The 90% of people assumption don't know where you got that number
.
Another opinion
.
I can guarantee the community will be better off without you. Sure,there may be an initial fuss, the usual generic "I'm leaving because I like to bully people" post. Yeah, people might miss you. But at the end of the day, with new users climbing the ranks, you'll be replaced and become nothing but a distant memory... Maybe we'll even remove your planes for you, just to give you a taste of your own medicine.
.
Another
.
Now to be blunt and honest, I don't care if you have loads of upvotes, but build small part count planes. Especially if you're being nice to the community. However, I do have a problem with people irrationally kicking up a fuss like a 5 year old because they think someone doesn't deserve something. That's toxic. I don't care if you build good planes or consider yourself a veteran in the community because at the end of the day breaking the site rules and abusing the system is a hell of a lot worse. I don't know about you, but I'd rather be surrounded by nice people and bad builds, that toxic people and good builds. So I'll openly say this now:
If you're one of those rule breakers and like to kick up drama. Leave. Leave the site.
.
Another
.
maybe you should give your ego and ignorance a once over check.
.
Another one
.
Those people that abuse the site know and actively let other users down know who they are. In fact, they openly admit that they push the boundaries of the rules, but only to the point where they believe they aren't breaking them. Which is ironic considering they are in fact breaking them.
.
Another
.
So apparently being in a state of denial is a common issue amongst some members of the community. Is it the downfall of the community? is this the end of the world as we know it? Is the whole site about to come crashing down on all those living below it?
The simple and concrete answer is... Sometimes/Maybe
.
I personally had to re-approve a users planes 5 times yesterday because some people thought they were above the site rules. Unfortunately for them, that comes under harassment, which can and from now on will lead to a temporary or permanent ban if caught in the act of reporting a plane from a particular user (I'm sure people know who that user is) which is well within the site rules.
.
Why don't they deserve them? Because they actively go on the newest section and upvote the good planes of new users on the site to give them more attention?
So first of all your making assumptions I did not persist the argument I did not need to show you your post because it right in front of your face to examine and clearly if I did show you it would be a waste of my time because you would not listen I was not the aggravator of this you were I am allowed to speak freely I simply gave you my opinion (not a angry one) and I told you I said everything I had to say but you kept going about things that weren't even part of the Initial conversation
This is what wiki says about that
.
.
In logic and philosophy, an argument is a series of statements typically used to persuade someone of something or to present reasons for accepting a conclusion.[1][2] The general form of an argument in a natural language is that of premises (typically in the form of propositions, statements or sentences) in support of a claim: the conclusion.[3][4][5] The structure of some arguments can also be set out in a formal language, and formally defined "arguments" can be made independently of natural language arguments, as in math, logic, and computer science.
Yes and that means being neutral and not arguing with users like me over something small moderators are expected atleast here to break up arguments and such not create them @Squirrel
This is the actual definition and yes it's basically is
.
.
Constructive criticism is the process of offering valid and well-reasoned opinions about the work of others, usually involving both positive and negative comments, in a friendly manner rather than an oppositional one. The purpose of 'constructive criticism is to improve the outcome.
Just look at the bottom of the site and press contact Jundroo
Comment everywhere and make good work
I know it's a joke
Is this for real?
I know your feeling of disappointment @ForzaFanlvl4
I managed to get the artillery shells to travel between the original islands and detonate this is amazing
3 platinums quit and some other banter
Ok thanks @AndrewGarrison
No he quit I think @Peridot
Manipulated new users and newbies to upvote his stuff however he did it so that he couldn't actually be banned @Peridot
Points don't matter what does matter is when someone steals your work and doesn't give credit @Sunnyskies
Unless they cheated that is like Salvador did @AviatorCleebo
420 graze it* @ACMECo1940
RIP
My original comment wasn't meant to have been offensive but rather something you could learn from
No you haven't brought anything to the table tell me that these are facts vs I have countered everything and gave you a list @Squirrel
Why have you handed it on to someone else? @Squirrel
They're based on concrete proof or some sort of proof
Facts aren't based on opinions XD
I showed you some of your opinions now I would like you to show me your facts
Ok what facts? @Squirrel
And you even admitted yourself that some of them were opinion based earlier
None of those are facts they are all opinion based
The 90% of people assumption don't know where you got that number
.
Another opinion
.
