Main fan: 480
Fan with leading edge strips: 730
entire fan and compressor assembly: 1430
Entire airplane so far: 1650
(And I still haven't done the high pressure and low pressure turbines yet)
very good visual model
(Most important) good flight maneuverability
good to see the landing gear behaving close to realistically (retraction/extension)
takeoff/landing speeds are good
Top speed and flight dynamic in cruise are good.
Proper range is very important, too many planes can only fly for 1 hour or 30 mins in this game.
Cons:
(Most Important) the airplane uses only 5,000 feet of runway at MTOW, it needs 11,800
weak brakes
landing gear retracts on ground
no registration or detail towards the rear of the fuselage (rear doors?)
tail wheel isn't quite realistic
airplane takes off in 3,000 feet
square engines would create a lot of drag (just needs a duct from the intake to the round engine fan)
rudder hinge fairings (look closely at right and left side)
technical thing: the landing gear couldn't be lowered with the visor fully up.
Final verdict:
This is a great airplane and concept, you did a good job with the visual model but there were a few parts missed with the systems and the smaller details. It's definitely your best Concorde to date, but it would have been nice to see the same paneling method as the A321 (with real windows, etc)
Looks pretty good but the nose and S-duct/tail do need some improvement.
Btw the engine blades for #2 can't be seen, the engine is at the end of the S-duct.
@YourAverageAviator doesn't sound too hard, just needs some missile effects that trail off the wings a bit. It would be great if we could change the parameters for it as well (activation G loading, but an FT input would be even better).
@SodiumIodide I can run 6,000 parts without lag, on an overclocked 9700K and a basic 1660. Yes, I bought a CPU that costs more than my GPU. Your CPU really dictates how many parts you can run smoothly, SP almost doesn't care about GPU. Keep in mind though, that the more single-core performance your CPU has, the better (not overall performance since SP only uses 1 core IIRC)
@WNP78 Sorry if I'm a bother, but did you guys consider the custom outputs and inputs for the switches/levers/etc? It would really make the cockpits more customizable.
A simple yes or no is cool.
(Thanks for all the hard work that you guys did, there's so much more than just VR coming and I'm so excited for it!)
@e_soup Exactly, any time I spend now on paneling and stuff like that is basically using extra time for a lower quality product than if I were to wait.
@CRJ900Pilot Thank you so much! I also plan to make the 767-300F after this as a mobile version, and maybe a passenger version of that too. I'm expecting 2000-3000 for these, with the lowest possible ones having no interior and low details on the wings. But It'll still look good.
@SodiumIodide Do you mean the airfoil? If so, I did it to "save parts". It's why the airfoil really only has 6 planes.
@TatsuTheOtaku Thanks!
@KnightOfRen well technically 3400 for wings, the interior is 5200, nose is 3,000, rest of fuselage is 2,000, and I still haven't made the main panel.
Updates:
Added front fan stators
Main fan: 480
Fan with leading edge strips: 730
entire fan and compressor assembly: 1430
Entire airplane so far: 1650
(And I still haven't done the high pressure and low pressure turbines yet)
@elevatormann Airliners are from real life but ok (I'm pretty sure he's shooting for realism)
@WiniMii it works fine, you need to control altitude yourself
@se34ruy it works perfectly fine wth
Pros:
very good visual model
(Most important) good flight maneuverability
good to see the landing gear behaving close to realistically (retraction/extension)
takeoff/landing speeds are good
Top speed and flight dynamic in cruise are good.
Proper range is very important, too many planes can only fly for 1 hour or 30 mins in this game.
Cons:
(Most Important) the airplane uses only 5,000 feet of runway at MTOW, it needs
11,800weak brakes
landing gear retracts on ground
no registration or detail towards the rear of the fuselage (rear doors?)
tail wheel isn't quite realistic
airplane takes off in 3,000 feet
square engines would create a lot of drag (just needs a duct from the intake to the round engine fan)
rudder hinge fairings (look closely at right and left side)
technical thing: the landing gear couldn't be lowered with the visor fully up.
