1,362 ShrimpRex Comments

  • F/A 129 "Storm" (Cold War Challenge Entry) 3.8 years ago

    @LieutenantSOT Thank you! Looking forward to the final verdict

  • Cold War Aircraft Fighters Challenge [CLOSED] 3.8 years ago

    @LieutenantSOT All righty then I finally got around to fixing the whole successor thing, hope it's not too late for the entry. It's part of the Naval Fighter/Interceptor group btw. Cheers!

  • F/A-129 "Storm" 3.8 years ago

    @ImaCat Thanks!

  • Cold War Aircraft Fighters Challenge [CLOSED] 3.8 years ago

    @LieutenantSOT I really appreciate it, I'm very proud of it and making it for a challenge was very fun

  • Cold War Aircraft Fighters Challenge [CLOSED] 3.8 years ago

    @ShrimpRex @LieutenantSOT I know you said that you would make no exceptions on the successor rule but can you make a teeny tiny exception for me...?
    HEAR ME OUT:
    I uploaded the plane as a successor but then found I had forgot a vital part so I removed it and reuploaded it but then it had lost the listing as a successor... Your successor list even says that there is one more than on the actual successor page.
    Could you please help me out here? Pretty please with a cherry on top?

    https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/4kdt0r/F-A-129-Storm

  • Cold War Aircraft Fighters Challenge [CLOSED] 3.8 years ago

    @LieutenantSOT I just submitted mine for scenario 3, it's the F/A-129 "Storm"

  • Cold War Aircraft Fighters Challenge [CLOSED] 3.9 years ago

    Yeah, I'll join in. I'll do Scenario 3. How does this work?

  • North American T-38 Talon (NASA) 5.7 years ago

    @BlackhattAircraft Really it's not a problem. I always appreciate feedback :)

  • North American T-38 Talon (NASA) 5.7 years ago

    @BlackhattAircraft I appreciate the input although I disagree by the contents of said input. As a friendly reminder at the bottom of a post I don't see it as a problem or something I need to change due to rules and regulations. Keep up your good work and I wish you all the best in your future endeavours.

  • North American T-38 Talon (NASA) 5.7 years ago

    @BlackhattAircraft again, not begging

  • MiG-28 5.7 years ago

    @BlackhattAircraft but I do appreciate the notice

  • MiG-28 5.7 years ago

    @BlackhattAircraft Nah man, the rules say you should not ‘beg’ for upvotes. I only said that you could if you wanted to

  • MiG-28 5.7 years ago

    @BlackhattAircraft Indeed, my good sir

  • Cloud Shark Zero 5.7 years ago

    @Apehorse19 been working to make it lighter to fix those so yeah

  • Cloud Shark Zero 5.7 years ago

    @Treadmill103 @Windwaker5000 Thank you both, I will take that into consideration. I was actually planning on making the wings super thin and just cover them with fuselage to make it look like a proper wing with profile and all. Only problem are the leading edge ailerons but I'll try

  • Cloud Shark Zero 5.7 years ago

    Hey @Treadmill103, @FishMiner and @Windwaker5000 don't mean to bother you but do you have any feedback regarding the plane? As stated in the description I want to make revisions of the aircraft based on community suggestions

  • Cloud Shark Zero 5.7 years ago

    @Apehorse19 Well since you’re here, would you like to suggest some form of change? How can I make this plane better? Better styling or handling characteristics?

  • Cloud Shark Zero 5.7 years ago

    @Apehorse19 Well it's really a mix of many different planes. The idea of a belly mounted jet came from the Yak-15, the side intakes derived from the F-104 Starfighter and the overall sharky nature from the Aero Shark Light Sport

  • Maddog 5.7 years ago

    More like hotdog eyyyyyyy GOTEM

  • help 5.7 years ago

    @Minnererg Or by pressing space

  • Curtiss-Wright P2 Warhawk noob 5.7 years ago

    Looks oddly familiar

    +1
  • NUNs Aircraft Challenge(Closed/Ended) 5.7 years ago

    What on earth..? like... what

  • General Aviation Challenge [CLOSED] 5.8 years ago

    @EternalDarkness That’s one way to put it, I guess

  • General Aviation Challenge [CLOSED] 5.8 years ago

    @EternalDarkness I have an aircraft with 90 parts, is that acceptable or do I need to add useless bits to it?

