@SpetzavodHeavyIndustries, that's fine. Even if you never leave the drawing board, still if you follow the drawing, it is a replica. By the way, reading your bio, have you ever grown up in a Socialist country? because that is how I grew up as a kid.
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 fictional ones are okay, but it should meet the 1950s-Present requirement. Meet the tech and style of the era you choose. And it is very likely to loose the points.
@Monarchii Well, I do painting too. Impressionist paintings are not realistic like classical paintings, but they give the mood of what the artist is trying to express - beautifully. Like your PEA or MAPA's staff. I feel them like an impressionist painting. For those with 3000 parts, are very detailed "classical paintings"
@Monarchii Totally agreed! Less part count doesn't mean a crap always. it is like comparing an impressionist painting to a traditional classical painting. It has a different taste.
@VeryPlain true, I get it. Just my suggestion, if you want to make it more realistic, you could remove the side intakes. also make the front fuselage a bit wider.
Lol, I like the ending of your story - how they are end up in PLAAF. My suggestion, if you had intake like MiG21, you can remove the side intakes which I did before.
@Christiant2 well, may be a bit similar, But Tornado is a much larger fighter and also had a variable geomatry wings (like F-14, F111, MiG23). Alphajet is a small trainer.
@SpetzavodHeavyIndustries, that's fine. Even if you never leave the drawing board, still if you follow the drawing, it is a replica. By the way, reading your bio, have you ever grown up in a Socialist country? because that is how I grew up as a kid.
Awesome! you pass the first test. Spotlighted and upvoted. Good luck for the challenge
@AndiTontrando no problem
awesome build.
this plane was on my bucket list to build too.
@SomeSPGuyWhoLikesLore Lol :P a little bit of flesh
Thank You! @Liquidfox01 @ ShinyGemsBro @LunarEclipseSP
+2Thank you @Jaspy190 , that is fast
+1@IQinventory sure. Please ask them
+1@Victoriouswings yes. Make sure the fictional one matches the era
@Dragoranos I consider both planes design started in the late 1930s or early 40s. I am looking something after 1945 to date. Thanks for asking
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 fictional ones are okay, but it should meet the 1950s-Present requirement. Meet the tech and style of the era you choose. And it is very likely to loose the points.
@TheAerospacecraftNerd77 sorry for this time, I have some work outside to do
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 good. Now I see. Spotlighted. Good luck with your chellenge
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 really, I did not see it
Once you upload, EVERY DECENT BUILD WILL GET AN UPVOTE, and Good ones may get a SPOT
@Apollo018362 @MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 we got to join each other - lol
+1Spotlighted! Oops. we both did in the same day. May be I have to join you and you got to join my challenge. Lol
+1@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 that is fast like an SR-71
@Monarchii Well, I do painting too. Impressionist paintings are not realistic like classical paintings, but they give the mood of what the artist is trying to express - beautifully. Like your PEA or MAPA's staff. I feel them like an impressionist painting. For those with 3000 parts, are very detailed "classical paintings"
+1wow looks nice
balls connected to form a line .... Line Ball LOL
@Monarchii Totally agreed! Less part count doesn't mean a crap always. it is like comparing an impressionist painting to a traditional classical painting. It has a different taste.
+1I saw two C-119s at the Air Mobility Command Museum last year. It is big. The landing gear was interesting.
+1@kumoroha165 I can see in the details your work. Awesome. well, I wasn't on Twitter for a long time, since it became X
and wow, you were here 8.8 years ago. And welcome back!
+1nice smooth F16. great build
+2your tanks are spot on!
+1lovely
@Yippie627 thanks for the support!
@VeryPlain true, I get it. Just my suggestion, if you want to make it more realistic, you could remove the side intakes. also make the front fuselage a bit wider.
nice work - looks beautiful
@L1nus I see. No wonder. Physics and engineering are the main parts to enjoy this game (apart form XML)
@L1nus Your cars are so good.
Congratulation
+1classic American muscle! great build. It is so much of detail, so beautiful
Lol, I like the ending of your story - how they are end up in PLAAF. My suggestion, if you had intake like MiG21, you can remove the side intakes which I did before.
@Christiant2 well, may be a bit similar, But Tornado is a much larger fighter and also had a variable geomatry wings (like F-14, F111, MiG23). Alphajet is a small trainer.
+1@DrakonDynamics You got a nice logo, by the way - also the typography. I guess you did it yourself
+1Interesting challenge especially with your Story background and awesome world map. Highlighted for more to notice - and good luck!
+1Excellent job. Best wishes for your school project.
love the engine nacelles
+1nice work - thanks for sharing
+1@RealMicroZackSP sure, I will be waiting. tag me
+1@RealMicroZackSP Thanks
don't let the pilot suck into the jet intake during ejection!
@TheAerospacecraftNerd77 I am glad to know that
Thank you guys! @IQinventory @Liquidfox01 @Trainzo
+1@Christiant2 @Mosquitowithagun thank you guys
+1ta...dar
Welcome back @TheMouse