@FeatherWing Sorry, I sorta vaguely remember making that comment somewhere but didn't quite pay attention to whom. Pretty sure I only started to follow you a few month ago. And it's only now I realized whose plane I commented on. Sorry.
@IceCraft Yes. Read the last paragraph. I used the Taylor's formula (graciously gifted by spefyjerbf, the one and only) to sorta determine how they'd work.
@spefyjerbf Yup, that's why trim is important... Same goes for real-life planes (hell, with lifting surfaces trim would be even worse with speed and lift and the like involved!). Also, those dumb-fire rockets are apparently nuclear-tipped for some reason...
The lore is good, the flight model... Let's just say that the sensitivity on the gyro-stabilizers should be linked to VTOL lever as the plane does not really have a neutral trim: the engines, both the atmospheric plasma drives and the orbital distortion drives have a tendency to pitch the craft up (the fact that the drive have a noticeable "pulse" doesn't help either). Also, as the coding on my own version of the system looks like "(YawRate * 25) - (Yaw * 625)", I'm pretty sure that even with sensitivity control(s) we don't need an entire paragraph's worth of codes...
One quick question: is the Worker's Republic closer to the Nordic States or to the USSR? Basically, what I mean is that a properly regulated market is good but having an authoritarian (or worse, totalitarian) regime that clamps down on basic human rights and freedoms not so much...
@Blaize1380 Guess not everyone knows orkish... Basically what I wanted to say "that's a lot of guns, although there's never a time we can have too many guns, so perhaps we should add even more". Or literally: "more guns, (you can) never (have) enough guns, *maniacal shouting*"
@GESICHERT Ok, it's just that "you can steer while looking at the left and right windows" sentence seems to contradict with the "folding windsield" part so I asked to be sure.
BTW, what's this plane based on?
@GESICHERT "the windshield is foldable and you can steer while looking at the left and right windows"
I assume you mean there are two pilots sitting behind their respective windshield-looking-things on the fuselage? Because IIRC if the pilot sits inside the fuselage and looks through the side windows similar to the Spirit of St. Louis you don't really need those windshields.
"Sometimes the SeaRAM will crash into the water instead of flying to a plane, so only launch it on the water in case it blows the ship up."
Err ...what?
The beam velocity on the radion reactor is a bit too low for stable orbital flight - we've talked about that on the LAF-12 reactor units. Also, the beam cannons can be better at ground attack if there's a slight spread to them - basically, a particle thrower, if you may.
@AzureCorp Ok sorry for that threatening tone, but still, for a successor built on the airframe of the A-10 it feels very wrong to have only a single engine...
f i r s t
@FeatherWing Good. Waiting to see the new plane.
@FeatherWing Sorry, I sorta vaguely remember making that comment somewhere but didn't quite pay attention to whom. Pretty sure I only started to follow you a few month ago. And it's only now I realized whose plane I commented on. Sorry.
Blood for the Blood God! Skull for the Skull Throne!
+1@FeatherWing Starting to wonder if "Osrokee" sounds better...
@FeatherWing Wait that's you? Holy sh#t!
@Greggory005
+1This hack is gonna be pretty useful!Finally...
Gladly!
@IceCraft IIRC there's a mission called the convoy assault...
+1@IceCraft Feel free to try them out! Bombing truck convoys is my favorite past-time anyways...
+1@IceCraft And also yes, those metric-ton monstrosities (the Mk.84 and the tomahawk) is gonna put a huge dent in whatever they hit.
+1@IceCraft Yes. Read the last paragraph. I used the Taylor's formula (graciously gifted by spefyjerbf, the one and only) to sorta determine how they'd work.
+1@FujiwaraAutoShop
+2function = "MultiRole"
Kako! Good ta see ya 'round 'ere!
+1Am I the only one who just spawns a plane loaded with a shit ton of missiles (all set to multirole) and try my damndest to shoot them all down?
+1@MAHADI Exactly.
