15.1k Rodrigo110 Comments

  • Boomclock Mini Alpha 7.0 years ago

    Interesting contraption!

  • P-22D Stormraider "Ace of Diamonds" 7.0 years ago

    Beautiful design and detailing! Great job on this one, your builds are getting better and better!

  • Status update #1 7.0 years ago

    What a ridiculous situation, Free speech = getting expelled for saying a joke? Man that’s so rough, I’m so sorry for you

  • Meet our group! 7.0 years ago

    Use fuselage blocks, don’t use stock wings or engines, try different building styles, never cut corners when building, paint creations aesthetically pleasingly but not over the top, try to make a frame (this is just a building style suggestion that I use) and then go from there with panels and fuselage blocks (look at my Phalanx, guillemot, Cormorant, Hoplite and Condor to see how that’s done) and always put effort into your work! Go from there and your building skills will become bigger as you get more recognition here on the SP website

    Hope this was helpful

  • DMRI “Phalanx” Mk IX 7.0 years ago

    Yes, your creations are really good! Your CV-26S packed great aesthetic and performance all in one! @Dimkal

  • DMRI “Evia” BC II 7.0 years ago

    Yeah, it was confusing me as to why it was happening... most of my creations only work on high physics! @Lylian

  • Delivery Challange 7.0 years ago

    By the way, you misspelt the title. It’s spelt ‘challenge’ not ‘challange’

  • AF-1a Janitor 7.0 years ago

    Really great! But I think it would have looked even better if the engine was nudged more into the fuselage

  • New moab 7.0 years ago

    Really nice! Good job on this one!

  • CV-26S Nessus 7.0 years ago

    Great design!

  • RDG “Hoplite” EB-11 7.0 years ago

    If you read the description it explains why @LiamW

  • DMRI “Phalanx” Mk IX 7.0 years ago

    I am half Greek-half English, so I make Greek and RAF aircraft sometimes, you noticed correctly! @Dimkal

  • Nuclear Powered Aircraft Carrier 7.0 years ago

    Looks great to me, just a few extra railings and some detailing and it’ll look great!

  • RDG “Hoplite” EB-11 7.0 years ago

    Ok, thanks for the advice. I’ll try it in the next build @CoolPeach

  • PD-23 7.0 years ago

    Great @MrDoolittle

  • PD-23 7.0 years ago

    Haha true, can’t argue with that! Sorry about all the stuff over the past few weeks that we’ve argued about and such... want to call it a truce and be cool with each other? @MrDoolittle

  • PD-23 7.0 years ago

    Hey, im not trying to insult you or anything. It’s boxy to accomodate a larger cargo area (and what about the Phalanx?), and I respect you as builder (you make good stuff when you try) but there’s no need to be rude about it @MrDoolittle

  • PD-23 7.0 years ago

    Yes, but you have fine tuner! I didn’t when I made my Spitz because that was in 1.6. Look at my new creations (DMRI “Evia” and forward) for what I can make when I have fine tuner and try to beat one of those. It’s a nice planes though, good job. @MrDoolittle

  • PD-23 7.0 years ago

    Yes? Why did you tag me? @MrDoolittle

  • This could be helpful... 7.0 years ago

    Simple yet VERY helpful

  • Chitty Chitty Bang Bang! 7.0 years ago

    Beautiful!

  • Teaser 7.0 years ago

    Looks really good

  • A very exciting announcment. 7.0 years ago

    Thanks! On the road to gold! @Lylian

  • A very exciting announcment. 7.0 years ago

    No I don’t think you’re crazy, I think aspiring is a great thing to do! @Lylian

  • WW2 Challenge H-111 not mk 2 7.0 years ago

    Ok, it’s fuselage is of similar scale.... obviously that is because the prop in game is a 2x2 and there’s a very small amount of width and height configurations which would look good if combined with it. Stop trying to bring my planes down, and come back when you make better creations than me. THEN you can insult me @MrDoolittle

  • Maximum Battleship Lenin 7.0 years ago

    Well it works on my iPad Air 2, and that’s much less powerful than the pro @RandomDude

  • RDG “Hoplite” EB-11 7.0 years ago

    @Lylian ok thanks!

