The "auto credit thing" is not made by you, is placed in the site from the Simpleplanes team. It is polite to give credit for someones work (or ask) BEFORE you post it . I am saying all this because I made the original "Xantus", iwannabeselected asked before he made a successor .
@Loopedpegasus79 well over 650 is much for my trusty pc, this is why my builds are lite. I believe that u can make great stuffs with simpler methods. Did you like the puffin ? It's little different from the other planes.
Finally a helicopter without a gyro...thank god! Great build and well balanced. If u had the collective pitch set to vtol instead of throttle it would be magnificent. +2 votes for good handling .
@EternalDarkness Just for the sake of discussion as I find the war paranoid. Modern bombers may have kinetic or explosive weapons and not necessarily thermonuclear devices, saturation or percussion attacks are definitely their expertise, the cost of operation ultimately comes to a second degree (a story China learns slowly as it finds solutions to existing problems). The production of these weapons can be as rare as X37 or as common as a Mig-15 with a much simpler design. I also do not believe you have to do a bomber, just their role is not outdated. I am spoiling the wonderful comments on the construction, so I think i will stop. :-) Happy flights.
The cargo on these aircraft may be interchangeable. The advantage is the even more unpredictable track at much lower heights (50000ft). They can also carry radar decoys . Today's defense at ICBM's is largely extra-atmospheric before the heads are disconnected (with the exception of the S-500 and Thaad who doubt if they can handle +6 Max targets). The space bombers of the future will not even need to be manned, even the main body has significant kinetic energy at such speeds.
@EternalDarkness I think the perestroika caught it. ICBMS can't change heading and trajectory drastically while descending in the stratosphere. A space plane can glide with hyper-sonic speeds and lunch from troposphere, so goodnight countermeasures . What do u think X-37 and Shenlong does ? ;-)
I cant run it now from my neolithic pc , but i will give it a go tomorrow from a stronger platform. Until then u definetaly have my vote for your tremendous patient and your love for realistic civilian creations.
Love how the tower stays at a fixed point even the armor construction change direction. Also the wheel system is great. Always like low part builds, it needs more thinking time to make something functional and sufficient at the same time. A am offended by the "potato" definition for old machines, they deserve our love and affection because they work obviously "harder" with lower computing power :-) .
As for the obsolete modern bomber comment, u are forgetting space orbiters like the Tu-2000 family, u can search something like that.
Anyway, great build. Keep it coming
I don't think that WE should vote without downloading it first, but this is how this community works, by voting known images... Have u seen how many votes Su27 or F15's are taking ? ( even the unplayable models) It is at your hand to change it...
Dear friend, I love geostratigic and Korea is the biggest example of interventionist policy in our century's history. Have in mind that when u talk about Japan, u basically referring to the USA's intrests in Chinese sea. The big game is who will control the trade roads to Singapore and from there to Europe. I believe that the best way to peace is the unification of the Korean peninsula. I don't think that there is a high risk of Japanese intervention for now. Remember there is a saying, devide and conquer. I believe that these hostilities are just highlighting the diversification in the area...
The whole design is beautiful. Τhe part of the cockpit certainly wanted great patience, but the best piece in my view is the landing gears. It flies wonderfully even in vtol mode. Congratulations
Nice theme, definitely original as there is only one more in the site. I also welcome you for the complexity and detail of the construction. Certainly there is a rapid improvement in each of your new designs. The airplane is definitely worthwhile to show off and spotlight. Perhaps for some future plan you may have little closer the CoM to CoL so it would be less stable. Congratulations
I did not write the comment to get you anxious, I think it's nice for all to exchange ideas about aerodynamics. Imagine how the surfaces would work on a normal aircraft. control. Keep up the good work
It looks a bit like a spaceplane, it's beautiful in two colors and it's easy to handle, maybe in needs little more work on layout of control surfaces. When you turn to roll the airlerons move symmetrically like elevatols. Nevertheless, a very good effort
@sheepsblood well f35b it is not that bad, c is little boring, but b it is a very interesting candidate for top gun. I think that the screenwriter was political friend of Trump lol... We all know his weakness in order stuffs
@dimcal Thanks for the vote and the spotlight. I'm glad to see you again, did you finally find some time to try it out? I would like your opinion on the control surfaces.
