@BACconcordepilot Oh yes the "Armstrong limit", same thing happens in propellers in submarine. The cavitation phenomenon is caused by boiling bubbles of water from low pressure in the tips on the blades. Imagine that, boiling water below 200 meters of sea. Isn't physics strange ?!
Hey this is very good ! Flies realistic, little faster than the real one but close enough . Deserve a spotlight. Hope to see more general aviation models. Keep up the good work .
@Chancey21 yes that's true, we also exhale oxygen but with lower persentage. For example in CPR we inhale oxygen with 24% and exhale it to the patient with 19% . Inert gases like nitrogen have more significant part in diving (they form bubbles which can block blood circulation) What's why I didn't put them in the article. The main problem by the high altitude is resperatory alkalosis, but this is way more complex reaction for this forum.
@ChiChiWerx Rightly so, of course there are many instances of damage where decompression is gradual. The helios airways accident in 2005 is a classic example.
Companies also do not take into account the problem with ionizing radiation. At least the crew should have dosing meters ,like those used by radiologists.
Even pilots overlook this long-term occupational hazard.
@Thelegitpilot13 Thanks, I hope the other two pieces are equally interesting
@CrashFighter05 At least at sea level is warm, at 8000 feet you should have a very good jacket.
@PositivePlanes LOL :-)
Νo problem. It seems that when you copy a particular block, it also carries all the parts stuck on it. First of all never copy the whole side of the plane together, then if you choose to copy something make sure you first unplug all the joints it has, otherwise you will carry them all together. I recommend keeping a save every 5 parts, so you can go back if something goes wrong. At this point, if you want to save it, just delete bit by bit the side you copied.
If all these don't work, try to add some weight to the opposite side. Start with 50lb near the center and load level, then slowly move to the side until it's balanced. Rarely works but worth the trouble. Ah and don't forget is your cockpit at center?
Hey cool, looks like a combination of Rafale with an F-16, flies well too. If you had flaps and slats set to vtol it would be amazing. Did you make the weapons too?
@Starmang10 @Megamonster Κeep in mind that this is a recreation program. At my opinion it is not so important to seek attention or votes, just have fun. Instead of deleting it, I would recommend congratulating the original design and exchanging views in forum with the user or the community about its use and operation. It would also be nice to read some facts about the historic flight. Use this site as education spark for you and others.
I just used it The folding of the wings is unique, as is your design. It flies pretty well, maybe it needed a little trim or different airfoils as it's a bit nose heavy. However it can land. The design is original and I congratulate you on that, but since you want a more realistic design, I'll point out a few things. On the wings near the fuselage, you have put control surfaces for elevation where you would reasonably expect flaps. Also there are some differences in navigation lights. The green and red should only be visible from the front hemisphere, at the back you have white lights. Keep up the good work
Thanks for the feedback. It's a fantastic opportunity to cover some questions that i always had. The air in higher altitude is less denced and cooler, how a piston engine without spark plugs manage to keep correct mixtures. Is the fuel more like diesel in witch with enough compression autoignits? They have some sort of small turbines to heat and compress the incoming air? Do diesel aviation engines have spark plugs ?
I hope I don't get you tired with all that question storm...
Great article. What type of fuel is best for a piston aviation engine? The new diamond d42 for example has two diesel props. Can compressed liquid gas used in a aviation?
Definitely very beautiful both externally and internally, nice job with the smooth fuselage and you've set up the collective pitch with vtol which is very handy, though there are some minor unrealistic details. The rear propeller is incredibly powerful. I think I saw a speed of 420mph at sea level, in higher altitude it would become supersonic! Another is that as the helicopter has gyros, it acquires a non-plausible ability of tail YAW (even on the ground).
I'm not sure this is the work of a rookie player, but if it really is, it definitely worth a lot of congratulations. Keep up the good work
@edensk you will get it next time, it's very good. Also for the next time it would be nice to read some story for the plane in the description (like a small article with your impression ) Again congratulations.
