44.1k ollielebanania Comments

  • CHERNO ALPHA (Pacific rim) 3.6 years ago

    @THEYE nope he can't, because I'll be the best ;)) just joking

    +1
  • Bell XP-77 (Model 32) 3.6 years ago

    Great build mate. And don't listen to those guys saying it's not low part count, real part efficiency isn't making a ugly 20 parts plane, it's to make a plane good looking using the right techniques to make it as low as possible and damn 340 parts for a plane looking like this, YEAH THIS IS SOME LOW PART BUILD SHIT.

    +1
  • Bell XP-77 (Model 32) 3.6 years ago

    @PapaKernels it is low part, even more it has a good part efficiency. the plane looks really good for 340 parts so yes it's low part.

    +1
  • It's time 3.6 years ago

    @WarHawk95 destruction : 100

    +1
  • Blohm und Voss 216-B1 3.6 years ago

    I only take screenshots for good looking builds, and I love this german thing !

    +1
  • Dassault Mirage III C 3.6 years ago

    @CaRb0Nb01 you know what, me too

    +1
  • JE SUIS FRANCAIS 3.6 years ago

    @Simpleuser04 I'm not quit sure

    +1
  • Dassault Mirage III C 3.6 years ago

    @Ninjakolabeyt t'es vraiment français ? parce que ton écriture par en couille.

    +1
  • **Mirage IIIC is here !!** 3.6 years ago

    @CharlesDeGaulle merci ! Il devrait sortir dans pas longtemps et avec plein de features !

    +1
  • Supermarine Scimitar F.1 Trailer : "The new bird" 3.6 years ago

    @RicardoAs1515 yes I do https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC9OY46QHgft8LS9ppLfD1wA

    +1
  • Supermarine Scimitar F.1 Trailer : "The new bird" 3.6 years ago

    @RicardoAs1515 oops

    +1
  • Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-31 Foxhound Simplified 3.6 years ago

    @pandum1945 oh well thanks, if you want any help with your builds you can always ask me

    +1
  • Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-31 Foxhound Simplified 3.6 years ago

    very nice build for a bronze player ! I made one too if you want check how I manage it to fly

    +1
  • F-22UL 3.6 years ago

    @Mon0009 this game isn't about simpleplanes anymore, it's about knowing how to do difficult things in a simple way :))

    +1
  • F-22UL 3.6 years ago

    @Mon0009 you sound like a fan lol. No with what I've seen so far he isn't good, this plane don't even have any control surfaces, IT'S A PLANE DO AT LEAST SOME CONTROL SURFACES. This is what I call lazyness because it isn't hard at all, nad with almost 50k point and the platinium rank he should at least know how to do this, but no he just spams simple planes made with lazyness and all the kids who don't know what difficult is or not think he's very good.

    +1
  • Beechcraft King Air 350 ALSR 3.6 years ago

    this is for sure of of the build of the tournament

    +1
  • Simpleplanes Users 3.6 years ago

    I'm so offended

    +1
  • Mikoyan-Gourevitch MiG-31 Foxhound 3.7 years ago

    @gamepro9000 it's ok

    +1
  • French Air Force Flag 3.8 years ago

    @TFK001 popular ? Poor man you really think that 10 upvotes on a stupid joke make it popular. Even if it is the only post for "other".

    +1
  • Girls: boys can't feel pain 3.8 years ago

    it's because you can't scale only one number in the exaust scale, if you put something at 0.3 everything have to be at 0.3

    +1
  • **what's wrong with a lot of builds.** 3.8 years ago

    @SodiumIodide well your Zero is more like a piece of art, I would never fly it again but it's a true master piece

    +1
  • CONVAIR XB-46 3.8 years ago

    @Simps ok this isn't right, I don't know how you do it but upvotes aren't something you can give or promise like that, et Ninja sympa ton avion :) on voit l'évolution

    +1
  • IAI Kfir C.2 3.8 years ago

    I'm not quit sure that you can ask for upvotes even is this way.

    Landinggear is kinda broken.
    Also there's a lot of auto roll and the general shape isn't the one of a Kfir, the plane flys bad and I think that the canards shouldn't move (just like the ones on the Mirage 2000).

    +1
  • The SimplePlanes Mafia (Advertisement) 3.9 years ago

    hello I'm a mod there and I don't even know why but I'm beautiful

    +1
  • SU-27 3.9 years ago

    the plane would be a good build if it had less parts, I don't care about a 1200+ parts build but only when the build is flaw less (at least in it's shape), also I don't understand the part count with the low poly cockpit (which isn't a bad thing in itself even if it doesn't really work). You could work on the flight model, the plane take to much Gs and acceleration is too fast.

    +1
  • Supermarine Spitfire (Cinematic) 3.9 years ago

    @UltraLight only on the first versions tho

    +1
  • Mirage IIIC 1 3.9 years ago

    @KangaKangaTheRedNosedRoo true.

