I don't know if this will work for your specific situation, but I've fixed some problems like this before. I had to make sure that the first thing attached to the rotator was a very short segment of structural wing. It seems that the connection strength depends on the part attached, rather than the rotator itself.
I can't recommend the mod that Latent posted enough. I did xml-edit rotations all the time, but even then the mod still made it a lot quicker and easier.
It's cool, it's not unusual for newer people to get frustrated about the lack of attention. After all, it had to happen quite a lot for the community to turn against it in the first place. I'll take a look at some of your planes and see if I can offer any advice. Otherwise, contests and tournaments can be a pretty good way of getting people to notice you, as well as helping with requests on the forums if you're able to
@PlanesOfOld because he hasn't done anything to justify taking action against here. Would you expect me to ban people for what they've said on reddit, or YouTube? On this site, the one where I am meant to be keeping an eye on things, you and your supporters are the ones making the attacks.
Please do not upload things that you didn't make. Continuing to do so will result in a ban. Editing planes is fine, but you must make substantial changes and improvements to justify uploading it.
The site's servers have issues sometimes. The only thing you can really do is wait a bit and see if it works later. If it's still broken tomorrow, contact the devs.
@PlanesOfOld look, I know that that is clearly mockery and harassment, but I don't know how many times you want me to say it: I cannot do anything about what happens on Everyplay. At all.
@Warbrine there's no actual requirement to credit the original builder in the description, that's what the predecessor bit is for. The only times that I edit them are when people wrongly claim to have built things themselves
Please do not upload things that you didn't make. Continuing to do so will result in a ban. Editing planes is fine, but you must make substantial changes and improvements to justify uploading it.
To be fair, longswords weren't meant to fight plate armour either, swords are kinda bad at that in general. You need something much stronger and heavier to get through armour. Surely the ballistic gel one is a pretty fair test, though? Both swords were intended for humans, in the end.
European swords kinda had a huge advantage, though, simply because Europe had better natural resources of iron.
@TehJetMan well spotted, thanks. I should add that it's generally best to comment on one of the mods' old planes rather than making a public forum post, though.
@HAWAII808 he has been in trouble before for it, as has TheOldColonel, because they are both at fault. However, most of their arguing happens on Everyplay, which is nothing to with us.
As for flame wars always happening: yes, they will. That's why we'll always be there to tidy them up too.
I think the comparison between the longsword and katana specifically is made because they were each the pinnacle of that culture's swordmaking. European knights didn't usually use swords against each other because things like hammers were better against the nigh-impenetrable armour they had, but hammer vs katana is a less interesting comparison. Trying to compare weaponry from the same time period winds up with guns against swords.
@Thefalloutplayr it's fine, I never said you couldn't join in with discussions, I just didn't want people restarting that particular one.
Reducing the buoyancy at the back is usually helpful
I don't know if this will work for your specific situation, but I've fixed some problems like this before. I had to make sure that the first thing attached to the rotator was a very short segment of structural wing. It seems that the connection strength depends on the part attached, rather than the rotator itself.
Definitely possible, it's just a question of who finds the patience first
@bonehead what's the problem here?
Please don't name planes after YouTubers, this is considered spam.
@ShatteredAviation it no longer says that he did it himself, so I don't see a problem. The predecessor link is there
I can't recommend the mod that Latent posted enough. I did xml-edit rotations all the time, but even then the mod still made it a lot quicker and easier.
It's cool, it's not unusual for newer people to get frustrated about the lack of attention. After all, it had to happen quite a lot for the community to turn against it in the first place. I'll take a look at some of your planes and see if I can offer any advice. Otherwise, contests and tournaments can be a pretty good way of getting people to notice you, as well as helping with requests on the forums if you're able to
@PlanesOfOld it is taken seriously, but it's like you've been mugged in the UK and then asked the French police to do something about it.
@PlanesOfOld because he hasn't done anything to justify taking action against here. Would you expect me to ban people for what they've said on reddit, or YouTube? On this site, the one where I am meant to be keeping an eye on things, you and your supporters are the ones making the attacks.