Sp combines plastic modelism with radio controlled hobbies. If you are detailed enough you can even export some designs for 3d printing. Simple rockets affect smaller groups of people who like more information about a topic with less applications. Sr2 will defenetly be successful because the orbital mechanics are amazing.
I have heard that flights without doors are problematic, but if this leads to consume fuel with realistic rhythm it's...okay 😊. Love general aviation builds, keep up the good work.
Fantastic subject for discussion and very useful informations. When I was making my Augusta 109 I noticed from many comments, that if we think that we know some thinks for airplanes, we know even less for helicopters. To cover the lack of experience many people add gyros who kills all the wonderful realism of flying an rotorcraft.
To return to the subject, I agree that we don't have many pilots in the site, but we sure have tons of innovation. The phenomenon related with the love of aviation, makes people think with creativity, but definitely a discussion on how a model handles is necessary. I hope to see more topic like these in the forum and not necessary from pilots...
Congrats chichi
Nice looks like a digital wingman
+1Oh both aircraft have New Zealand registration codes. Very exotic.Have you been there?
@BACconcordepilot Oh yes the "Armstrong limit", same thing happens in propellers in submarine. The cavitation phenomenon is caused by boiling bubbles of water from low pressure in the tips on the blades. Imagine that, boiling water below 200 meters of sea. Isn't physics strange ?!
nice engine details
Hey this is very good ! Flies realistic, little faster than the real one but close enough . Deserve a spotlight. Hope to see more general aviation models. Keep up the good work .
+3@Starmang10 dear friend, please read comments below. Thanks for downloading , happy flights.
@Chancey21 yes that's true, we also exhale oxygen but with lower persentage. For example in CPR we inhale oxygen with 24% and exhale it to the patient with 19% . Inert gases like nitrogen have more significant part in diving (they form bubbles which can block blood circulation) What's why I didn't put them in the article. The main problem by the high altitude is resperatory alkalosis, but this is way more complex reaction for this forum.
+1Fantastic cockpit ! Congrats
@ChiChiWerx Rightly so, of course there are many instances of damage where decompression is gradual. The helios airways accident in 2005 is a classic example.
Companies also do not take into account the problem with ionizing radiation. At least the crew should have dosing meters ,like those used by radiologists.
Even pilots overlook this long-term occupational hazard.
@bogdanx ...
@Strikefighter04 Thanks. The life of an aviator is not easy at all, we forget how much technology has helped us.
@Thelegitpilot13 Thanks, I hope the other two pieces are equally interesting
+2@CrashFighter05 At least at sea level is warm, at 8000 feet you should have a very good jacket.
@PositivePlanes LOL :-)
@dimkal @chichiwerx
@JamesPlanesii @FlipposMc @Toxicgamer88
Sorry for the untitled tags, there is no category for "articles on flight". You can ask if you have any questions.
+1@Filip109 oh so strange cockpits can't copied.
Hey where have you been ? T please
how this thing levitates ?
Νo problem. It seems that when you copy a particular block, it also carries all the parts stuck on it. First of all never copy the whole side of the plane together, then if you choose to copy something make sure you first unplug all the joints it has, otherwise you will carry them all together. I recommend keeping a save every 5 parts, so you can go back if something goes wrong. At this point, if you want to save it, just delete bit by bit the side you copied.
10.000 AMAZING DOWNLOADS in one month ! Thanks for your interest . Happy flights to all !
@kimimayll Good job !
Very nice design, i believe the rudder is inverted but it has some interesting ideas. Congrats
Wow this is called emphasise in detail. 1100 parts, very nice.
Dude 1600 parts and only 5 votes. What is wrong with these people.
If all these don't work, try to add some weight to the opposite side. Start with 50lb near the center and load level, then slowly move to the side until it's balanced. Rarely works but worth the trouble. Ah and don't forget is your cockpit at center?
