@JohnnyBoythePilot I think that the 757 and the 797 could and should operate alongside the A321 in every airline who has shown interest on the planes mentioned.
@DerekSP I personally think that the 797 will replace the 757 and, if it has a high enough capacity version, maybe even the 767. As you said, the A321 has already a very respectable range , but, if a low fares airline (e.g.: EasyJet) wanted to fly a huge route (e.g.: Singapore to New York - Singapor Airlines Route operated by the A350-900 ULR) on a plane the size of an A321, it might need a new plane. To deliver an astronomical range - similar to the A350 - it might need the updates Airbus fited the A350-900, A350-1000 and A350-900 ULR, like composite materials on the wings and fuselage, allowing for a more complex but streamlined shape. The current sharklets on the A321neo would need to be replaced by something like an A330neo's winglet. Returning to the 797, it would fit the middle-of-the-market airliner spot just as well as the 757 if it can be used as an ETOPS Plane. I believe that the 797 will mix the 737 Max, 757, 777x, 787 and a few technologies from the A330neo and A350. I also believe that the 797 will have a wing bend like a 787, but will sport split winglets like a 737 Max. It's cabin will mix a 787's with the A350's. The construction will be similar to the 777x and A350. In proportion to the wings, the engine will appear to be, approximately, the same as the 787. Talking about the A322 you mentioned, it won't be happening, because the A330neo can fit that spot. I can see that you know what you're talking about.
That is a Lockheed Martin L-1011 TriStar's S-Duct. It is very hard to build because of the inlet's geometry. But Sauce made the world's most detailed F-16 with nice CURVES so he can probably make this.
I tried fixing it, but your Zero is inherently unstable - due to the stacked wings. If, in any way, you can use only one wing and use other things to make the twin-toned design.
@Spacedoge12345plane I've downloaded a scenery/designer mod. Then, if you're in Windows, search for the folder "Users". Select the folder with your Windows username, then open "AppData". There you find a folder, "LocalLow". Open it. In there, click the subfolder "Jundroo", then "SimplePlanes", then "Mods". You insert the mod there. It's probably a file with the ".spmod" designation.
Clean design, simple shape, AI and Mobile friendy. Checks all the boxes for a nice "Simple" Plane!
@JohnnyBoythePilot Boeing fanboy much?
@JohnnyBoythePilot I think that the 757 and the 797 could and should operate alongside the A321 in every airline who has shown interest on the planes mentioned.
Oh.
@DerekSP Ah ok! The server is online everyday from approx. 10:00 AM to Midnight (GMT +0:00)
I downloaded this plane, hopped on Google and started adding detail. I will publish a more detailed, AI Friendly version soon.
+1@DerekSP It could be... but it could give us an option to use VTOL/Trim and AGs
I NEED THEM! We can make blimps with those!
+1@DerekSP I personally think that the 797 will replace the 757 and, if it has a high enough capacity version, maybe even the 767. As you said, the A321 has already a very respectable range , but, if a low fares airline (e.g.: EasyJet) wanted to fly a huge route (e.g.: Singapore to New York - Singapor Airlines Route operated by the A350-900 ULR) on a plane the size of an A321, it might need a new plane. To deliver an astronomical range - similar to the A350 - it might need the updates Airbus fited the A350-900, A350-1000 and A350-900 ULR, like composite materials on the wings and fuselage, allowing for a more complex but streamlined shape. The current sharklets on the A321neo would need to be replaced by something like an A330neo's winglet. Returning to the 797, it would fit the middle-of-the-market airliner spot just as well as the 757 if it can be used as an ETOPS Plane. I believe that the 797 will mix the 737 Max, 757, 777x, 787 and a few technologies from the A330neo and A350. I also believe that the 797 will have a wing bend like a 787, but will sport split winglets like a 737 Max. It's cabin will mix a 787's with the A350's. The construction will be similar to the 777x and A350. In proportion to the wings, the engine will appear to be, approximately, the same as the 787. Talking about the A322 you mentioned, it won't be happening, because the A330neo can fit that spot. I can see that you know what you're talking about.
+1@ThePilotDude I'll try, but I'm not very good with replicas.
That is a Lockheed Martin L-1011 TriStar's S-Duct. It is very hard to build because of the inlet's geometry. But Sauce made the world's most detailed F-16 with nice CURVES so he can probably make this.
+1@PPLLAANNEE That's correct. Claps
@PPLLAANNEE Nice! You shaved off 1 second!
@robloxweponco It was made to NOT use wings.
@AnyLabs It's not for the tournament. It is purely a civillian aircraft.
If anyone downloads this plane, make sure you move the guns to Z=3. If not, the propeller will get stuck on them.
@asteroidbook345 Agreed
@AdlerSteiner Ah, ok.
@Hooded Thanks!
I tried fixing it, but your Zero is inherently unstable - due to the stacked wings. If, in any way, you can use only one wing and use other things to make the twin-toned design.
@logizAircrafts Because the refueling booom interacted with the rear gear. IDK how.
@QingyuZhou Yeah. I tried using yours but it went south.
@Spacedoge12345plane I've downloaded a scenery/designer mod. Then, if you're in Windows, search for the folder "Users". Select the folder with your Windows username, then open "AppData". There you find a folder, "LocalLow". Open it. In there, click the subfolder "Jundroo", then "SimplePlanes", then "Mods". You insert the mod there. It's probably a file with the ".spmod" designation.
@TheStarTrekGuy Be my guest!
@TheStarTrekGuy It does hit supersonic very easily. It's rough to handle.
@Minnererg Thanks!
@spefyjerbf Thanks! I'll work on detailing it!
@Battybatbat7 Ok. I'm actually in your time zone - but I'm in summer vacation.
@Battybatbat7 I really enjoy your gray X1-B. Have you tried to build an X-5 or X-15?
@Battybatbat7 Thanks! If you have good planes I'll let you know!
@PaulJohnLozada Then how is it?
@PaulJohnLozada In wich way is it modular? Armament? If yes, it's not valid.
@PaulJohnLozada Is it modular and/or a sucessor?
The 1st Place gets 15 Upvotes
The 2nd Place gets 10 Upvotes
The 3rd Place gets 5 Upvotes
The winner is announced in July 31st. Good building!
@PaulJohnLozada How is it fitting to the challenge?
@Sgtk Thanks! Have you checked out my custom engines?
@Sgtk I know. And this airplane isn't for the challenge. It's just based on my submission for the challenge.
._.
If it says that it was based on a regional aircraft challenge, that is because it is based on the Starcruiser Regional Aircraft series
@Sgtk Ok. Thanks!
:)
@CRJ900Pilot Ok, thanks for the very positive but constructive comment!
Can it fly?
@Sonicandknuckles Your TU-134 is very good. I wonder if you could build a good, lagless, SU-30.
@Sonicandknuckles Thanks!
@Speedhunter I don't know how. Sorry.
@QingyuZhou You did. Sorry for nota mentioning.
@Hooded Ok, I'll do it right away!
Sorry for the non-realism.
@Hooded As I said, I tried!
@Hooded Oh..
@Davisplanez That means it's good? Either way, thanks for commenting!
@Hooded But that makes it realistic ( i think ) ._.