Very good effort, keep up the good work. Helicopters have fantastic physics when they work properly. In my opinion they don't need gyros, it spoils their realistic flight.
The "auto credit thing" is not made by you, is placed in the site from the Simpleplanes team. It is polite to give credit for someones work (or ask) BEFORE you post it . I am saying all this because I made the original "Xantus", iwannabeselected asked before he made a successor .
@Loopedpegasus79 well over 650 is much for my trusty pc, this is why my builds are lite. I believe that u can make great stuffs with simpler methods. Did you like the puffin ? It's little different from the other planes.
Finally a helicopter without a gyro...thank god! Great build and well balanced. If u had the collective pitch set to vtol instead of throttle it would be magnificent. +2 votes for good handling .
@EternalDarkness Just for the sake of discussion as I find the war paranoid. Modern bombers may have kinetic or explosive weapons and not necessarily thermonuclear devices, saturation or percussion attacks are definitely their expertise, the cost of operation ultimately comes to a second degree (a story China learns slowly as it finds solutions to existing problems). The production of these weapons can be as rare as X37 or as common as a Mig-15 with a much simpler design. I also do not believe you have to do a bomber, just their role is not outdated. I am spoiling the wonderful comments on the construction, so I think i will stop. :-) Happy flights.
The cargo on these aircraft may be interchangeable. The advantage is the even more unpredictable track at much lower heights (50000ft). They can also carry radar decoys . Today's defense at ICBM's is largely extra-atmospheric before the heads are disconnected (with the exception of the S-500 and Thaad who doubt if they can handle +6 Max targets). The space bombers of the future will not even need to be manned, even the main body has significant kinetic energy at such speeds.
I'm glad I managed to test your heavy construction. It was definitely worth it, from the vortex generators and the flap joints to the details of the rear wheel, everything was great. Thank you for giving us your love for aviation in your way. Wish to had more votes to give
@EternalDarkness I think the perestroika caught it. ICBMS can't change heading and trajectory drastically while descending in the stratosphere. A space plane can glide with hyper-sonic speeds and lunch from troposphere, so goodnight countermeasures . What do u think X-37 and Shenlong does ? ;-)
I cant run it now from my neolithic pc , but i will give it a go tomorrow from a stronger platform. Until then u definetaly have my vote for your tremendous patient and your love for realistic civilian creations.
Love how the tower stays at a fixed point even the armor construction change direction. Also the wheel system is great. Always like low part builds, it needs more thinking time to make something functional and sufficient at the same time. A am offended by the "potato" definition for old machines, they deserve our love and affection because they work obviously "harder" with lower computing power :-) .
As for the obsolete modern bomber comment, u are forgetting space orbiters like the Tu-2000 family, u can search something like that.
Anyway, great build. Keep it coming
I don't think that WE should vote without downloading it first, but this is how this community works, by voting known images... Have u seen how many votes Su27 or F15's are taking ? ( even the unplayable models) It is at your hand to change it...
Dear friend, I love geostratigic and Korea is the biggest example of interventionist policy in our century's history. Have in mind that when u talk about Japan, u basically referring to the USA's intrests in Chinese sea. The big game is who will control the trade roads to Singapore and from there to Europe. I believe that the best way to peace is the unification of the Korean peninsula. I don't think that there is a high risk of Japanese intervention for now. Remember there is a saying, devide and conquer. I believe that these hostilities are just highlighting the diversification in the area...
I changed platform to run it. even in the 8th generation I5 was a bit difficult, but from a glimpse that I saw it was worth the 1800 pieces. Perfect detail rendering, even the ladder was fantastic. Great aircraft to have in SP. Keep going.
