@JEST
tail rotor does that, don't worry about it
you can counter it with an over the top FT code so that when you roll it would retain wherever it's last position was but it will correct itself if it does an uncommanded roll
or just use Gyroscopes, they're much easier to deal with
I am going to actually answer seriously bc april fools is kinda dumb
I'm not exactly sure why this happens, but reducing the sideways traction works
you can also go into further lengths by editing the value for slipSidewaysAsymptote and slipSidewaysExtremum just so you can retain that grip which the traction gives
damn.
nice one
not to be annoying or anything, but it looks like a mash of multiple european fighters and a certain eastern fighter
and it's executed very epiquely
btw is it ok if say I use an additional engine to add some effect?
it won't affect the thrust of the aircraft, but it does something to the aircraft, like increase fuel consumption or cool afterburner effects
man depression hits hard.
but seeking help more often than not works, so I suggest do that first before giving up
you've made it this far, don't waste it
one reason is that the vr came out about a year ago, so while some planes that are around 1.4 years old are already vr capable, beyond that no planes are capable to play in vr as they don't have the necessary parts to be played in the vr
unless I'm misunderstanding something here, that is my opinion
I discussed somethings about tank cannon ballistics in SP with a tank enthusiast a while ago and I think there's a better way to do this but I'm not sure how to implement it
@JEST
tail rotor does that, don't worry about it
you can counter it with an over the top FT code so that when you roll it would retain wherever it's last position was but it will correct itself if it does an uncommanded roll
or just use Gyroscopes, they're much easier to deal with
@UnmanagedReservoir
ah
I was thinking the delta wing was inspired more towards the gripen
looks good. tail rotor's on the other side though.
something to do with
+1sum(x)andsmooth(x)IdkI am going to actually answer seriously bc april fools is kinda dumb
+1I'm not exactly sure why this happens, but reducing the sideways traction works
you can also go into further lengths by editing the value for
slipSidewaysAsymptoteandslipSidewaysExtremumjust so you can retain that grip which the traction givessome image editing stuff
+1and reshade probably
reshade you can't get on mobile though because mod
damn.
+3nice one
not to be annoying or anything, but it looks like a mash of multiple european fighters and a certain eastern fighter
and it's executed very epiquely
@MrCOPTY
+1thanks
@xNotDumb
yeah, it has been like 5 or 6 days ago, maybe even more tbh
@AnomalyYeet
+1whoops. Was making that. Now I'm considering making a different one.
...nah.
@xNotDumb
days
btw is it ok if say I use an additional engine to add some effect?
it won't affect the thrust of the aircraft, but it does something to the aircraft, like increase fuel consumption or cool afterburner effects
SHEIT I forgot about this challenge
I'm joining
+1say no more.
@Ac3Zodiac
thanks.
@WinsWings
+1thanks!
@teddyone02
why not?
@DTMF
ty :)
CAPE PHYSICS
+2@CL125
thank you :)
@Erc90F4RU
+1no it's not bannable
it's cited in the site rules
how many people actually read the site rules lmao
man depression hits hard.
but seeking help more often than not works, so I suggest do that first before giving up
you've made it this far, don't waste it
because these kinda things appeals to the male population what else do you expect
+2lmfao
what in the belkan manufacturing is THAT
+3that does not look like an NEU fighter lmfao
remember, you can always use swastikas for historical accuracy
+1@SyntheticL
+2maybe, stay tuned for updates I guess.
@RYAviation
+1you gotta compensate for it unfortunately...
but the nice thing about it is you can ripple the gbus :D
@OttoPasevall
ty!
@teddyone02
you can make one yourself if you want, I'm not doing it however because I'm a lazy ass mf
@MABUR
+1beliau ini melawak 😂
thanks sekali lagi btw!
@Dragoranos
I'd disagree on that, but thanks!
@ReinMcDeer
arigatou!
@xNotDumb
glad to be here, yoroshiku!
@MAPA
thanks
@Bird6369
lazy
if you wanna make one yourself go ahead
@HoshimachiSuiseiMyBeloved
ty
@WiniMii
tyty
@MABUR
makasih mas
epic
+1do you perhaps play on low physics?
+1if yes, there you go.
@Kazin
well then it's just my muisunderstanding, apologies
@Kazin
have you by chance already logged on to SPVR?
the unconcorde concorde
+1haram
(for context, the silver color on the aircraft is the actual material color for the aircraft)
there's many things, tbh
+3but the comment below explains it pretty well
one reason is that the vr came out about a year ago, so while some planes that are around 1.4 years old are already vr capable, beyond that no planes are capable to play in vr as they don't have the necessary parts to be played in the vr
unless I'm misunderstanding something here, that is my opinion
dedication. epique.
I discussed somethings about tank cannon ballistics in SP with a tank enthusiast a while ago and I think there's a better way to do this but I'm not sure how to implement it
tomcat spree is happening again damn
+1gloria mutat valde razgriz revelat.
+1ipsum sua daemon fundit mortem.