@AndrewGarrison also (and I know it probably won't happen by beta release or even full launch) but the procedural turbine engine from Juno would be awesome. To elivate that, make a procedural piston engine, and have both be able to link to wheels or propellers either directly (in the piston engines case) or via a gear box
@AndrewGarrison why not make Chad a customizable blank customizable charecter with attachment points all over it for different parts, like for clothing pieces, armor or any parts available in the designer to serve as such?
@Graingy they were considered low effort. And because back then there was an unlimited daily upload limit, you could pump them out every our, essentially spamming the site.
Definitely Antonwings. Posts part efficient, well above par replicas and doesn't get wrapped up in drama.
Catbaron and MrSilverwolf. Both of theses two put effort into making there builds detailed, and and flight accurate. They also take advantage of funkytrees to ensure flight sim (or better) realism with things like engine startup and propeller management.
They test spy planes at Edwards. Groom Lake is where our foreign aircraft evaluation and adversary squadrons are based. We have a squadron that uses mig 29s and su-30s that flies down to the Nelis test range for Red Flag.
Infact all the good stuff is nowhere near area 51.
Seriously? A joke challenge and you don't want white Rankers to join? I take offense to this because when I first started, joining challenges are how I got atarted.started.
We're all entitled to our opinion, however you should be ashamed of yours.
I feel like February is an active year for people to go on vacation, and do other things with family or make money / life moves. I would not be surprised if this is just due to life happening we are all after all, human.
@Mousewithamachinegun122 He wasn't the guy running the show. It was a moderator on that discord, who has been Ostriched by the community since then. In fact I believe he was also banned as well, after his antics on that discord, but the damage has been done. by the way, if it helps, it was Simpleplanes Builders Chat.
As far as we know, no. Andrew has only supposedly mentioned this on one discord, only after 75% of its members were permabanned for no reason. An as far as I am concerned, anything that happens on that discord should be considered false until proven true.
@PrussianAirlines So it's inspired by "Miss Ashley II", which was a P-51 fuselage mated to a Learjet 23 flight surfaces, but retained the P-51s vertical tail, albeit coming off an H model. This caused the tail to fail at pylon 1 of the reno race course in 1997, causing the plane to break apart. I hypothesize that had someone used an F-86s wings and tail including the vertical stab, it'd make a fast and sturdy race plane.
@KSB24 if you could make this to where i can take this and put it in any plane that'd be awesome
+2I want them all
+1Lots of rotators and grippy spheres
You're still running Windows 8!?
+1T
Now THIS is a kicking fish!
Mad Propz was based on the Seafire
I agree but it's not the end of the world if they don't. it's not simple cars after all
Ok but so does the internet
@AndrewGarrison also (and I know it probably won't happen by beta release or even full launch) but the procedural turbine engine from Juno would be awesome. To elivate that, make a procedural piston engine, and have both be able to link to wheels or propellers either directly (in the piston engines case) or via a gear box
@AndrewGarrison why not make Chad a customizable blank customizable charecter with attachment points all over it for different parts, like for clothing pieces, armor or any parts available in the designer to serve as such?
It's Gonna Be May!
+1-Nsync
@@AndrewGarrison you should start a Discord server like Flyout has.
Have you ever considered replicating the AC6 Idolmasters DLC aircraft?
+1You're GOD DAMN RiGHT!!!!!!!!!!
@Graingy they were considered low effort. And because back then there was an unlimited daily upload limit, you could pump them out every our, essentially spamming the site.
+1I remember when posting PEAs got you reprimanded.
+1@Nerfaddict that's insane
Yep
+1I'm seeing unsilisted adds for Adem and Eve as well. For reference my tailored adds should be rc planes and math websites.
+1There's literally a B model mustang you could of based this off of in game.
Before you ask, the difference between the B and C models was just where the planes were manufactured.
This plane will be removed by EOD. incase you haven't figured it out, April Fools!!!
+1@RandomFurryBattlebotsFan
@Dogedogebread13
@SomeSPGuyWhoLikesLore
@Mousewithamachinegun122
+1@DatTrainAndCarGuy19
@Majakalona
this is a Boxer AFV
@Boeing727200Fwithapistol I hope you don't mind I changed the cockpit to support vr
This is one way to do it
Cool
Definitely Antonwings. Posts part efficient, well above par replicas and doesn't get wrapped up in drama.
+6Catbaron and MrSilverwolf. Both of theses two put effort into making there builds detailed, and and flight accurate. They also take advantage of funkytrees to ensure flight sim (or better) realism with things like engine startup and propeller management.
@Chubster honestly leave it alone. Karts Re super easy to oversteer and it could get frustrating.
Part efficient, 1:1 scale and looks good! and, drives great although a bit to easy
why didn't you modernize the build? surely with the parts at your disposal, you can add new gauges and windows!
They test spy planes at Edwards. Groom Lake is where our foreign aircraft evaluation and adversary squadrons are based. We have a squadron that uses mig 29s and su-30s that flies down to the Nelis test range for Red Flag.
Infact all the good stuff is nowhere near area 51.
I don't normally upvote successors but this is different. If i may suggest, utilize the label part to complete the livery.
are you talking about the Simplelandia war of 2019? that was a kinda world role play that failed because it got out of hand due to a few reasons.
+1@RepublicOfCursedPlanes find something better to do with your time.
+5Seriously? A joke challenge and you don't want white Rankers to join? I take offense to this because when I first started, joining challenges are how I got atarted.started.
We're all entitled to our opinion, however you should be ashamed of yours.
+9@LunarEclipseSP I don't have Fandom account but I do have every stock aircraft from 1.0 to current as well as who made it and what it was based on.
+1I feel like February is an active year for people to go on vacation, and do other things with family or make money / life moves. I would not be surprised if this is just due to life happening we are all after all, human.
That's not how it works
Sounds like it needs an alignment
@Mousewithamachinegun122 He wasn't the guy running the show. It was a moderator on that discord, who has been Ostriched by the community since then. In fact I believe he was also banned as well, after his antics on that discord, but the damage has been done. by the way, if it helps, it was Simpleplanes Builders Chat.
+1As far as we know, no. Andrew has only supposedly mentioned this on one discord, only after 75% of its members were permabanned for no reason. An as far as I am concerned, anything that happens on that discord should be considered false until proven true.
+1Print one of your Simpleplanes builds
How is this a Focker Dr.1?
@PrussianAirlines So it's inspired by "Miss Ashley II", which was a P-51 fuselage mated to a Learjet 23 flight surfaces, but retained the P-51s vertical tail, albeit coming off an H model. This caused the tail to fail at pylon 1 of the reno race course in 1997, causing the plane to break apart. I hypothesize that had someone used an F-86s wings and tail including the vertical stab, it'd make a fast and sturdy race plane.
"No, we do not serve Mac and cheese! That's Mandarin Oranges!"
Kachow
Someone's not happy about dynamic pricing
+3This seriously needs to be pinned