The whole design is beautiful. Τhe part of the cockpit certainly wanted great patience, but the best piece in my view is the landing gears. It flies wonderfully even in vtol mode. Congratulations
@AtlasSP Yes the problem persists, i can add connections but locally and i can't choose any part to connect them except the most close to it. It seems the the recent version has some issues. @WNP78
Nice theme, definitely original as there is only one more in the site. I also welcome you for the complexity and detail of the construction. Certainly there is a rapid improvement in each of your new designs. The airplane is definitely worthwhile to show off and spotlight. Perhaps for some future plan you may have little closer the CoM to CoL so it would be less stable. Congratulations
It was a wonderful competition. Congratulations to all, winners or not, innovation and creativity is the main goal of this program and this challenge was a fine example of it. Happy flights
What ? still not ready? so who cares... handles perfectly, with fantastic control surfaces and great air brakes. Also what is not shown in the photo, the aircraft is made of a real skeleton with many panels. He has a lot of work! Deserves a vote and a spotlight.
I did not write the comment to get you anxious, I think it's nice for all to exchange ideas about aerodynamics. Imagine how the surfaces would work on a normal aircraft. control. Keep up the good work
It looks a bit like a spaceplane, it's beautiful in two colors and it's easy to handle, maybe in needs little more work on layout of control surfaces. When you turn to roll the airlerons move symmetrically like elevatols. Nevertheless, a very good effort
Although I do not like weapons, it was fun. Υou do not have to lock the enemy plane, just when the gun is ready, you tilt your back to it and you easily carve a path in hostile territory. Ideal for escorting fighters or bombers. Maybe we can see the future here. Good try, I would like to have a better handling, but I liked the idea. Happy flights.
First video test of AW109 MedEvac. Coming soon..."T" to to let you know.
Very good effort, keep up the good work. Helicopters have fantastic physics when they work properly. In my opinion they don't need gyros, it spoils their realistic flight.
+4This game is about love for aviation and you transmit it perfectly.
WOW Cool!
it's fictional project?
Wow the quickest feature ever, nice theme!
Oh cool. Love original designs and these are Greek insignias ? Double votes from me!
Great work T please
wow how many parts until now?
The "auto credit thing" is not made by you, is placed in the site from the Simpleplanes team. It is polite to give credit for someones work (or ask) BEFORE you post it . I am saying all this because I made the original "Xantus", iwannabeselected asked before he made a successor .
@Loopedpegasus79 well over 650 is much for my trusty pc, this is why my builds are lite. I believe that u can make great stuffs with simpler methods. Did you like the puffin ? It's little different from the other planes.
So sad that you didn't gave credit to the original design. 😒
@Loopedpegasus79 Always, sp has a great physics engine
Hey cool it has rockets !
very nice !
Finally a helicopter without a gyro...thank god! Great build and well balanced. If u had the collective pitch set to vtol instead of throttle it would be magnificent. +2 votes for good handling .
@EternalDarkness Just for the sake of discussion as I find the war paranoid. Modern bombers may have kinetic or explosive weapons and not necessarily thermonuclear devices, saturation or percussion attacks are definitely their expertise, the cost of operation ultimately comes to a second degree (a story China learns slowly as it finds solutions to existing problems). The production of these weapons can be as rare as X37 or as common as a Mig-15 with a much simpler design. I also do not believe you have to do a bomber, just their role is not outdated. I am spoiling the wonderful comments on the construction, so I think i will stop. :-) Happy flights.
The cargo on these aircraft may be interchangeable. The advantage is the even more unpredictable track at much lower heights (50000ft). They can also carry radar decoys . Today's defense at ICBM's is largely extra-atmospheric before the heads are disconnected (with the exception of the S-500 and Thaad who doubt if they can handle +6 Max targets). The space bombers of the future will not even need to be manned, even the main body has significant kinetic energy at such speeds.
I'm glad I managed to test your heavy construction. It was definitely worth it, from the vortex generators and the flap joints to the details of the rear wheel, everything was great. Thank you for giving us your love for aviation in your way. Wish to had more votes to give
+2@Brendorkus I have a small description , putt vtol up before you start the engines.
@EternalDarkness I think the perestroika caught it. ICBMS can't change heading and trajectory drastically while descending in the stratosphere. A space plane can glide with hyper-sonic speeds and lunch from troposphere, so goodnight countermeasures . What do u think X-37 and Shenlong does ? ;-)
Nice theme
I cant run it now from my neolithic pc , but i will give it a go tomorrow from a stronger platform. Until then u definetaly have my vote for your tremendous patient and your love for realistic civilian creations.
