4,165 chemmey Comments

  • Analog Altimeter (Low Part Count- 44) 4.0 years ago

    It might come handy.. If used credit is needed?

  • Ships Ordering Forum [Closed For Undetermined Amount Of Time] 4.0 years ago

    @WarshipDude np. I'll wait :D

  • Ships Ordering Forum [Closed For Undetermined Amount Of Time] 4.0 years ago

    @WarshipDude No. The runway must be wide enough for this smoll guy

  • Ships Ordering Forum [Closed For Undetermined Amount Of Time] 4.0 years ago

    Method: Role Specific Design
    Name: Type 1-0 Carrier (CVE-1M)
    Displacement: 12k - 16k tons
    Speed: 16-18 knots
    _
    _
    Make it as low part count as you can :-

  • The plane that broke my SP 4.0 years ago

    @PointlessWhyshouldi lol.. but seriously it actually broke my game :/

  • Need help with rudder 4.1 years ago

    @ChiChiWerx ouhh.... I see. Thank you for the explanation. I appreciate very much :)

  • U4 4.1 years ago

    Hello there! I've tested it out and let see what we can improve here :D

    Ok let's start with the plane itself.

    The plane looks good. No problem whatsoever. It is indeed a simple, fictional and cute little biplane. I was wondering, why this plane doesn't have an empennage or the horizontal stabilizers. Do you any issues with them? Like being wobbly during pitching?

    The performance is the interesting part. It flies decently for me. But having a small issues with the roll sensitivity plus the pitch. On ground it is even weirder. When I tried to takeoff, it will climb a bit and then nose dive into the runway. I've tried adjusting the CoM and the CoL to create a small gap between 'em. Nope this thing really wanna kill the runway. My opinion is on the elevators, which was on the main wings. I think it was the cause of this problem. Not sure tho.

    Next, the wheels and..... The torps. I think it'll blow up if I spawn on the ground. The propellor of the torps actually made a contact with the ground. How to fix? I've just move them a bit forward so the are somewhat at the leading edge of the wing. So it's no a really big deal.

    Overall I just like how the plane looks :) Just need some performance tweaks. Btw, before you post anything tag me in an unlisted so I can help before you publish the aircraft. Hope this help and I'm looking forward to work with you soon :D

    __i.e-sorry if this offend you

    +1
  • G.43 (WW2 fighter) 4.1 years ago

    @RunForestRun imma check it out rn

  • G.43 (WW2 fighter) 4.1 years ago

    @RunForestRun the U4?

  • Experiment-1 4.1 years ago

    @50CalChicken thank you :D

  • Experiment-1 4.1 years ago

    @Astro12 thank you :)

  • Experiment-1 4.1 years ago

    @IHateAirbusA330 thank you :D

  • Experiment-1 4.1 years ago

    @SemedianIndustries @Ghostium @WorldofWarships thank you. :)

    +1
  • XPF-1 Mittens Teaser 4.1 years ago

    @Darg12e when typing the ! [] () Make sure do not space it tho.

    +1
  • XPF-1 Mittens Teaser 4.1 years ago

    @Darg12e first go to images - direct link converter websites. I use the bbcode0 websites
    Upload the image and copy the direct link.
    Then do ! [] ()

  • MIG Challenge [Ended] 4.1 years ago

    I'm joining. MiG-21 Fishbed

  • Ridge XP-21 Martin 4.1 years ago

    @Cvpigunguy Oh I see. Thanks for the advice :D

  • Ridge XP-21 Martin 4.1 years ago

    @Cvpigunguy Exactly. That's why I've never done one. I usually sticks with tail-draggers. But now, I'm interested in. Also did you pitch the props for push?

  • Ridge XP-21 Martin 4.1 years ago

    @Cvpigunguy I've never make one of them. Kinda want to make one XD

  • Ridge XP-21 Martin 4.1 years ago

    Nice design. You have a misunderstanding with pull-push. Push props supposed to face backwards while pull are facing forward. Hope this does not offend you. Have a nice day :)

  • junkers ju-52 (pls fix) 4.1 years ago

    Hello there. I found a couple improvements that can be made.

