The flight model could indeed use some work, but the shape, and especially cockpit, are a very good start. BTW, the plane keeps banking left when I pitch, and it is most likely because of some mirroring issue. If so, you could invert the control surfaces, which would solve the problem. @SPairforce
Most modern mobile devices, at least from my experience, are able to run well in excess of 1000 parts without problem. Pretty much everything I own made after 2015 is capable of that, and my 2nd generation iPad Pro is able to run close to every build on this site up to 6000 or so parts. The bar for mobile devices is far higher than it used to be, so the rationale for 1000 part or so builds is perfectly valid.
@F104Deathtrap The thing is this game has progressed to a point where you have to be ridiculously good to get any upvotes at all, and it is kind of annoying for me, and i'm sure too for many others. I also commonly notice that my planes get not much more downloads than upvotes, and both quantities are pretty low.
It appears that the KC-135 was indeed a KC-135. If you look at underbody pictures, it matches up. And there is no way that is an A340 or Il-96. The fake MAX was probably some NG.
no
US BB line split 🤮🤢
Is that first ship the Mainz from WoWs?
Impressive build and a great part count to match. Steering could use work, but this is an excellent start.
T
Can’t wait for the Dunkerque!
The flight model could indeed use some work, but the shape, and especially cockpit, are a very good start. BTW, the plane keeps banking left when I pitch, and it is most likely because of some mirroring issue. If so, you could invert the control surfaces, which would solve the problem. @SPairforce
Kawasaki C-2 by RandomUsername
https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/LPT7Ex/Kawasaki-C-2-by-RandomUsername
Oh please be a Saab. (900 T16?)
The winglets really do improve it.
Best looking trijet you’ve made so far, and the FBW works well.
The ejection of the spent shell casings is a very nice touch.
Most modern mobile devices, at least from my experience, are able to run well in excess of 1000 parts without problem. Pretty much everything I own made after 2015 is capable of that, and my 2nd generation iPad Pro is able to run close to every build on this site up to 6000 or so parts. The bar for mobile devices is far higher than it used to be, so the rationale for 1000 part or so builds is perfectly valid.
I like this series of turrets, would be great to see more.
Definitely ships, especially battlecruisers.
Looks kind of like a Braunschweig-class
Looks like Amagi but sort of French or American? Perhaps name it Aquitaine.
3 Body Problem?
Save name LMAO
Not wrong though.
HE spam detected
Happy April Fools everyone!
Wow, these look great. Would love to see Kii in the future.
Wow, you’re back! I remember when you had the only functional gauge clusters on the site.
Interesting control surface arrangement.
It would be cool if you could make the Japan Air System 777 with the rainbow livery.
Yep, finally back with a racer. Albeit one that’s prone to crashing itself and sometimes the game. @SemedianIndustries
The accuracy is astounding.
https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/QL889l/General-Aviation-Prototype-02
And
https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/bwAXbH/Solaris-Sable-Advanced
yeah im not submitting my terrible plane anymore
also TTTTTTTTT
kurwa!
Could you try to make an Airbus A300-600R?
This thing literally has the power of a ram air turbine.
T
@F104Deathtrap The thing is this game has progressed to a point where you have to be ridiculously good to get any upvotes at all, and it is kind of annoying for me, and i'm sure too for many others. I also commonly notice that my planes get not much more downloads than upvotes, and both quantities are pretty low.
Its just now you have to be so much better to be able to get any upvotes at all so most new users just don't make planes anymore.
Icebreaker?
This is probably your 5th ship with that part count. Also, amazing "boat"
I see. His most recent posts had been just weeks, even days ago, so I am not sure. But it's sad to see him leave.@QingyuZhou
a great zuccsess
I still have an older higher part count version of this with a cockpit interior. Also a Saieqa.
MU=best
Oui.
Put me in@GritAerospaceSolutionsLTD Attempt #4
Can you please add me?
Attempt #3
Include me, please.
Me
Great perspective! try to use a thinner pencil, maybe even H for the lines. and heavier shading. It is beautiful
It appears that the KC-135 was indeed a KC-135. If you look at underbody pictures, it matches up. And there is no way that is an A340 or Il-96. The fake MAX was probably some NG.
b u s h
Impressively sleek, at no cost to part count.