I invite you to join me as I change out my keycaps.
\ \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\1111111111111111111111qqqqqqqqq\qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwqwqwqeerqweweweqwe2222222222222222222222222222222eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee23333333333333333333333333333333333333333444444444444444444444444444444444aqaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaswsssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssdeddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzxxxxxxxxxxxxx n5t cdcccccccccccccccccccccvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvbbbbvvvvvvvvvvbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbfrffffffffffffffffffrrfrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr55555555555555555555555555555555 ttttttt66gtggggggggggggggggggggggg6566666666666666666666666yyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyhyhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhyyyyyyyyyyyyyynnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn7 7 777777777777777777777777777777777777777mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu 888888888888888888888888888888888888899999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiikkikkikkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,00000000000-oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooll lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll.........................................'////////////////////////[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]\\\\\\\ 8\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ '' ''''''''''''''''\\\'''''///////////////////////////*****----------------------------777777777777777777777777778/88888888888999999999999999999999999999999999994744444444444444444444585555555555555693666666666666666666666666666141111111111111111222222222222222222223663333333333333330000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000.3.................. +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ That is all. Thank you for joining me.
Looks nice. Next time the thumbnail should focus more on the aircraft itself, as this thumbnail doesn't really show the design off as well as it could. Hopefully a spotlight can offset this issue :)
Nah. Nothing to cry about lmao. If you are in a relationship, then you have fun with your SO. If you are single, then you don’t have to deal with that hassle - treat yourself!
I have found that extra info is actually appreciated, as long as you leave it as a link to a separate forum post. A few of my followers (more than I expect) actually take the time to read my long stuff, which is quite nice. Though my long-form content, when it gets more technical, is really just for me to build up my little portfolio that I have made here :)
.
To be fair, a pasted Wikipedia entry doesn’t really add much. I suppose my long descriptions are different in that they essentially say “hey, I can do math!”.
Gangland by Lecrae has to be one of my favorites. It is a really well-done song with a beat like no other, and it also conveys a detailed historical perspective with a dash of pointed political rhetoric.
.
I’ve also been listening to some Rammstein lately too.
Sure! So essentially what that term does is that it sets the smooth rate according to whether AG1 is true or false. If ag1 is true, then the smooth rate is 10^10, which results in the function moving instantaneously. When ag1 is false, the function recedes according to the rate that you gave me :)
So a delay to deactivation? Definitely possible, though I lost the code. Shouldn’t be too hard to remember though. Let’s try this:
. ceil(smooth(clamp01(Activate1), Activate1 ? pow(10,10) : 1/10))
.
Lemme know if this works or not. It’s been a while since I worked with this kind of delay
Jundroo is legally required to do this (USA law). Same reason why gmail doesn’t allow account creation if you disclose a younger-than-13 age. Those who are too young should just not disclose their age tbh
A good build with proper crediting practices is always ok. In fact, I quite like it when others use my systems to make cool stuff of their own. Great work!
@Jerba It is, but it would require a complete redesign of the system. This specific flight system uses a different logical structure than what you are describing
@Chancey21 Ty! Unfortunately that delay is quite difficult to effectively get around, as all user inputs (pitch, roll, yaw) take a little time to reach their desired value. It seems like SP has them automatically smoothed.
@AsteroidAsteroidTheBook Unfortunately having some simple landing skids was my only option, as a retractable option would blow up when using the spaceworthy engines.
Ty though!
@ThomasRoderick Yeah, the code is definitely long. I started with a simple case for user input, then added an angular speed control, that combined with the sensitivity control. After a few extra debug cases, I added a few bandaids that made the code quite lengthy. While lengthy, I personally like my method as it lets me determine pitch/roll/yaw rates directly within my code. Of course I know more now, so a future iteration would be less spaghetti-like, so ty for the feedback!
I’m sure you understand the pain that comes with balancing thrust, especially without any lifting surfaces. Ultimately this was the best I could get! Ty for the feedback tho
@ThomasRoderick Probably it would be a social democracy (think the Nordic model), or at most a tame form of market socialism. My intention was not for the Worker’s Republic to be authoritarian, as that story is old and overdone by now. That, and I’m personally not a fan of authoritarianism lol, though I am certainly in favor of properly implemented social spending!
Not sure. Though I know it has a 7 somewhere in it. I suppose make your nudge amount 0.25, then use the arrow buttons to decrease it until you see a 7.
I invite you to join me as I change out my keycaps.
+11\ \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\1111111111111111111111qqqqqqqqq\qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwqwqwqeerqweweweqwe2222222222222222222222222222222eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee23333333333333333333333333333333333333333444444444444444444444444444444444aqaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaswsssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssdeddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzxxxxxxxxxxxxx n5t cdcccccccccccccccccccccvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvbbbbvvvvvvvvvvbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbfrffffffffffffffffffrrfrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr55555555555555555555555555555555 ttttttt66gtggggggggggggggggggggggg6566666666666666666666666yyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyhyhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhyyyyyyyyyyyyyynnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn7 7 777777777777777777777777777777777777777mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu 888888888888888888888888888888888888899999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiikkikkikkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,00000000000-oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooll lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll.........................................'////////////////////////[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]\\\\\\\ 8\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ '' ''''''''''''''''\\\'''''///////////////////////////*****----------------------------777777777777777777777777778/88888888888999999999999999999999999999999999994744444444444444444444585555555555555693666666666666666666666666666141111111111111111222222222222222222223663333333333333330000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000.3.................. +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ That is all. Thank you for joining me.
𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑
+7𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑
𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑
𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑
𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑
𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑
𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑
𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑
𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑
𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑
𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑
𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑
𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑𓆑
Vibin
I like the canopy!
Italian. The German one looks ugly imo
What kind of FT code are you using? Seems like a ridiculously long code, though I suppose certain types of displays require a lot of code.
Looks nice. Next time the thumbnail should focus more on the aircraft itself, as this thumbnail doesn't really show the design off as well as it could. Hopefully a spotlight can offset this issue :)
drop smash mains
+2@Alpha6 The AI handles both quite poorly tbh
Yo momma
+7Love the style!
+1Perhaps whatever option is heavy, since this looks like a heavier combat aircraft
+1Nah. Nothing to cry about lmao. If you are in a relationship, then you have fun with your SO. If you are single, then you don’t have to deal with that hassle - treat yourself!
Vibe
I like rockets tbh
+1Hot. Good to see another build from you!
+1I have found that extra info is actually appreciated, as long as you leave it as a link to a separate forum post. A few of my followers (more than I expect) actually take the time to read my long stuff, which is quite nice. Though my long-form content, when it gets more technical, is really just for me to build up my little portfolio that I have made here :)
+4.
To be fair, a pasted Wikipedia entry doesn’t really add much. I suppose my long descriptions are different in that they essentially say “hey, I can do math!”.
Pirated movies
.
.
.
.
.
Jk
Not sure if I can help at this time. Sorry!
+1This comment section passed the vibe check. 100% agree with everyone here
+1Step 2: Cover yourself in oil
+6Gangland by Lecrae has to be one of my favorites. It is a really well-done song with a beat like no other, and it also conveys a detailed historical perspective with a dash of pointed political rhetoric.
.
I’ve also been listening to some Rammstein lately too.
inb4 planes that moan
+4@KnightOfRen Literally nothing lmao. Just ppl manufacturing drama as usual
+1Sp is dying post #284747929273747290376481
+2Do a lot of people actually believe that criticism is hate speech? This sounds like a laughable strawman of someone’s argument.
+2Lmao what? I get that there are grey areas, but not on SP. That rule really just exists so people can't spam slurs and racism around the site.
+9Sure! So essentially what that term does is that it sets the smooth rate according to whether AG1 is true or false. If ag1 is true, then the smooth rate is 10^10, which results in the function moving instantaneously. When ag1 is false, the function recedes according to the rate that you gave me :)
So a delay to deactivation? Definitely possible, though I lost the code. Shouldn’t be too hard to remember though. Let’s try this:
.
ceil(smooth(clamp01(Activate1), Activate1 ? pow(10,10) : 1/10))
.
Lemme know if this works or not. It’s been a while since I worked with this kind of delay
Less than 600 is usually my target for being mobile friendly. Just limit parts so mobile devices don't lag too much
Jundroo is legally required to do this (USA law). Same reason why gmail doesn’t allow account creation if you disclose a younger-than-13 age. Those who are too young should just not disclose their age tbh
@ZFRFRK Nothing planned atm. Probably some subassemblies
@Tums Ty! The nearly-hidden landing skids were my only option for a build like this.
+1A good build with proper crediting practices is always ok. In fact, I quite like it when others use my systems to make cool stuff of their own. Great work!
+2g e o m e t r i c
Deez nutz
@Jerba It is, but it would require a complete redesign of the system. This specific flight system uses a different logical structure than what you are describing
Deez nutz
+4@Chancey21 Ty! Unfortunately that delay is quite difficult to effectively get around, as all user inputs (pitch, roll, yaw) take a little time to reach their desired value. It seems like SP has them automatically smoothed.
+1@AsteroidAsteroidTheBook Unfortunately having some simple landing skids was my only option, as a retractable option would blow up when using the spaceworthy engines.
+2Ty though!
Not sure how I missed this
@ThomasRoderick I made em high-yield by design. Fun factor. But yeah, I think adding a trim gyro would have helped me a lot
+1@ThomasRoderick Yeah, the code is definitely long. I started with a simple case for user input, then added an angular speed control, that combined with the sensitivity control. After a few extra debug cases, I added a few bandaids that made the code quite lengthy. While lengthy, I personally like my method as it lets me determine pitch/roll/yaw rates directly within my code. Of course I know more now, so a future iteration would be less spaghetti-like, so ty for the feedback!
I’m sure you understand the pain that comes with balancing thrust, especially without any lifting surfaces. Ultimately this was the best I could get! Ty for the feedback tho
+1@ThomasRoderick Probably it would be a social democracy (think the Nordic model), or at most a tame form of market socialism. My intention was not for the Worker’s Republic to be authoritarian, as that story is old and overdone by now. That, and I’m personally not a fan of authoritarianism lol, though I am certainly in favor of properly implemented social spending!
+1@UraniumOxide Ty! I tried to pack a lot of functionality in this little plane.
+1@ThomasRoderick Ty! I was going for that sort of vibe, though I play Elite Dangerous instead of Star Citizen. Both look really cool tho
+1Not sure. Though I know it has a 7 somewhere in it. I suppose make your nudge amount 0.25, then use the arrow buttons to decrease it until you see a 7.
@goboygo1 I try to be efficient that way :)
+1@PippyCalibre Ty!
@idk201011323 No problem! If I make a build that requires a turret, then I will include one!
+1