builds, and got better and better, and look where I am now! Making fully functional cockpits in High detailed aircraft! I can see potential for great skills in your builds, just give it a go and even if it doesn’t work out, at least it’s practise as you get better and better! @MrDoolittle
Use lots of details, adding small decals (even if you don’t make them) and fuselage inlets nudged into the body go a long way to making your builds look better! Also, with wings, put thin fuselage blocks over the actual wing, it creates a more realistic looking wing and also allows you to detail them much better (stripes, decals, nails... etc)
I know, it’s just a shame that the devs didn’t have the foresight in the very beginning to allow for multiplayer when they were first developing SP @JMicah4
Sounds great, unfortunately the devs seem to be adamant that they will not add multiplayer... it’s a shame and I have no idea why; but I suppose that’s just the way it is
Thanks! That was a lot of passion in describing the detail :) @ForeverPie
The drawback to me is cluttered upload pages; as it shows different variations of the same aircraft, and I prefer to just have a list of all the different creations. This is probably only an issue to me, but everyone has their quirks! I don’t find your way unprofessional, it’s just (going back to the cluttered upload page) not professional in the way that defines the way I organise my profile (everyone has different ways of being professional.) Inappropriate was said in a different context that is widely used, I simply meant that we have seperate methods, and there’s nothing wrong with that.
Great! It’s a very important step to make as it allows you to detail them very well! @Stellarlabs
An interesting conclusion, I too find that when I post mobile friendly versions as unlisted they don’t get as many downloads, but my attempts to find whether they’re are more mobile or PC users are inconclusive. I wouldn’t upload it as mobile friendly, but that’s just me, and I like to keep matters strictly professional. I can understand your way of operating, and I respect that; but as I said, it was not a criticism, simply a suggestion. Making it more accessible has its benefits, but to me the drawbacks outweigh other methods, though to you I can see it’s different. We all have seperate procedures to deal with such anomalies, and I respect yours as I hope you respect mine. It was not meant to be offensive in any way, and I hope you are not vexed by the comment. No hard feelings? @SledDriver
I don’t have anything against upvotes, it’s just that the original (which I really like) is the main source, and that a mobile version is a secondary, ‘lite’, version that is accessed by those incapable of running the original. Because of this, I feel as if it’s innaprioate to get upvotes for a simpler version of a more complex version which is existent. The people who enjoy the mobile one should upvote the normal one, and that’s an efficient, easy to run system that results in one creation that everyone can access and upvote, and another which is accessible through the first. I don’t have an issue with what you’re doing, it’s just a suggestion, not a criticism @SledDriver
Just a suggestion, you should probably upload the mobile version as unlisted and have a link to it in the description of the standard version; that way you don’t get multiple extra upvotes from the same design
Interesting and original concept, nice!
@Pilotmario do you think I could order a J15 that is 14.5x more powerful and 4x more efficient as these are? Thanks!
@BaconRoll Interesting video... but thanks! @Awsomur thanks
Pretty good, a few extra details might be nice though!
@Tully2001 @CoolPeach Thankyou
Great job! A glossy gun metal frame would look really beast on this build!
I like it! A few extra details on the deck would be nice, but overall great job
Really nice job on the details! Great work on this one
Nice, but I would have much preferred if you’d incorporated this into an aircraft that you made
Great job, especially on the cockpit! A few outside details wouldn’t go amiss but overall it’s a well done build
In all seriousness, does selecting a sphere, increasing its size and painting it pink deserve two upvotes? @Carsong1017 @ghosthunter1999 by the way I know it’s just a joke, but still...
Great! @Flightsonic
Could I enter a jet I am working on that has XML edited equipment on it? Here’s a very early prototype
Definitely! :) @MrDoolittle
Have a go! I remember when I first started (about 2 and a half years ago, before I made my account) I just wondered how anybody could make things like all the top players... back then I pretty much used only single fuselage blocks for the body, the stock cockpits for the cockpit (I can’t believe I used to do that!) and the blocky stock wings! Since then I practised, and looked at experienced players builds, and got better and better, and look where I am now! Making fully functional cockpits in High detailed aircraft! I can see potential for great skills in your builds, just give it a go and even if it doesn’t work out, at least it’s practise as you get better and better! @MrDoolittle
Fair enough then, I really like the cannon, a great test-bed for further creations that might implement it @MrDoolittle
Great, I mentioned you on the unlisted prototype I’ve made @Razor3278
I love extreme landings, got the full version despite how expensive it is!
An Alfa Romeo 4C would be a fairer comparison, it would be an interesting matchup
Thanks @ACMECo1940
This would be a great, yet simple to implement addition to the game
Use lots of details, adding small decals (even if you don’t make them) and fuselage inlets nudged into the body go a long way to making your builds look better! Also, with wings, put thin fuselage blocks over the actual wing, it creates a more realistic looking wing and also allows you to detail them much better (stripes, decals, nails... etc)
@BogdanX agreed, if you’re going to enter a challenge, actually be competitive; otherwise what’s the point of entering?
@Razor3278 I’m working on the main body of our collaboration, want to enter it into this challenge when it’s finished?
Nice job on the small details, maybe opt for a more militarised colour though
Thanks! A lot of effort went into it! @Dynamicneedle
Good job on this one
A 16mph (25km/h) stall is very impressive, good job on the flight characteristics
@AndrewGarrison
I know, it’s just a shame that the devs didn’t have the foresight in the very beginning to allow for multiplayer when they were first developing SP @JMicah4
Sounds great, unfortunately the devs seem to be adamant that they will not add multiplayer... it’s a shame and I have no idea why; but I suppose that’s just the way it is
Also, you can use the nudge tool to place extra fuel into fuselage blocks if you want to get a bit more advanced
Wow! Yeah I do like the design a lot, good job on this @dillonmanyo
Yeah I know, I’m just saying that it’s overkill (in a good way) because it has 14 miniguns @dillonmanyo
The very definition of overkill
I approve
Sad to see you go
Nevertheless it’s an interesting contraption @robloxweponco
Yes I was runnnig high on everything as well @robloxweponco
I think me and Razor might enter
Sounds good! @Razor3278
Great, so which of us should do the main body, and which should do the detailing? @Razor3278
Hey I know that you’ve finished THIS collab, but would you like to do another one?
Yeah definitely @Razor3278