Don't try to fit the cockpit in, make a separate subassembly, save it and scale it down all together. After that, make a small fuselage connector to the place where you like to put it and gradually reduce the length. Here you go the cockpit sits on the spot all by it self. If you like you can use this
@Benslayer12 I have a description, but I land it somewhat differently. I go to the point at full speed, when I reach 200 meters away from it, I press AG1, put it vertically, open the legs with G and slow down decrease VTOL . You can also move on the hover mode with pitch and yaw. 4 from 5 times you can land in carrier with success . Happy flights and tell me if that helped.
Fantastic job in details. Probably the best ejection seat so far, nice CoM and control surfaces. Perhaps airbrakes should be independent . congratulations
I some times wright for fun something in non functional stuff as rotors in my planes. As for example in the Mig 8 in the rotors that simulating the piston I wrote the year and the model as output. It's also a way to copyright stuff, but I personally think that community works better with common sense of understanding of each other ideas.
wow how many parts until now?
The "auto credit thing" is not made by you, is placed in the site from the Simpleplanes team. It is polite to give credit for someones work (or ask) BEFORE you post it . I am saying all this because I made the original "Xantus", iwannabeselected asked before he made a successor .
@Loopedpegasus79 well over 650 is much for my trusty pc, this is why my builds are lite. I believe that u can make great stuffs with simpler methods. Did you like the puffin ? It's little different from the other planes.
So sad that you didn't gave credit to the original design. 😒
@Loopedpegasus79 Always, sp has a great physics engine
Hey cool it has rockets !
very nice !
Finally a helicopter without a gyro...thank god! Great build and well balanced. If u had the collective pitch set to vtol instead of throttle it would be magnificent. +2 votes for good handling .
@EternalDarkness Just for the sake of discussion as I find the war paranoid. Modern bombers may have kinetic or explosive weapons and not necessarily thermonuclear devices, saturation or percussion attacks are definitely their expertise, the cost of operation ultimately comes to a second degree (a story China learns slowly as it finds solutions to existing problems). The production of these weapons can be as rare as X37 or as common as a Mig-15 with a much simpler design. I also do not believe you have to do a bomber, just their role is not outdated. I am spoiling the wonderful comments on the construction, so I think i will stop. :-) Happy flights.
The cargo on these aircraft may be interchangeable. The advantage is the even more unpredictable track at much lower heights (50000ft). They can also carry radar decoys . Today's defense at ICBM's is largely extra-atmospheric before the heads are disconnected (with the exception of the S-500 and Thaad who doubt if they can handle +6 Max targets). The space bombers of the future will not even need to be manned, even the main body has significant kinetic energy at such speeds.
@Brendorkus I have a small description , putt vtol up before you start the engines.
@EternalDarkness I think the perestroika caught it. ICBMS can't change heading and trajectory drastically while descending in the stratosphere. A space plane can glide with hyper-sonic speeds and lunch from troposphere, so goodnight countermeasures . What do u think X-37 and Shenlong does ? ;-)
Nice theme
I cant run it now from my neolithic pc , but i will give it a go tomorrow from a stronger platform. Until then u definetaly have my vote for your tremendous patient and your love for realistic civilian creations.
Love how the tower stays at a fixed point even the armor construction change direction. Also the wheel system is great. Always like low part builds, it needs more thinking time to make something functional and sufficient at the same time. A am offended by the "potato" definition for old machines, they deserve our love and affection because they work obviously "harder" with lower computing power :-) .
As for the obsolete modern bomber comment, u are forgetting space orbiters like the Tu-2000 family, u can search something like that.
Anyway, great build. Keep it coming
Cool build
My pc will hate you but...T. I can't miss that beauty.
Loved the show. T
I don't think that WE should vote without downloading it first, but this is how this community works, by voting known images... Have u seen how many votes Su27 or F15's are taking ? ( even the unplayable models) It is at your hand to change it...
