@Stanmich Not to say that it won't get mods, but JNO is already modded, and is already understood. KSP2 is an unproven modding scape, while JNO is a modding utopia.
@Dragoranos The BASE scope of JNO is lesser than KSP2, but JNO is ripe for updating, modding, and improvement that I'm not so sure KSP2 is so good for.
Ok but 500pts minimum!? I understand that this is a regular part count prior to maybe 1.11, but I mean the fuselage I've been working and tuning to the blueprints is 38 parts, which I've not added wings, surfaces, or cockpit but I do feel like I cannot recoup that with that simply you feel?
Pushing the COL back makes it easier to enter dives, and loses some pitch authority for the aircraft, causing lesser AoA capability. While COL doesn't, indeed, affect speed directly, it does indirectly.
@Zaineman I tried to find a balance between realism and efficiency. the centre of mass is closer to the centre of lift to give greater manueverability in flight. Not only that, but I gave the wing a flat bottom, as flat bottom wings stall at significantly higher aoas. If I were to change one thing, it'd probably be the flight dynamics. the wing loading could use some work.
That's a fine build
Simpleng.drive
+1T
If stonehenge from ace combat was built in the 1940s
+3idk
3
what is the maximum speed taken from? a dive, or level flight?
Can we use cannons for realisms sake as guns?
+1can I use the T1000 instead of T3000? the 3000 is unruly because of its odd shape
+1T
Nooice
+2Congrats on 100K!
testicle
Brings a whole new meaning to tilted towers
+5why is the tip of the nerf dart glowing orange?
Pls make the electronic warfare anti theft bike
+2YOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
looks like the gull-winged A5M prototype
@JesusChrist "I asked for apple juice"
@TheTomatoLover You know what, since I found the fandom page for it that has its blueprints why not
+1T
+1Reminds me of the F7U Cutlass.
TTTTTTTTTTTTTT
reminds me of the Glasair kitbuilt Glastar
@Stanmich Not to say that it won't get mods, but JNO is already modded, and is already understood. KSP2 is an unproven modding scape, while JNO is a modding utopia.
@Dragoranos The BASE scope of JNO is lesser than KSP2, but JNO is ripe for updating, modding, and improvement that I'm not so sure KSP2 is so good for.
T
@KnightOfAraluen YOU WOULDN'T DOWNLOAD A CAR
+3N64 moment
Nice build! I'd add the 'Dieselpunk' tag. it fits.
+1@Angelcod73 Yes because that counts as modification
+1Ok but 500pts minimum!? I understand that this is a regular part count prior to maybe 1.11, but I mean the fuselage I've been working and tuning to the blueprints is 38 parts, which I've not added wings, surfaces, or cockpit but I do feel like I cannot recoup that with that simply you feel?
+1@THEEND8238927373627
Light Speed Planes Do Not Exist
Otherwise yes
I'm making an XP-67
why did you make this
Emmanuel means "god is among us"
+1Dieselpunk vibes
+2T
+2T for Trongus
Pushing the COL back makes it easier to enter dives, and loses some pitch authority for the aircraft, causing lesser AoA capability. While COL doesn't, indeed, affect speed directly, it does indirectly.
+1@Kangy good idea
YIPPEEEEEE
+1@jamesPLANESii It felt fitting
@Zaineman I tried to find a balance between realism and efficiency. the centre of mass is closer to the centre of lift to give greater manueverability in flight. Not only that, but I gave the wing a flat bottom, as flat bottom wings stall at significantly higher aoas. If I were to change one thing, it'd probably be the flight dynamics. the wing loading could use some work.
+1@Zaineman sweet
@Scrabble5555 No, Bell X-1, the first supersonic aircraft. You may be confused, as both were air launched high velocity vehicles.
also I wanna ask, is it ok if I modify the inputs of the throttle with overload (it won't change the max thrust)
I'm making an X-1
@Wallaby RC flyer (lightweight, various)
I've been routinely hitting 1350ktas in this thing (>Mach 2) and it hits 30km in altitude so Idk if you should count it
My plane's ready I've got it tuned up