Final verdict:
This is a great airplane and concept, you did a good job with the visual model but there were a few parts missed with the systems and the smaller details. It's definitely your best Concorde to date, but it would have been nice to see the same paneling method as the A321 (with real windows, etc)
@se34ruy sure
Looks good, gotta test it
@MrZa You could make it a bit better shaped without adding parts, just changing the shape forward of the cockpit windows.
@se34ruy if you have to go into it go ahead
The plane passed 15000 recently @Gundamboy
@PapaKernels that moment when the harrier isn't in the build :(
Looks pretty good but the nose and S-duct/tail do need some improvement.
Btw the engine blades for #2 can't be seen, the engine is at the end of the S-duct.
Nose could be shaped a bit better but it's good, check mine out if you need
@YourAverageAviator doesn't sound too hard, just needs some missile effects that trail off the wings a bit. It would be great if we could change the parameters for it as well (activation G loading, but an FT input would be even better).
@AirbusAndBoeing150 Sure, just credit. I have better version tho, Here it is.
@abollogames 大声笑它可能更少
@BaconEggs why the nose so pointy
@SodiumIodide I can run 6,000 parts without lag, on an overclocked 9700K and a basic 1660. Yes, I bought a CPU that costs more than my GPU. Your CPU really dictates how many parts you can run smoothly, SP almost doesn't care about GPU. Keep in mind though, that the more single-core performance your CPU has, the better (not overall performance since SP only uses 1 core IIRC)
@BaconEggs I'll be waiting for you to restart airliner production when this update comes out.
@WNP78 Sorry if I'm a bother, but did you guys consider the custom outputs and inputs for the switches/levers/etc? It would really make the cockpits more customizable.
A simple yes or no is cool.
(Thanks for all the hard work that you guys did, there's so much more than just VR coming and I'm so excited for it!)
@KnightOfRen I love the smooth turnoffs. I would be great to see some more high-speed turnoffs like at international airports.
5300
@jamesPLANESii What are your system specs?
@abollogames 该飞机的零件总数约为 20,000 个。
-Google translate again
Hey why is there no gif here
@realSavageMan
is it a B model?
Get ready for a long review.... Coming soon
Weird airplane
@e_soup Exactly, any time I spend now on paneling and stuff like that is basically using extra time for a lower quality product than if I were to wait.
@HTPE Thank you HTPE
@TakeYourLife3000 I could have tested for youuuu
Thanks for 50 upvotes everyone! It means a lot to me.
@Kennneth That would be cool but I'm more into flying. Glad you like it!
@MAHADI Thank you very much.
@CRJ900Pilot Thank you so much! I also plan to make the 767-300F after this as a mobile version, and maybe a passenger version of that too. I'm expecting 2000-3000 for these, with the lowest possible ones having no interior and low details on the wings. But It'll still look good.
Yoo this is awesome, only thing is that there's no United 757s around with the PW engines so you'd have to make the RB's.
@Guangle
不幸的是，由于所有的连接，我需要花费很多时间来复制它。随意复制它并自己编辑连接。
-Google Translate
@KnightOfRen Thank you for your support! My goal is actually to have the best airliner on the whole website.
@Dann810 Thank you MD-11 Man
@Z3chi0 Thank you! Finished build coming out late 2021/early 2022
@SodiumIodide Do you mean the airfoil? If so, I did it to "save parts". It's why the airfoil really only has 6 planes.
@TatsuTheOtaku Thanks!
@KnightOfRen well technically 3400 for wings, the interior is 5200, nose is 3,000, rest of fuselage is 2,000, and I still haven't made the main panel.
@Augusta Fanta haha
@hjonk Thank you for your interest lol
@realSavageMan
@CRJ900Pilot
@Kennneth
@Kennneth yeah
Very nice, check out my 747 designs if you want to see something that took me months.
@hjonk more like thousands
Finally yes!!!!
@se34ruy what do you mean??? Let me check it out. This better work.