Love how the tower stays at a fixed point even the armor construction change direction. Also the wheel system is great. Always like low part builds, it needs more thinking time to make something functional and sufficient at the same time. A am offended by the "potato" definition for old machines, they deserve our love and affection because they work obviously "harder" with lower computing power :-) .
As for the obsolete modern bomber comment, u are forgetting space orbiters like the Tu-2000 family, u can search something like that.
Anyway, great build. Keep it coming
Cool build
My pc will hate you but...T. I can't miss that beauty.
@Blue0Bull not only get 100 votes,but sometimes get featured... We have recent examples
+1Loved the show. T
I don't think that WE should vote without downloading it first, but this is how this community works, by voting known images... Have u seen how many votes Su27 or F15's are taking ? ( even the unplayable models) It is at your hand to change it...
Dear friend, I love geostratigic and Korea is the biggest example of interventionist policy in our century's history. Have in mind that when u talk about Japan, u basically referring to the USA's intrests in Chinese sea. The big game is who will control the trade roads to Singapore and from there to Europe. I believe that the best way to peace is the unification of the Korean peninsula. I don't think that there is a high risk of Japanese intervention for now. Remember there is a saying, devide and conquer. I believe that these hostilities are just highlighting the diversification in the area...
I changed platform to run it. even in the 8th generation I5 was a bit difficult, but from a glimpse that I saw it was worth the 1800 pieces. Perfect detail rendering, even the ladder was fantastic. Great aircraft to have in SP. Keep going.
+1The whole design is beautiful. Τhe part of the cockpit certainly wanted great patience, but the best piece in my view is the landing gears. It flies wonderfully even in vtol mode. Congratulations
cool
+1@AtlasSP Yes the problem persists, i can add connections but locally and i can't choose any part to connect them except the most close to it. It seems the the recent version has some issues. @WNP78
+2@Nerfenthusiast Probably no one knows exactly. Perhaps we will eventually have to make a tutorial for helicopters...
Superb airplane with very good visibility on the controller and excellent flight behavior. Keep up the good work
+1Nice theme, definitely original as there is only one more in the site. I also welcome you for the complexity and detail of the construction. Certainly there is a rapid improvement in each of your new designs. The airplane is definitely worthwhile to show off and spotlight. Perhaps for some future plan you may have little closer the CoM to CoL so it would be less stable. Congratulations
@Nerfenthusiast thanks it was useful, but do you know what the gyro gain in tail rotors is doing?
@AtlasSP Ok if you disable it and re use it again seems to work properly.
@AtlasSP Same error here. It will help if i unistall it ? @wnpn78
It was a wonderful competition. Congratulations to all, winners or not, innovation and creativity is the main goal of this program and this challenge was a fine example of it. Happy flights
+2Dude ! Α giant seaplane, with impeccable handling. Nothing great you said? Disagree
What ? still not ready? so who cares... handles perfectly, with fantastic control surfaces and great air brakes. Also what is not shown in the photo, the aircraft is made of a real skeleton with many panels. He has a lot of work! Deserves a vote and a spotlight.
+2@Nerfenthusiast oh cool, I am confused by the gyro gain function. If u have a link it will help a lot.
I did not write the comment to get you anxious, I think it's nice for all to exchange ideas about aerodynamics. Imagine how the surfaces would work on a normal aircraft. control. Keep up the good work
It looks a bit like a spaceplane, it's beautiful in two colors and it's easy to handle, maybe in needs little more work on layout of control surfaces. When you turn to roll the airlerons move symmetrically like elevatols. Nevertheless, a very good effort
Although I do not like weapons, it was fun. Υou do not have to lock the enemy plane, just when the gun is ready, you tilt your back to it and you easily carve a path in hostile territory. Ideal for escorting fighters or bombers. Maybe we can see the future here. Good try, I would like to have a better handling, but I liked the idea. Happy flights.
+1It does not matter, floating is another addition. Good job
It is very nice and detailed, but why does it float? is there amphibious version?
I think you could do it even without the gyroscopes. Good effort for VTOL. Don't forget to write a description, it is essential.
+1