Please do not upload things that you didn't make. Continuing to do so will result in a ban. Editing planes is fine, but you must make substantial changes and improvements to justify uploading it.
The site's servers have issues sometimes. The only thing you can really do is wait a bit and see if it works later. If it's still broken tomorrow, contact the devs.
@PlanesOfOld look, I know that that is clearly mockery and harassment, but I don't know how many times you want me to say it: I cannot do anything about what happens on Everyplay. At all.
@Arcues mind the language please
@General360 see rule 1 please
@Luke92778 not really, although it seems that you can definitely mention three people and have it work properly.
@Warbrine they presumably deleted their upvoted planes
@NumNumz have you tried today's update? The bouncing got a lot more manageable
@DarkAssassin your comments have been removed, off-topic self promotion is just spam
@KingDeadshot that one is more a guideline than a rule. Basically, it just says don't spam
@KingDeadshot Glaceon scored a ban earlier anyway, but yes, Rocket requested that people embed images less
@GINGER01 of course! Just remind me when you have it
Okay so I got it working properly, but then I realised... I'm on the beta version. I don't know if you can use it until the beta comes to mobile
@Gdc2001 hate is hate regardless of who it's coming from or who it's aimed at. Report anything that deserves it
@Warbrine there's no actual requirement to credit the original builder in the description, that's what the predecessor bit is for. The only times that I edit them are when people wrongly claim to have built things themselves
@SimpleTechAndResearch it's the default Unity response to not finding a texture, I think it's so that it's easily spotted for developers to fix
@SimpleTechAndResearch oh, all the trails are made of big bright pink squares instead of smoke particles
@SimpleTechAndResearch I'm not sure I understand; you want to know what it looked like before the textures went missing?
@SimpleTechAndResearch nah, they moved to a new version of Unity which caused a few issues.
Done
@SimpleTechAndResearch I do plan on fixing it soon! I just have a few other things to do first
@PINK yeah, exactly. Have you seen the mordhau technique? It's interesting to see the adaptions people came up with to deal with armour
Please do not upload things that you didn't make. Continuing to do so will result in a ban. Editing planes is fine, but you must make substantial changes and improvements to justify uploading it.
To be fair, longswords weren't meant to fight plate armour either, swords are kinda bad at that in general. You need something much stronger and heavier to get through armour. Surely the ballistic gel one is a pretty fair test, though? Both swords were intended for humans, in the end.
European swords kinda had a huge advantage, though, simply because Europe had better natural resources of iron.
@DeezDucks I think getting banned in under five minutes might be a record.
I'm removing this now, since it's over with. No need for more drama
@QUOTEGOD nooice
@VoloEsseNudusCumTuusMater ban it is, then. You had your chance.
@VoloEsseNudusCumTuusMater because your name is breaking literally the first rule of the website. It doesn't matter if it's not in English.
@TehJetMan well spotted, thanks. I should add that it's generally best to comment on one of the mods' old planes rather than making a public forum post, though.
@VoloEsseNudusCumTuusMater okay, yeah, that's definitely not on. Volo, you can either change your name sharpish or I can ban your account, your call.
@HAWAII808 download this, it's an HTML file with links to all of your recent unlisted planes. I'll delete it once you have it.
@Thetank2 it did when it was posted. Volo changed it when I asked, so I made the post visible again.
@HAWAII808 he has been in trouble before for it, as has TheOldColonel, because they are both at fault. However, most of their arguing happens on Everyplay, which is nothing to with us.
As for flame wars always happening: yes, they will. That's why we'll always be there to tidy them up too.
I think the comparison between the longsword and katana specifically is made because they were each the pinnacle of that culture's swordmaking. European knights didn't usually use swords against each other because things like hammers were better against the nigh-impenetrable armour they had, but hammer vs katana is a less interesting comparison. Trying to compare weaponry from the same time period winds up with guns against swords.
@HAWAII808 yes.
@VoloEsseNudusCumTuusMater thank you! It's back up now
@HAWAII808 so what, mods should ignore them because they'll always happen? That's not what we're here for.
@HAWAII808 PlanesOfOld is not off the hook, but he wasn't the one that restarted it several days after it had ended.