    +1
  • Mirage IIIC 1 3.9 years ago

    @KangaKangaTheRedNosedRoo Well yeah the comment section is here so users can comment the plane, maybe it seems rude from your point of view but for us it's just normal, we also have people that only point out issues on our builds and thanks to this our next builds will not have those issues :)

    +1
  • Mirage IIIC 1 3.9 years ago

    @KangaKangaTheRedNosedRoo french reviews ? Wasn't I the only french guy to review the plane ? Also being critical isn't a bad thing, if I take the time to make a review it's because I want to help him, give some advices. Also I'm not more "critical all the sudden", it's just that I know this plane more than others so of course I have more things to say. And yeah it's a game, but stop with this excuse, if you want to make a replica you make a replica, otherways you make a fictional version ( which is cool too ).

    +1
  • Mirage IIIC 1 3.9 years ago

    Me, a french guy, is very offended by this mirage that can do a cobra, and why the hell do the build have spics and micro stabs at the rear ???

    +1
  • XF-11 3.9 years ago

    Jundroo : makes a game where people will be able to share builds
    HappyFeetWhyshouldi : ok let's make a 4000 parts plane

    ok so let's be serious two minutes, the build is awesome, it does look like the real plane, details are unbelievable just as the custom landing gears, spoilers, control surfaces ect....This build is for sure really REALLY good. BUT there are some flaws : first the part count (yes some people will say "blablabla it's not that bad" but it is !) I know there is a lot of details and custom parts but absolutely NO PART ECONOMY ! Which is a shame for a plane with this ammount of details, for exemple in your jauges each line is ONE part, but you can make two and up to four lines with one part...Also the tail doesn't really look like how it should where the fuselage and the vertical stabilizer meet which is unfortunate for a build of this quality. (And I'm going to say it again, so much parts is great to show what you can do, it's like a piece of art, but high part count doesn't mean good build)
    However don't think that I find your build bad, it's magnificent ! Better than a lot of builds :))

    +1
  • Focke-Wulf Ta 152 H-1 3.9 years ago

    @Urocyon the exact same that make the inside view shift around

    +1
  • Gontar UrbanGo Dune 3.9 years ago

    @Gontar no problem, it's smexy

    +1
  • Focke-Wulf Ta 152 H-1 3.9 years ago

    @Invalidar that's weird, just switch between all the views

    +1
  • Focke-Wulf Ta 152 H-1 3.9 years ago

    @Eventotaku nah it's not perfect at all but thanks :))

    +1
  • Focke-Wulf Ta 152 H-1 3.9 years ago

    @Bernkastel Almost too hot o_O

    +1
  • Focke-Wulf Ta 152 H-1 3.9 years ago

    @Ergi yes O_O

    +1
  • Focke-Wulf Ta 152 H-1 3.9 years ago

    @Astro12 @Eventotaku

    +1
  • LTV A-7E Corsair II RTN 3.9 years ago

    Hey these gloom and DOF settings looks nice ;), and this plane...just wow, great work with this !

    +1
  • Thorne Midge I 3.9 years ago

    @Thorne np ! you deserve more visibilty out here

    +1
  • Darner (Under 10 parts challenge) 3.9 years ago

    @Thorne you made something efficiency but with a very good look, it's not easy to make a build with this part count, you have to be smart :)

    +1
  • Thorne Midge I 3.9 years ago

    man this so coooool, take that spotlight :))

    +1
  • Darner (Under 10 parts challenge) 3.9 years ago

    genius

    +1
  • Warriors|Simpleplanes Cinematic 3.9 years ago

    best moment = 2:45. It's just so good to see missile from far away

    +1
  • Custom Prop Head Designs! 4.0 years ago

    @AWESOMENESS360 first I touch both the max speed value and the max input, that's why in my rotator the max speed is "50" (in overload) but the max input is "15" which allows the rotator to spin way faster. And if you want to make an anti-torque you have to put a rotator somewhere hiden in the plane (the rotator must have at least one thing attached to its spinning side) turning in the opposite way of the first one. Then when you did this you have to ajust the max input in the second rotator to make spin faster or less faster so it will make the same torque as the first one but in the opposite way what will make an anti-torque. (If you didn't understand don't be embarrassed about asking, I know my english is shit)

    +1
  • "CONTENT OF THE MONTH" - A NEW HOPE ?! 4.0 years ago

    @Bernkastel oh well that will make a lot of planes to share

    +1
  • Spiral Nose ! 4.0 years ago

    @PolyIsGone well actually making a anti-torque was possible with only two parts, and the spiral is made with like not more than 5 parts :)

    +1
  • Spiral Nose ! 4.0 years ago

    @PolyIsGone to avoid the violent rotation that the hinge rotator makes at high speeds you have to make an anti-torque, actually I cloned this rotating nose and put it somewhere in the plane rotating in the other direction, so they both cancel the torque made by the other one.

    +1
  • MIG 28 ( Northrop F-5E ) 4.1 years ago

    Damn this is good

    +1
  • SB-28 Strategic Bomber 4.1 years ago

    this is so underrated

    +1