@MrSilverWolf agree,but its like a video site like TikTok or Youtube:firstly no one records for likes,but when a video that is far worse than yours got more likes and more attention than yours although you believe you've spent 10 times of spirit than that video spent and things like that happens repeatingly and nobody can response to or even cant see your effort,you'll get bored and quit.Isnt this must be avoided?
btw sry for the wasting of the time :P
@SonsoftheMoth Now seems he was afraid and deleted the video.thx for ur support again
（btw u can also sign up an account there,i remembered they also have versions of other languages and many creators in SP:）
I think the reason why im here arguing is because i want to force myself and persue othes to think about the true meaning of sharing and ups and the reason why we're chasing it,not for the work itself
I think the plane is far more than good as a first plane,it reminds me of my first plane.idk how to work with fuselage block these days and built a pipe with wingsXD
hope the next 5,000(even more) comes from techniques instead of kindness,which will be more convincing:)
@MrSilverWolf 737 said what i meant.recommandation and attention is more important than simply miningless points,and it is upvotes that truly decides recommandation,not downloads.
@MrSilverWolf i cmply understand the importance of a friendly atomsphere for a community and the friendship between players,but since the credits often means how well-regarded the work of a player who has spent a lot of spirit into the work is, isnt that seems pretty unfair?
if u have downloaded the plane,u may find
the mounts is disconnected.u can choose ur mounts on you own own by using rotation tool to adjust them on y-axis for 1 unit and add connection.
(pin me thx
@SonsoftheMoth so it's time to deal with the thief.Thx for ur support.
btw the video is here
https://b23.tv/MRhnXZy
(in the title he wants to show he finished the plane by himself and another user but we don't think so after we saw your work.)
@xNotDumb : more serious about the position our works can be put rather than the points themselves,maybe my not so good English leads to misunderstanding :P
@lewishasnoiq How about the limitation of these types of Aircrafts?Which one should I follow,the one for Attack planes or the one for fighters,or mixed？
@MrSilverWolf agree,but its like a video site like TikTok or Youtube:firstly no one records for likes,but when a video that is far worse than yours got more likes and more attention than yours although you believe you've spent 10 times of spirit than that video spent and things like that happens repeatingly and nobody can response to or even cant see your effort,you'll get bored and quit.Isnt this must be avoided?
+2btw sry for the wasting of the time :P
lol that's fit
+2so let's make this come alive lol
+2came to see the work that gets the highest ups ever(up to Feb 06 2023):D
+2@SonsoftheMoth Now seems he was afraid and deleted the video.thx for ur support again
+2（btw u can also sign up an account there,i remembered they also have versions of other languages and many creators in SP:）
hey bud,do you have bilibili(a Chinese video website) account?I saw a video of a plane which is similar with your work there ( bad English:P
+2a drifting bus XD
+1I think the reason why im here arguing is because i want to force myself and persue othes to think about the true meaning of sharing and ups and the reason why we're chasing it,not for the work itself
+1I think the plane is far more than good as a first plane,it reminds me of my first plane.idk how to work with fuselage block these days and built a pipe with wingsXD
hope the next 5,000(even more) comes from techniques instead of kindness,which will be more convincing:)
@MrSilverWolf 737 said what i meant.recommandation and attention is more important than simply miningless points,and it is upvotes that truly decides recommandation,not downloads.
+1@MrSilverWolf maybe the only problem is about recommanding for them...
+1@MrSilverWolf but what's the meaning of the sharing then
+1@MrSilverWolf i cmply understand the importance of a friendly atomsphere for a community and the friendship between players,but since the credits often means how well-regarded the work of a player who has spent a lot of spirit into the work is, isnt that seems pretty unfair?
+1Will you also maintain the existance of the physics system in SP1?Since some of the planes in SP1 can only work in that physical systems
+1巨佬
+1A 3D Radar？seems really cool
+1if u have downloaded the plane,u may find
+1the mounts is disconnected.u can choose ur mounts on you own own by using rotation tool to adjust them on y-axis for 1 unit and add connection.
(pin me thx
@SonsoftheMoth so it's time to deal with the thief.Thx for ur support.
+1btw the video is here
https://b23.tv/MRhnXZy
(in the title he wants to show he finished the plane by himself and another user but we don't think so after we saw your work.)
太强了必须砍(不是
+1@FluffyWaffle45and @FluffyWaffle45 maybe I should try to take off from USS Beast or Ice Base
+1@firstplus then I tried to land and succeedXD
+1I got out from the way and got into the sky of Sky Park City because of my poor driving skills,and I drove it flew to the Wright lol
+1@xNotDumb : more serious about the position our works can be put rather than the points themselves,maybe my not so good English leads to misunderstanding :P
@Realturtlecat thx man.I createed it based on a friend's design on paper:)
一机传三代（？
@cx332 好好好
@AshdenpawTG22but what makes me sad is that this is the last version of SimplePlanes…:P it have became history…
a flying saucer?controls weird:P
手机快乐车（
aha
康康
maybr i can take that car for the weird challenge here lol
@MrSilverWolf i just wanted to participate in that challenge:)
@FirstFish83828 see this one :D sry i failed to make be the successor because it takes time and effort:P
can this participate in the competition then?
@FirstFish83828 Can I post more than one successors ?I have more than one ideas that I don't want to abandon anyone of them.
some pictures seems failed to be loaded:P
6
and why i cant edit xml XP
ScreenShot
Can i submit bugs of the website here?
Because of my negligence,the ground angle of the plane is a negative number.I'll try to fix this problem later.
@lewishasnoiq How about the limitation of these types of Aircrafts?Which one should I follow,the one for Attack planes or the one for fighters,or mixed？
@NIGHTFURYDARK 一针见血的
@kuaishoumengyi “不完整的真相比谎言更可怕”
忘了是谁说的了，印象中有这么一句
比之前做的好太多了，up给了
可以试着在交流的时候和善一点，简圈欢迎你！
The jet engine stands for a failed try >_<
And I just found that I can also use prop engines instead on theoryXD
sdl，tql
整了个蓄能炮攻击机型(