10.5k teodor99 Comments

  • Gloster Sea Gladiator 4.9 years ago

    @Falkenwut officially there is 4 guns. 2 in the lower part of the fuselage and 2 on the wings. tho unofficial claims says there was possible with an additional 2 guns on the top wings making it a 6 gun gladiator. tho unofficial i wouldnt be surprised if such field modifications were the case

    +1
  • Gloster Sea Gladiator 4.9 years ago

    a gladiator of the skies. your version of the gladiator is quite a good designs. but if you dont mind me being a bit nit-picky, the wing mounted 7.7 guns were in small pods integrated into the lower wings. even some additional ones on top wins although its only been rumored of 6 gunned gladiators

    i say this gets a 8/10.

    +1
  • CyberVAZ 4.9 years ago

    and no one has done the cybercar

    +1
  • Prototype 42 [Twin Proto] 4.9 years ago

    @Mustang51 https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/42oULm/nexus-gear incase required

    +1
  • EE Nordwind P 4.9 years ago

    @MattEpic mostly because i have me own rules i try to follow. one of them being improved versions of other creations are to be sent to them. therefore its unlisted

    +1
  • 45 Part Bt-5 4.9 years ago

    @BaconAircraft the Pe-8 aint an issue now. now we got the JU 288 to deal with

    +1
  • Guan Yu (Heavy Gatling Tank) 4.9 years ago

    @Stargazzer clearly

    +1
  • 45 Part Bt-5 4.9 years ago

    @DuceAnchovy no im telling the reality of the situation

    +1
  • Guan Yu (Heavy Gatling Tank) 4.9 years ago

    wow..... TOTALLY WICKED! 100/10

    +1
  • Lynix Tharsia Supersport [TS-03] Speciale Performante 4.9 years ago

    for once a modern hypercar design that actually looks cool. not only cool but definetly something that should be built IRL. CAR COMPANIES! HIRE THAT CREATOR AT ONCE! 10/10

    +1
  • EE Nordwind J 4.9 years ago

    the thought of improving an already good aircraft is there. but design could have been improved. id suggest try to put the air intakes the side of the fuselage instead of infront

    +1
  • EE Nordwind P 4.9 years ago

    not bad. a aircraft of franco-swedish inspiration and a radial engine arent everyday you see such designs. and 8/10 is definetly the rating of the day aswell as slight encouragement of streamlining the wings a little bit.

    +1
  • North American P-51B Mustang 4.9 years ago

    10/10. no real flaws apart from the placement of the landing gear. still its outright brilliant

    +1
  • RAA. I 4.9 years ago

    very big elevators which kinda makes it look a bit odd. and the rear part of the fuselage. other than that its a good design. keep on improving

    +1
  • K-C1 "Myrmidon" Light Tank 4.9 years ago

    creative

    +1
  • Planax-203 4.9 years ago

    @Mustang51 looks familiar?

    +1
  • Planax-203 4.9 years ago

    https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/5819a8/Prototype-45 for those who wished to fly the original

    +1
  • Planax-203 4.9 years ago

    ...

    +1
  • Rozta IV [Fighter] 4.9 years ago

    @SimpleBoii only because it already had the name for a discord server.

    +1
  • PzKpfw V Panther Ausf. G 4.9 years ago

    when i look at most of the panzer tanks with the tracks 2 mod i always see the sprocket at the rear. is it not possible to just reverse the drive of the newer tracks 2 mod or do people just dont bother?

    +1
  • B’BURN B.46 “Firebrand” TF Mk.5 (‘45-‘50 NAC) 4.9 years ago

    one of my favorite aircraft. and honestly im angry that blackburn didnt get to make more of these planes

    +1
  • S-6 Bronco 4.9 years ago

    thats the coolest floatplane design i have ever seen! 10/10

    +1
  • Update 1.9 - High Caliber 4.9 years ago

    @BogdanX thanks

    +1
  • Update 1.9 - High Caliber 4.9 years ago

    the update is something but whats really annoying me is indicated airspeed. do anyone know how to switch to true airspeed? cause i think im gonna go insane if the IAS keeps messing with me

    +1
  • B-20A Aerofortress 4.9 years ago

    @Mustang51 its already plenty

    +1
  • Prototype 57 [Version 2] 4.9 years ago

    @emanuelga details can happen, color tho.... youre better off doing it yourself or just accept the colors being what they are

    +1
  • De Havilland DH.103 Hornet 4.9 years ago

    @emanuelga no worries

    +1
  • Mid Air Collision with an Aircraft Carrier! 5.0 years ago

    im not even gonna ask how you managed to collide with an aircraft carrier

    +1
  • Prototype 55 5.0 years ago

    @Mustang51 righto then

    +1
  • DESOLATOR Mk8 VTOL FIXED! 5.0 years ago

    quite amazing! 10/10

    +1
  • Prototype 44 (Stage 2) 5.0 years ago

    @Mustang51 probly further development.. just a probly. maybe a custom gear.... maybe

    +1
  • MiG-21Y 5.0 years ago

    @Mustang51 ill leave and upvote and a 8/10

    +1
  • F154-C YaksserschMigtom-15 5.0 years ago

    its something

    +1
  • MiG-21Y 5.0 years ago

    now i wonder..... would he mig 21 look good with a delta wing design without any elevators infront or behind

    +1
  • Prototype 50 5.0 years ago

    @Mustang51 again landing gear wont be much helpful and im too rubbish with custom gear so youre gonna have to do it. and ive tried paintjobs... and it went badly so the stock unpainted and white will just have to do

    +1
  • Kawasaki Ki-64 (rob) 5.0 years ago

    quite an amazing job making that plane. tho i must admit i almost confused it for a fictional fighter. other than that. 10/10

    +1
  • Handley Page Hastings 5.0 years ago

    @emanuelga no worries

    +1
  • Prototype 39 5.0 years ago

    @TitanIncorporated aye noice plane

    +1
  • Prototype 39 5.0 years ago

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rolls-Royce_Vulture @Mustang51

    +1
  • GCP-ATK Cerberus 5.0 years ago

    blimey thats something you dont see everyday

    +1
  • Prototype 39 5.0 years ago

    X-24 is an aicraft engine which was experimented on during ww2 as an attempt to get more power out of the planes. it wasnt that effective due to the additional weight and production priorities to just improving the V12s and Radial engines @Mustang51

    +1
  • Prototype 34 5.0 years ago

    @Mustang51 its ok. i try to make it simple but nice

    +1
  • Prototype 39 5.0 years ago

    @Mustang51 i havent based this on any irl planes

    +1
  • Protoype 4 5.0 years ago

    @Mustang51 ill try to add more landing gears

    +1
  • Prototype 34 5.0 years ago

    @Mustang51 you can use the super charger

    +1
  • 66.7palm 5.0 years ago

    quite amazing. never seen such aircraft before

    +1
  • D.H.100 Vampire 5.0 years ago

    its a good thing its a jet. otherwise it wouldnt "suck"

    ~~i regret nothing~~

    +1
  • Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-3 5.1 years ago

    quite amazing

    +1
  • Prototype Jonnara-M4 5.1 years ago

    quite amazing

    +1
  • my first boat 5.1 years ago

    and they're a boat to believe it

    +1