Excuse me but what the heck since when are you not allowed to voice your political opinion in a PRIVATE setting. No respect for the SP devs after that low move. Let people voice their opinions its none of your business and it absolutely didnt affect the moderation capability. Shame on everyone involved in this blatant attack on free speech, including the snowflake that reported ED.
@Alfredali1382 No problem. Some things I like about this are the building techniques you used, and the engine interior, very cool. Hopefully we see more cool stuff from you.
First off, great looking engine, and nice job making this.
Secondly, I hope you can take constructive criticism because I'm unfortunately about to be that guy. I just wanted to point out some major inaccuracies I noticed.
First of all is the engines name. Contrary to what it might look like, this engine has no relation to the Rolls Royce RB211, and in fact wasn't built by Rolls Royce (Although they did play a role). The engine was built by, as the title suggests, IAE (International Aero Engines), a collaboration between Pratt & Whitney, Rolls Royce, MTU Aero Engines, and Japanese Aero Engines.
That's probably the easiest of these issues to fix.
Next problem I saw is the engines reverse thrust system. I can see how it can be confused with the Airbus A320s CFM56-5B with its bucket-type reversers, but the IAE instead uses the nowadays more common sleeve system, with the back half of the engine nacelle sliding backwards to allow air to redirect forward out of the engine.
Along with this, the engines shape is wrong. While you did get the main form correct with the inlet that leads to a long nacelle that covers the exhaust nozzles and shrinks slightly at the end, you failed to slant the inlet like on the real engine. Along with this, the inlet itself is too small in relation with the rest of the engine. You also seem to have forgotten to add the exhaust cone at the back of the nacelle, making the engine appear too short, and allowing the engine exhaust to extend past the end of the engine nacelle. On top of this, you made an engine with a circular cross-section while the real engine is closer to a square (which seems to be a popular error when someone recreates the V2500 so don't start thinking you're alone in this).
Last and definitely least, 8̶4̶2̶,̶7̶0̶6̶ ̶l̶b̶s̶ ̶o̶f̶ ̶t̶h̶r̶u̶s̶t̶
@4Luis2Silva Weird, I've never seen this issue before. Its probably just a problem with the crappy wheels that SP provides, they tend to not like being put under a large build and connected to a rotator/shock.
@WolfSpark Possibly, or if Judroo makes some airfoil models for the wings. Would also be nice if multiple said airfoils were able to be assembled into custom control surfaces off of a wing. A very specific request for the devs if they want me to come back.
wait what i thought i uploaded this unlisted lol
@BeastHunter yes
+1@BeastHunter what you roasted yourself?
+1@Gru1 indeed lol
@BeastHunter boom roasted
+1@jamesPLANESii YOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
@OrderlyHippo Yeah, can probably fix that with some control nozzles on the aft.
@TerTech yeet
If you're a guy and you kill a guy its technically homocide
+1Looks absolutely outstanding so far!
+1@arcjwood added
A man of culture
I like 1
@MrBomboclaat very cool!
@SimpleplanesTerTech yeet
@LieutenantSOT done
I did just see the comment that got him banned, ngl its pretty messed up
+11@jamesPLANESii is that what happened
Excuse me but what the heck since when are you not allowed to voice your political opinion in a PRIVATE setting. No respect for the SP devs after that low move. Let people voice their opinions its none of your business and it absolutely didnt affect the moderation capability. Shame on everyone involved in this blatant attack on free speech, including the snowflake that reported ED.
+23@PLNE epic
@PLNE It will be very innacurate if you do
@NygelTern no u didnt lol
So youre basically paying $10 for VR support?
+1@SmallyRocket Just edited, thanks!
Portions are a bit off but this is a huge improvement, I love how the nacelle opens. Keep them coming!
+1@Alfredali1382 No problem. Some things I like about this are the building techniques you used, and the engine interior, very cool. Hopefully we see more cool stuff from you.
+1First off, great looking engine, and nice job making this.
Secondly, I hope you can take constructive criticism because I'm unfortunately about to be that guy. I just wanted to point out some major inaccuracies I noticed.
First of all is the engines name. Contrary to what it might look like, this engine has no relation to the Rolls Royce RB211, and in fact wasn't built by Rolls Royce (Although they did play a role). The engine was built by, as the title suggests, IAE (International Aero Engines), a collaboration between Pratt & Whitney, Rolls Royce, MTU Aero Engines, and Japanese Aero Engines.
That's probably the easiest of these issues to fix.
Next problem I saw is the engines reverse thrust system. I can see how it can be confused with the Airbus A320s CFM56-5B with its bucket-type reversers, but the IAE instead uses the nowadays more common sleeve system, with the back half of the engine nacelle sliding backwards to allow air to redirect forward out of the engine.
Along with this, the engines shape is wrong. While you did get the main form correct with the inlet that leads to a long nacelle that covers the exhaust nozzles and shrinks slightly at the end, you failed to slant the inlet like on the real engine. Along with this, the inlet itself is too small in relation with the rest of the engine. You also seem to have forgotten to add the exhaust cone at the back of the nacelle, making the engine appear too short, and allowing the engine exhaust to extend past the end of the engine nacelle. On top of this, you made an engine with a circular cross-section while the real engine is closer to a square (which seems to be a popular error when someone recreates the V2500 so don't start thinking you're alone in this).
Last and definitely least, 8̶4̶2̶,̶7̶0̶6̶ ̶l̶b̶s̶ ̶o̶f̶ ̶t̶h̶r̶u̶s̶t̶
+3@TatsuTheDemonLord Thanks!
+1@MintLynx He didnt steal my stuff HAHAHAAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAH
@AndrewGarrison noice
Im working on contacting the shapeways team rn
@4Luis2Silva Weird, I've never seen this issue before. Its probably just a problem with the crappy wheels that SP provides, they tend to not like being put under a large build and connected to a rotator/shock.
+1@BaconEggs thanks dude, go get some triple digits.
@asteroidbook345 Adios
@4Luis2Silva Weird. How soft/hard are your landings and what physics setting are you on (low, med, high)? Also don't try taxiing this in crosswinds.
@WolfSpark Possibly, or if Judroo makes some airfoil models for the wings. Would also be nice if multiple said airfoils were able to be assembled into custom control surfaces off of a wing. A very specific request for the devs if they want me to come back.
@Augusta I drive a linear :(
@Star737 This is most likely my last ever upload
+1@Augusta saab
@TheVexedVortex Are you on mobile?
@EternalDarkness I did try fixing it a while ago, but I think I just designed it really bad because my fix made it worse.
@WiiHoldingTheMini yes but also no
@Planes000 nice alt lol
+1@MiksTheDud sure
@JustNormalPerson As long as you're not on a potato
Me
so uhh this is spam post who gonna report it first
@Kennneth huge stonks
@SyntheticL Added!
@benjiboyy06 Added!