    1. The wings. They cannot produce enough lifts for the weight. Your wing loading is extaggering 260kg/m². Try reduce some weights
    2. Angle your wing upward a tiny bit. This will make the wing Aoa (Angle of Attack) increases. This can aid the wing to provide enough lift. If too far, they stall.
    3. Drag are the major issues. This kind of plane should not exceed 6000-7000 -ish. Drag slow your plane down a lot. I mean a lot.

    That's it so far. I hope this help you friend :D . Have a nice day

  • Well boys we did it. 4.1 years ago

    @Default4 Maybe... I haven't noticed yet. Maybe in the future I will :)

    +1
  • Well boys we did it. 4.1 years ago

    Mine just pass the Bandit tho....

  • SUV 4.1 years ago

    Nise!

  • G.43 (WW2 fighter) 4.1 years ago

    @RunForestRun If need you need help with aerofoils or performance adjustment, let me know :D

  • G.43 (WW2 fighter) 4.1 years ago

    Hello there. I already test it out. I want to give some feedbacks about this design. Hope it'll help in the next one.

    1. The plane size is more to light bomber-ish
    2. The plane speed is somewhat under 200 kts. The speed can go a little higher.
    3. Drag is a major issues. It decrease your plane speed and capabilities a lot. I recommend somewhat 1000-ish drag points. That should do for this type of plane.
    4. The wing shape can be work on more.
    5. Are the wheels inspired from BF-109? if so try angle them a bit outward so it can give the plane more stability during T/O and Landing
    6. The design is gorgeous and potential to me. But it can be improved a lot more. I could help with that.

    If this comment offend you. Please Ignore . I hope this can help. I'm ready for shape and wing airfoils problem. See ya :D

    +2
  • Nuclear Warhead T-01E 4.1 years ago

    @CursedKnots Ahh... I see. Sorry for the misidentification. :D

  • Nuclear Warhead T-01E 4.1 years ago

    @CursedKnots wait. You are Malaysian?

  • Nuclear Warhead T-01E 4.1 years ago

    Some minor issues detected. Sometimes bomb will just fall through the ground and doesn't explode. The interceptor sometimes causes glitch that blows the bomb mid-air. That's it.

  • Need help with prop thingy 4.1 years ago

    @jamesPLANESii Oh ok then. Thank you for the help :)

  • Project AURORA- UAV Attack System 4.2 years ago

    @macca431 I don't mind it actually. It's not mine tho :)

  • -blank- 4.2 years ago

    @Awsomur np

  • Eiro IA1-01 4.2 years ago

    Nice :D

  • HEY GUYS IM SO NEW IF YOU UPVOTE MY STUFF I WILL PROMISE YOOU THOSE GORLS 4.2 years ago

    @Sixs3ven I don't understand even a letter in that sentence.

  • HEY GUYS IM SO NEW IF YOU UPVOTE MY STUFF I WILL PROMISE YOOU THOSE GORLS 4.2 years ago

    @Sixs3ven understandable! Have a nice day

    +1
  • Eremita class Light Corvette 4.2 years ago

    Looks very adorable. Make me think twice before bombing it :D

  • Boeing 777 Cockpit 4.2 years ago

    @PilotRoazille Yes sir

    +1
  • Boeing 777 Cockpit 4.2 years ago

    @PilotRoazille Somewhere 2 o'clock it'll be posted :)

    +1
  • Boeing 777 Cockpit 4.2 years ago

    @PilotRoazille Oh.

    +1
  • Boeing 777 Cockpit 4.2 years ago

    @PilotRoazille Where is your region? Asia, Europe or where?

    +1
  • Boeing 777 Cockpit 4.2 years ago

    @PilotRoazille Hello and woww

    +1
  • Basic Cockpit(Worst cockpit in the whole world) 4.2 years ago

    @PilotRoazille np

    +1
  • Basic Cockpit(Worst cockpit in the whole world) 4.2 years ago

    @PilotRoazille It'll done soon

    +1
  • Basic Cockpit(Worst cockpit in the whole world) 4.2 years ago

    @PilotRoazille Panel on the radome left.

    +1
  • Dornier Do 335 (Pfeil) 4.2 years ago

    @KnightOfRen ahh.... Thnx mate :D

  • F/A-18C"Teaser" 4.2 years ago

    T+T=Tea

    +1
  • Dornier Do 335 (Pfeil) 4.2 years ago

    @KnightOfRen The real plane is HUGE . Do you refer to any blueprint(s) or just build it with memory ?.