for once a modern hypercar design that actually looks cool. not only cool but definetly something that should be built IRL. CAR COMPANIES! HIRE THAT CREATOR AT ONCE! 10/10
the thought of improving an already good aircraft is there. but design could have been improved. id suggest try to put the air intakes the side of the fuselage instead of infront
not bad. a aircraft of franco-swedish inspiration and a radial engine arent everyday you see such designs. and 8/10 is definetly the rating of the day aswell as slight encouragement of streamlining the wings a little bit.
not a bad design. honestly its rather good. only one complaint is the incredibly short hull but considering its based on late interwar/early ww2 tanks, its really good.
this plane is definitely a nice design. tho the only real critique is the rear end of the fuselages design being rather shoddily done. but overall its a good enough design. 9/10
@Mustang51 well as annoying as it is.... there are those people who probly knows nothing about propulsion. also btw coudl ye help with some landing gears? im working on a twin engine plane and i think it could be good with custom gear
when i look at most of the panzer tanks with the tracks 2 mod i always see the sprocket at the rear. is it not possible to just reverse the drive of the newer tracks 2 mod or do people just dont bother?
@BnanaX wait simpleplanes is family?
@DuceAnchovy hmmmm in that case. then ill leave this little challenge. take the BT-5 frame and build a custom tank of your own design choice.
@DuceAnchovy aye. not american copied suspension here. only stronk stalinium shocks here
no tankers were knocked out during the jump
-USSR officials
is the BT-7 Next? bte nice work. 10/10
simple planes logic. thats how it works
for once a modern hypercar design that actually looks cool. not only cool but definetly something that should be built IRL. CAR COMPANIES! HIRE THAT CREATOR AT ONCE! 10/10
+1the thought of improving an already good aircraft is there. but design could have been improved. id suggest try to put the air intakes the side of the fuselage instead of infront
+1not bad. a aircraft of franco-swedish inspiration and a radial engine arent everyday you see such designs. and 8/10 is definetly the rating of the day aswell as slight encouragement of streamlining the wings a little bit.
+1excellent big jet
looks like a normal plane. if you want it to be italian id recommend lowering the exhaust and make the left wing a bit longer
i say a custom made fighter is what you should go for next @benjamindowning
i think that luck is rather low but meh...
no worries. i think 1500 is silver while 5000 is gold
not a bad simple design. 9/10 now i really need to start making new tanks
crazy amounts of details. 9/10
nice plane but the nose is making the plane look like its a cartoon think drawn up by a kid. despite that its a good plane 7/10
@DuceAnchovy i bet the next years designs are gonna be much better
not a bad design. honestly its rather good. only one complaint is the incredibly short hull but considering its based on late interwar/early ww2 tanks, its really good.
@FlyingHueman i usually dont like jets so yeah its high praise. maybe even extreme but its still praise
this jet is one of the most good looking jets i have ever seen. 10/10
@Nick2007 well.... its to be expected when i try to make a bomber
10/10. no real flaws apart from the placement of the landing gear. still its outright brilliant
+1this plane is definitely a nice design. tho the only real critique is the rear end of the fuselages design being rather shoddily done. but overall its a good enough design. 9/10
very big elevators which kinda makes it look a bit odd. and the rear part of the fuselage. other than that its a good design. keep on improving
+1@Mustang51
@Mustang51 http://www.simpleplanes.com/a/6Kx8j2/Prototype-54-Project
just a moment
@Mustang51 well as annoying as it is.... there are those people who probly knows nothing about propulsion. also btw coudl ye help with some landing gears? im working on a twin engine plane and i think it could be good with custom gear
well its very close to a hurricane. bottom radiator is a bit wrong but overall its rather accurate
@TitanIncorporated because realistically its not really that good?
those are extremely large elevators
creative
+1@Zippy6 probly dont want to make a mess off the tracks?
@afriad0kaz i believe so. but the game i believe came after the movie
hmm
hes bringing in a jet... ~~hmmm maybe make a new fighter?~~
@Mustang51 aye aye.
@Mustang51 looks familiar?
+1https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/5819a8/Prototype-45 for those who wished to fly the original
+1...
+1@afriad0kaz but isnt it a plane based on the anime skycrawlers_
i may use the wings for another project as i really like these wings for some reason
@SimpleBoii only because it already had the name for a discord server.
+1@Mustang51 ok
@Mustang51 odd question. have you ever tried to make planes at the size i make them? if not, give it a try
@Mustang51 landing gears are something im bad at
@Mustang51 already submitted me entry which pretty much is the prototype 40 plane. just gave it the name of Rozta IV
@Mustang51 well this will be fun
@Mustang51 ye gonna enter the competition?
when i look at most of the panzer tanks with the tracks 2 mod i always see the sprocket at the rear. is it not possible to just reverse the drive of the newer tracks 2 mod or do people just dont bother?
+1