Dear friend, I love geostratigic and Korea is the biggest example of interventionist policy in our century's history. Have in mind that when u talk about Japan, u basically referring to the USA's intrests in Chinese sea. The big game is who will control the trade roads to Singapore and from there to Europe. I believe that the best way to peace is the unification of the Korean peninsula. I don't think that there is a high risk of Japanese intervention for now. Remember there is a saying, devide and conquer. I believe that these hostilities are just highlighting the diversification in the area...
The whole design is beautiful. Τhe part of the cockpit certainly wanted great patience, but the best piece in my view is the landing gears. It flies wonderfully even in vtol mode. Congratulations
@Nerfenthusiast Probably no one knows exactly. Perhaps we will eventually have to make a tutorial for helicopters...
Nice theme, definitely original as there is only one more in the site. I also welcome you for the complexity and detail of the construction. Certainly there is a rapid improvement in each of your new designs. The airplane is definitely worthwhile to show off and spotlight. Perhaps for some future plan you may have little closer the CoM to CoL so it would be less stable. Congratulations
@Nerfenthusiast thanks it was useful, but do you know what the gyro gain in tail rotors is doing?
@AtlasSP Ok if you disable it and re use it again seems to work properly.
@AtlasSP Same error here. It will help if i unistall it ? @wnpn78
Dude ! Α giant seaplane, with impeccable handling. Nothing great you said? Disagree
@Nerfenthusiast oh cool, I am confused by the gyro gain function. If u have a link it will help a lot.
I did not write the comment to get you anxious, I think it's nice for all to exchange ideas about aerodynamics. Imagine how the surfaces would work on a normal aircraft. control. Keep up the good work
It looks a bit like a spaceplane, it's beautiful in two colors and it's easy to handle, maybe in needs little more work on layout of control surfaces. When you turn to roll the airlerons move symmetrically like elevatols. Nevertheless, a very good effort
It does not matter, floating is another addition. Good job
It is very nice and detailed, but why does it float? is there amphibious version?
@toxicgamer88 Εντάξει, δεν ήταν κακό. Οι επιφάνειες ελέγχου ήταν πρωτότυπες. Πως πάει το X-wing?
Τι είναι ακριβώς αυτό; Πως πετάει;
@sheepsblood well f35b it is not that bad, c is little boring, but b it is a very interesting candidate for top gun. I think that the screenwriter was political friend of Trump lol... We all know his weakness in order stuffs
Looks good so far, don't stay only in the details, often large builds have auto roll issues, check it from time to time and make multiple saves.
@toxicgamer88 it is vtol? How many parts?
May the force be with you.
@dimcal Thanks for the vote and the spotlight. I'm glad to see you again, did you finally find some time to try it out? I would like your opinion on the control surfaces.
Don't try to fit the cockpit in, make a separate subassembly, save it and scale it down all together. After that, make a small fuselage connector to the place where you like to put it and gradually reduce the length. Here you go the cockpit sits on the spot all by it self. If you like you can use this
T, looks fantastic
Oh dear Lord, an F-18 movie. 🏍😩
@Chancey21 How a plane with high amount of dihendral expected to fly?
There is a bug in win 10. If left without updates for enough time , the hard disc Keeps running at 100% . Check your task manager .
@Benslayer12 I have a description, but I land it somewhat differently. I go to the point at full speed, when I reach 200 meters away from it, I press AG1, put it vertically, open the legs with G and slow down decrease VTOL . You can also move on the hover mode with pitch and yaw. 4 from 5 times you can land in carrier with success . Happy flights and tell me if that helped.
It flies smoothly, nice CoM and CoL. In general a good plane, keep up the good work
Fantastic job in details. Probably the best ejection seat so far, nice CoM and control surfaces. Perhaps airbrakes should be independent . congratulations
@atzh thank you for following ! Happy flights
Oh wow ! Perfect landing gears, fantastic painting , flawless flying . Beautiful combination for success . Shame that i can not spotlight it .
I some times wright for fun something in non functional stuff as rotors in my planes. As for example in the Mig 8 in the rotors that simulating the piston I wrote the year and the model as output. It's also a way to copyright stuff, but I personally think that community works better with common sense of understanding of each other ideas.