  • Boeing Microfighter 5.8 years ago

    @atgxtg Nice, the landing gear was just for testing purposes, but I hid it away in the fuselage so it wasn't visible in flight so I just left it. You can call it creative freedom xD

  • Boeing Microfighter 5.8 years ago

    @Falkenwut Thanks! I'm not very consistant, but I will try my best ;)

    +1
  • Boeing Microfighter 5.8 years ago

    @atgxtg Yeah sure go ahead just make sure to credit me in the end :)

  • Boeing Microfighter 5.8 years ago

    By the way, you should all watch Mustard's mini documentary on the 747 aircraft carrier on youtube!

    +2
  • AFC Vulture V.I (Challenge Entry) 7.8 years ago

    Love it <3
    Probably one of (if not the) best handling planes i've ever flown! Teach me your secrets

  • Lots of Great Posts by "Lower Ranked" Players! 7.9 years ago

    Thanks a lot for doing this! We lower level players really appreciate it!

  • Il Aerotempo Gigante 7.9 years ago

    Yeah, I had to mess around with the XML files a bit, but it worked! I used your little mini gadget propeller thingy (can't remember what it was called originally) on the back to propel the whole thing! Thank's for the awesome original design, @zap210 !

  • Volkswagen Sky Golf Mk.1 8.1 years ago

    Thanks, @komuhachi for building the car! At some point, SP dun goofed and therefore it's not listed as an edit of your car. I apologise this, because your Golf is the predecessor of the Sky Golf.

    Flies away

  • F-104 Starfighter 8.5 years ago

    It's a little unstable and has some problems getting up to speed, but the design is amazing!

  • Performance Glider 8.5 years ago

    ...
    Thank you @ValtsuAircraftIndustries

  • Performance Glider 8.5 years ago

    Also, I forgot to mention this in the description; Taking off the winglets is also a good option to get a little better performance

  • F-104 Starfighter 8.5 years ago

    Good job there

  • P-38 Lightning 8.6 years ago

    @ThePotato No problem at all! Just keep making awesome things!

  • P-38 Lightning 8.6 years ago

    Nice job decking this thing out!
    Good guy @ThePotato!

  • P-38 Lightning 8.6 years ago

    Thank you for the 90% credits @ThePotato ;) I really do appreciate it! BTW great looking plane you've got there!

  • Shark Tooth 8.8 years ago

    @MediocrePlanes ok, that's a bummer

  • Shark Tooth 8.8 years ago

    @AndrewGarrison Are VTOL nozzles allowed? For turning and such

  • Curtiss P-40 "Kittyhawk" 8.9 years ago

    @Theflyingauzzie Here it is in all it's glory :)

  • RAAF second versio 8.9 years ago

    @Theflyingauzzie I just have to put on the last USAF tags and then it'll be out for everyone to (hopefully) enjoy

  • RAAF second versio 8.9 years ago

    @Theflyingauzzie By the way, I haven't had the chance to tell you since we're in two completely different time-zones, but the kittyhawk is as good as done! Though I couldn't find a singe RAAF symbol so sadly it's USAF property instead. I did my best

  • RAAF second versio 8.9 years ago

    @Theflyingauzzie I've been looking at some of your designs and yeah, I can believe it! Though you need to work on your symbol making skills ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

  • Lockheed P-38 Lightning 8.9 years ago

    @DeezDucks Thanks

  • Lockheed P-38 Lightning 8.9 years ago

    @DeezDucks Oh, okay. I have tried to take from others too, but... well, long story short, I don't know why it doesn't work

  • Lockheed P-38 Lightning 8.9 years ago

    @DeezDucks Hey, I was just wondering about something. What mod do you use to make those symbols and emblems on planes? Whenever I try to make a symbol or something it becomes way too thick and just sticks out awkwardly from the craft

  • RAAF second versio 8.9 years ago

    @Theflyingauzzie better than nothing :) night

  • RAAF symbol 8.9 years ago

    @Theflyingauzzie Nice, where is it?