  • Destroyer - for the 1.7 update 7.0 years ago

    Really good job on this one!

  • RDG “Hoplite” EB-11 7.0 years ago

    @Lylian @BusterShortWolf thanks! I put a lot of effort into it!

  • RDG “Hoplite” EB-11 7.0 years ago

    Thanks! I can make a mobile friendly version if you want? I’ll have it ready in about 10 hours @4404

  • Solaris Serenity 7.0 years ago

    Yeah, nice job by the way! @Solarisaircraft

  • Solaris Serenity 7.0 years ago

    The interior was made by someone else @tsampoy

  • Data reserve 2 7.0 years ago

    No problem! @pushthelimits

  • (Closed) Simple Planes XML.com - Free XML piece ordering (Read Description) 7.0 years ago

    So to get that amount of thrust you reduced the amount of power from the normal BF300 (60,000lb thrust) and divide it by 8 (7,500lb) @Lylian

  • (Closed) Simple Planes XML.com - Free XML piece ordering (Read Description) 7.0 years ago

    You know when you select engines and it shows you the amount of thrust it has? I mean to reduce the power of it to that amount of power. @Lylian

  • (Closed) Simple Planes XML.com - Free XML piece ordering (Read Description) 7.0 years ago

    Can I please order
    - A cleaver missile that weighs 150 pounds and goes 1.4x faster
    - a BF300 that is very small (about half the size of a J15) and produces 7,200lbs of thrust

    Thanks!

  • Flat earth 7.0 years ago

    Incorrect

  • (Closed) Simple Planes XML.com - Free XML piece ordering (Read Description) 7.0 years ago

    Can I please order a gryoscope with

    Speed - 400%
    Stability - 700%
    Pitch - 7°
    Roll - 4°
    Yaw power - 3,500%

    As you may have gathered I need a VERY powerful gyroscope to handle my upcoming creation!

    Also, can I please order a cleaver missile that weighs 150 pounds? Thanks!

  • Rock crusher v2.0 7.0 years ago

    It’s ok; you didn’t know the rules, but now that you do just don’t do it again. All good? @Stormtrooper61

  • bouncy cube 7.0 years ago

    I don’t think your mobile device is very powerful... it can run on my iPad Air 2 on max graphics at 60+ FPS and my iPad was released in 2014

  • Truck Challenge! 7.0 years ago

    Then how is a winner determined? @Slade195

  • Data reserve 2 7.0 years ago

    If you want to make data reserves then I recommend uploading them as unlisted posts.. then you are the only one who can see it

  • B-17G on the horizon... (Teaser) 7.0 years ago

    Great! @CoolPeach

  • B-17G on the horizon... (Teaser) 7.0 years ago

    I have an iPad Air 2 and can run builds with 800 parts before the frame rate starts to go down @temporaryaccount

  • DMRI “Phalanx” Mk IX 7.0 years ago

    It was just designed from start just as a VTOL aircraft, I wasn’t really thinking about helicopters... @PhantomBladeCorp

  • DMRI “Phalanx” Mk IX 7.0 years ago

    Haha yeah... thanks for the upvote! But what do you mean by ‘I guess?’ @PhantomBladeCorp

  • DMRI “Phalanx” Mk IX 7.0 years ago

    Thanks! @Ihavenorealideawhatiamdoing

  • WW2 Challenge H-111 not mk 2 7.0 years ago

    Um... if you are saying that I simply ‘modified the base plane slightly’ then you are completely and utterly wrong, not the first time! I got rid of everything when I downloaded the challenge, and then began to build. My aircraft looks nothing like the base plane, and has completely different performance (I think you need your eyes checked) @MrDoolittle

  • WW2 Challenge H-111 not 7.0 years ago

    Oh yeah, I sort of forgot about it and then stumbled on your profile again, found your unreplied message and decided to sort of clarify what I was saying @MrDoolittle