@Hardy1 Better question: is the replica of a fictional design considered replica or fictional?
+1Given there's only one water molecule, shouldn't it be covalent?
+3Nice one, Abhinav!
+3One cannot do it alone, but tou-can...
Sorry.
@TurtlesThatFly Set the guns to disableAircraftCollisions = "true"
@spefyjerbf Yup, that's why trim is important... Same goes for real-life planes (hell, with lifting surfaces trim would be even worse with speed and lift and the like involved!). Also, those dumb-fire rockets are apparently nuclear-tipped for some reason...
+1The lore is good, the flight model... Let's just say that the sensitivity on the gyro-stabilizers should be linked to VTOL lever as the plane does not really have a neutral trim: the engines, both the atmospheric plasma drives and the orbital distortion drives have a tendency to pitch the craft up (the fact that the drive have a noticeable "pulse" doesn't help either). Also, as the coding on my own version of the system looks like "(YawRate * 25) - (Yaw * 625)", I'm pretty sure that even with sensitivity control(s) we don't need an entire paragraph's worth of codes...
One quick question: is the Worker's Republic closer to the Nordic States or to the USSR? Basically, what I mean is that a properly regulated market is good but having an authoritarian (or worse, totalitarian) regime that clamps down on basic human rights and freedoms not so much...
+1Is it just me or does this resemble the GOG Milano? And of course half of the Star Citizen fleet was added into the mix as well.
+1Cool!
+1I can't decide... Both look so beautiful!
@Blaize1380 Guess not everyone knows orkish... Basically what I wanted to say "that's a lot of guns, although there's never a time we can have too many guns, so perhaps we should add even more". Or literally: "more guns, (you can) never (have) enough guns, *maniacal shouting*"
+1@50CalChicken MOAR. DAKKA.
Ok, silliness aside, I just love the notion of filling the sky with fire and lead.
MOAR DAKKA! NEVAR 'NUFF DAKKA!! WAAAAGGGHHH!!!
@GESICHERT Ok, it's just that "you can steer while looking at the left and right windows" sentence seems to contradict with the "folding windsield" part so I asked to be sure.
+1BTW, what's this plane based on?
"how do you change the text of a link"
I assume this is what you mean?
[text](link)@GESICHERT
+2"the windshield is foldable and you can steer while looking at the left and right windows"
I assume you mean there are two pilots sitting behind their respective windshield-looking-things on the fuselage? Because IIRC if the pilot sits inside the fuselage and looks through the side windows similar to the Spirit of St. Louis you don't really need those windshields.
When you have mors parts than the real thing...
A Focke-Wulf Fw. 200 Condor?
+1The gears look a tad bit too small, but pretty nice otherwise.
+1"Sometimes the SeaRAM will crash into the water instead of flying to a plane, so only launch it on the water in case it blows the ship up."
Err ...what?
Congrats on gold!
Is this supposed to be a farming equipment on Mars or what?
Yes I'm talking about the front wheels resembling something on the mars rovers.
~ We wish you a merry Christmas and a happy new year! ~
@Greggory005 So the enemies are made out of graphite?
+1So... is Karvakia China?
+2@RamboJutter
Not a PC issueWell I mean my laptop starts to melt at 300...
When the number of parts are starting to catch up with the real thing...
f i r s t
+1The beam velocity on the radion reactor is a bit too low for stable orbital flight - we've talked about that on the LAF-12 reactor units. Also, the beam cannons can be better at ground attack if there's a slight spread to them - basically, a particle thrower, if you may.
Holy molly... So this is your take on that Riko guy's sub?
@rexzion Just sorta felt "wait I should have followed that guy a while ago" and...
Ah, the ensign remover, eh?
@AzureCorp True, as long as you don't dive in too steep on a target and got caught by AA further out all is fine, right?
+1@AzureCorp Ok sorry for that threatening tone, but still, for a successor built on the airframe of the A-10 it feels very wrong to have only a single engine...
+1