Hey cool, looks like a combination of Rafale with an F-16, flies well too. If you had flaps and slats set to vtol it would be amazing. Did you make the weapons too?
@Starmang10 @Megamonster Κeep in mind that this is a recreation program. At my opinion it is not so important to seek attention or votes, just have fun. Instead of deleting it, I would recommend congratulating the original design and exchanging views in forum with the user or the community about its use and operation. It would also be nice to read some facts about the historic flight. Use this site as education spark for you and others.
I just used it The folding of the wings is unique, as is your design. It flies pretty well, maybe it needed a little trim or different airfoils as it's a bit nose heavy. However it can land. The design is original and I congratulate you on that, but since you want a more realistic design, I'll point out a few things. On the wings near the fuselage, you have put control surfaces for elevation where you would reasonably expect flaps. Also there are some differences in navigation lights. The green and red should only be visible from the front hemisphere, at the back you have white lights. Keep up the good work
Very beautiful with true flight characteristics. I hope we see more civilian aircraft like yours
+3Finally our destination is to explore. Nice biuld and with original context, liked your effort to create a cockpit. Keep up the good work
+1Thanks for the feedback. It's a fantastic opportunity to cover some questions that i always had. The air in higher altitude is less denced and cooler, how a piston engine without spark plugs manage to keep correct mixtures. Is the fuel more like diesel in witch with enough compression autoignits? They have some sort of small turbines to heat and compress the incoming air? Do diesel aviation engines have spark plugs ?
I hope I don't get you tired with all that question storm...
Great article. What type of fuel is best for a piston aviation engine? The new diamond d42 for example has two diesel props. Can compressed liquid gas used in a aviation?
Oh I missed that ! Very realistic, also seems unique. What model is that? Is it yours ?
Definitely very beautiful both externally and internally, nice job with the smooth fuselage and you've set up the collective pitch with vtol which is very handy, though there are some minor unrealistic details. The rear propeller is incredibly powerful. I think I saw a speed of 420mph at sea level, in higher altitude it would become supersonic! Another is that as the helicopter has gyros, it acquires a non-plausible ability of tail YAW (even on the ground).
+1I'm not sure this is the work of a rookie player, but if it really is, it definitely worth a lot of congratulations. Keep up the good work
Cool
+1Omg no-one wants general aviation builds. The site is so militarized. I wonder what is the average age of the users in Sp community...
@TurboSnail nope that is not the definition. 😂
@TurboSnail Non taken. like nose heavy? But it's a valid definition, there is a topic in wiki you can check it if you like. It has useful references.
Weaponry questions
Very beautiful work
Looking good.
James, in google wright "sales eagle logo" . It's not necessary to make it exactly the same.
@edensk you will get it next time, it's very good. Also for the next time it would be nice to read some story for the plane in the description (like a small article with your impression ) Again congratulations.
Sp combines plastic modelism with radio controlled hobbies. If you are detailed enough you can even export some designs for 3d printing. Simple rockets affect smaller groups of people who like more information about a topic with less applications. Sr2 will defenetly be successful because the orbital mechanics are amazing.
I have heard that flights without doors are problematic, but if this leads to consume fuel with realistic rhythm it's...okay 😊. Love general aviation builds, keep up the good work.
Fantastic subject for discussion and very useful informations. When I was making my Augusta 109 I noticed from many comments, that if we think that we know some thinks for airplanes, we know even less for helicopters. To cover the lack of experience many people add gyros who kills all the wonderful realism of flying an rotorcraft.
+1To return to the subject, I agree that we don't have many pilots in the site, but we sure have tons of innovation. The phenomenon related with the love of aviation, makes people think with creativity, but definitely a discussion on how a model handles is necessary. I hope to see more topic like these in the forum and not necessary from pilots...
Congrats chichi
Reee
+1A plane orchestra, with amazing amounts of weaponry. Cool build
+1It's nice to see ultralight helicopters. Keep up the good work
+1Interesting control surfaces and beautiful theme. Congrats
Nice