I can guarantee the community will be better off without you. Sure,there may be an initial fuss, the usual generic "I'm leaving because I like to bully people" post. Yeah, people might miss you. But at the end of the day, with new users climbing the ranks, you'll be replaced and become nothing but a distant memory... Maybe we'll even remove your planes for you, just to give you a taste of your own medicine.
.
Another
.
Now to be blunt and honest, I don't care if you have loads of upvotes, but build small part count planes. Especially if you're being nice to the community. However, I do have a problem with people irrationally kicking up a fuss like a 5 year old because they think someone doesn't deserve something. That's toxic. I don't care if you build good planes or consider yourself a veteran in the community because at the end of the day breaking the site rules and abusing the system is a hell of a lot worse. I don't know about you, but I'd rather be surrounded by nice people and bad builds, that toxic people and good builds. So I'll openly say this now:
If you're one of those rule breakers and like to kick up drama. Leave. Leave the site.
.
Another
.
maybe you should give your ego and ignorance a once over check.
.
Another one
.
Those people that abuse the site know and actively let other users down know who they are. In fact, they openly admit that they push the boundaries of the rules, but only to the point where they believe they aren't breaking them. Which is ironic considering they are in fact breaking them.
.
Another
.
So apparently being in a state of denial is a common issue amongst some members of the community. Is it the downfall of the community? is this the end of the world as we know it? Is the whole site about to come crashing down on all those living below it?
The simple and concrete answer is... Sometimes/Maybe
.
I personally had to re-approve a users planes 5 times yesterday because some people thought they were above the site rules. Unfortunately for them, that comes under harassment, which can and from now on will lead to a temporary or permanent ban if caught in the act of reporting a plane from a particular user (I'm sure people know who that user is) which is well within the site rules.
.
Why don't they deserve them? Because they actively go on the newest section and upvote the good planes of new users on the site to give them more attention?
One second about to finally show you since you can't see it yourself
I agree that people should do more research
Even when I was newbie on my old account my work still got stolen
For a moderator this was extremely irresponsible (In my opinion)
So first of all your making assumptions I did not persist the argument I did not need to show you your post because it right in front of your face to examine and clearly if I did show you it would be a waste of my time because you would not listen I was not the aggravator of this you were I am allowed to speak freely I simply gave you my opinion (not a angry one) and I told you I said everything I had to say but you kept going about things that weren't even part of the Initial conversation
I haven't broken any rules and if I deserved to be banned for that he does aswell @Shmexysmpilot
Are you threatening to ban me ? ...
I shouldn't need to you can do it yourself even if I did show you it's already there for you to see in your forum post @Squirrel
That is not true if you actually look at what I said @Squirrel
Do you concede and name me winner of the debate?
I interpreted it fine I'm saying that it's hypocritical to say that since you did it yourself and that I'm calm aswell @Squirrel
Your the one who started getting into the definitions in the first place aswell soo
Not by definition and I'm perfectly calm @Squirrel
This is what wiki says about that
.
.
In logic and philosophy, an argument is a series of statements typically used to persuade someone of something or to present reasons for accepting a conclusion.[1][2] The general form of an argument in a natural language is that of premises (typically in the form of propositions, statements or sentences) in support of a claim: the conclusion.[3][4][5] The structure of some arguments can also be set out in a formal language, and formally defined "arguments" can be made independently of natural language arguments, as in math, logic, and computer science.
Well first off it is a argument by definition second off you can easily just look at this yourself and see that these "facts" aren't "facts"
That's not even what I'm talking about though ... @Squirrel
Yes and that means being neutral and not arguing with users like me over something small moderators are expected atleast here to break up arguments and such not create them @Squirrel
Yes I did and it was simple
As a moderator you're a peace maker that means you should be unbiased
That's what I said
And I gave you my well reasoned opinion so you're wrong
This is the actual definition and yes it's basically is
.
.
Constructive criticism is the process of offering valid and well-reasoned opinions about the work of others, usually involving both positive and negative comments, in a friendly manner rather than an oppositional one. The purpose of 'constructive criticism is to improve the outcome.
Constructive criticism* @Squirrel
I've already told you it's not a big deal to me and I'd rather not spend a large amount of time from my day to do so @Squirrel
You're attitude towards them being facts is you're opinion don't state them as facts, It's just friendly constructive criticism
I'd rather not explain everything it would take to long
The old colonel @BirdOfSteel