Solar panels are very inefficient as of today's technology. It hasn't been above infancy for a while now. So, I don't think it's that good for the environment. What is good though, is using anything apart from just solar power. You could check out this video if you wanna really confirm that solar panels are inefficient.
Love it.
big intek
I agree with the comment below.
This is way better than my MiG-21. Good job.
@FalcoOne By no special modding, he means no Funky Trees or mods. If you can do what you just said by XML modding only, why not?
Canard planes existed back in WWII? Wack.
@PssyalperdnaEgg Thank you! I had a dilemma trying to conserve parts while also making it look like the real thing.
My build is out. Certainly not jam-packed with features.
Actually, never mind. I'm in trouble scrambling for F-4 blueprints, and I just resorted to making a MiG-15.
I'm planning to do an F-4 Phantom and I wanna try my hand out at some more building
hey, can there be more than one submission?
Ight cool
At first I was confused by the nacelle, then I realized this is actually the F-13 variant.
Also, it can be anything right?
No fuselage blocks?
@SheriffHackdogMCPE It'd be called the Ukrainian revolution then, and instead of Russia it's the Soviets.
I am aware that I got the horizontal stabilizers wrong. Too much parts to fit in one rotator.
Pretty nice. Reminds me of a MiG-21 with the horizontal stabilisers cut off.
My build is also out.
@WinsWings Okay, thanks. I'll just ready the post them I'm good to go.
Is exactly 25 parts okay?
Just below 3k performance cost. Runs good, still a little mobile friendly for me.
This shouldn't look like it has a LOT of parts in first sight, except it actually does. I wish I could try it out and say it's a good build.
@AEGIS I mean, the name alone gives away the fact that it IS Russian. Or Soviet.
life could be a dream
Having the balls to say the MiG-15's NATO reporting name is balls of steel. Or probably not.
Swept back wings too. Very cursed but I LOVE it.
How tf did you PSM with A GLIDER 💀💀💀💀💀💀💀
100 ways to kill an aircraft carrier when?
Hey can I uh modify the loadout a little and upload it?
I had a little bit of a pickle trying to control it, but good heli nonetheless.
SimplePlanes. The only time when 100Gs kills the pilot before the plane itself.
This performance cost is almost half of that 20,000 part Yamato. Amazing.
Imagine the electric motors swapped for a big honking V8.
Will you add this Schwalbe with unguided rockets?
21,000 performance cost.
@CarrotSlicingCompanyCat That sucks. Oh well.
trak
This is about as close as McLaren's actual livery this year. If only gulf sponsored them :(
今日もかわいい ! !
Don't know this guy, but he did comment on one of my uploads.
Classic story. Just like the Harrier.
Oh my god. This is so beautiful.
6000 performance cost. Holy shit.
please don't download it has 7 parts
@IceCraftGaming Quite a downgrade from the previous, though.
Sentient box decided to murder a convoy. 10/10 build quality, I'm keeping it as a pet.
I think this is completely satire. Has no one thought it's satire?
1PartsHUD on a twin prop? Now that's new.
Solar panels are very inefficient as of today's technology. It hasn't been above infancy for a while now. So, I don't think it's that good for the environment. What is good though, is using anything apart from just solar power.
+2You could check out this video if you wanna really confirm that solar panels are inefficient.
Love it.
+1big intek
I agree with the comment below.
+1This is way better than my MiG-21. Good job.
@FalcoOne By no special modding, he means no Funky Trees or mods. If you can do what you just said by XML modding only, why not?
Canard planes existed back in WWII? Wack.
+1@PssyalperdnaEgg Thank you! I had a dilemma trying to conserve parts while also making it look like the real thing.
My build is out. Certainly not jam-packed with features.
Actually, never mind. I'm in trouble scrambling for F-4 blueprints, and I just resorted to making a MiG-15.
+1I'm planning to do an F-4 Phantom and I wanna try my hand out at some more building
+1hey, can there be more than one submission?
+1Ight cool
At first I was confused by the nacelle, then I realized this is actually the F-13 variant.
+1Also, it can be anything right?
No fuselage blocks?
@SheriffHackdogMCPE It'd be called the Ukrainian revolution then, and instead of Russia it's the Soviets.
+1I am aware that I got the horizontal stabilizers wrong. Too much parts to fit in one rotator.
Pretty nice. Reminds me of a MiG-21 with the horizontal stabilisers cut off.
+4My build is also out.
+1@WinsWings Okay, thanks. I'll just ready the post them I'm good to go.
+1Is exactly 25 parts okay?
+1Just below 3k performance cost. Runs good, still a little mobile friendly for me.
+2This shouldn't look like it has a LOT of parts in first sight, except it actually does. I wish I could try it out and say it's a good build.
@AEGIS I mean, the name alone gives away the fact that it IS Russian. Or Soviet.
life could be a dream
+6Having the balls to say the MiG-15's NATO reporting name is balls of steel. Or probably not.
+4Swept back wings too. Very cursed but I LOVE it.
+1How tf did you PSM with A GLIDER 💀💀💀💀💀💀💀
+6100 ways to kill an aircraft carrier when?
+2Hey can I uh modify the loadout a little and upload it?
+1I had a little bit of a pickle trying to control it, but good heli nonetheless.
+2SimplePlanes. The only time when 100Gs kills the pilot before the plane itself.
+1This performance cost is almost half of that 20,000 part Yamato. Amazing.
+1Imagine the electric motors swapped for a big honking V8.
+1Will you add this Schwalbe with unguided rockets?
+221,000 performance cost.
JUST, wow.
+5@CarrotSlicingCompanyCat That sucks. Oh well.
+1trak
This is about as close as McLaren's actual livery this year. If only gulf sponsored them :(
今日もかわいい ! !
+2Don't know this guy, but he did comment on one of my uploads.
+1Classic story. Just like the Harrier.
+1Oh my god. This is so beautiful.
+16000 performance cost. Holy shit.
+1I'm a little bit skeptical
+1@IceCraftGaming Quite a downgrade from the previous, though.
Sentient box decided to murder a convoy. 10/10 build quality, I'm keeping it as a pet.
+3I think this is completely satire. Has no one thought it's satire?
1PartsHUD on a twin prop? Now that's new.
+1