too many airbrakes
theoritically, airbrake(or engine,wing, or something else works with air) cannot work in low-pressure flow(on small speed, on upper surface of wing, behind airbrake etc).
Can i use bombs and/or fancy airbrakes on pistons on launcher?
How big speed allowed? What if "plane" detaches at 2^63 m/s?
It must be a glider, so can i use something like cannons tracking glider?
Can i use thin ducts out of wings(if it working in simpleplanes)(irl it can have negative drag)?
Can i use something like that if it works in simpleplanes?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drag_count
The drag coefficient is used to compare the solutions of different geometries by means of a dimensionless number.
A drag count is used as a more user-friendly measurement(bullshit) as the coefficient of drag is usually much less than 1. A drag count of 200 to 400 is typical for an airplane at cruise.
A reduction of one drag count on a subsonic civil transport airplane means about 200 lb (91 kg) more in payload.(not really)
/
@Starbound
v=83(m/s)
p=1.225(kg/m^3)
fd=6000(n)
Dcd=10^4×(2×fd/(p×(v^2)×a))
a=15.6088(m^2)
Dcd=911.00226
fd=0.5×p×(v^2)×cd×a
cd=0.0911002
/
in result:
velocity v=83 m/s
gas density p=1.225 kg/m^3
reference area a=15.6088 m^2
drag points 911.002
coefficient drag cd=0.0911002
drag force fd=6000 n
1.It is not "not finished", it is rather not started.
2.It is not slats. The whole system was supposed to work as a flexible wing, but the result is two abjustable edges, and a flexible top surface that stretches between edges.
So, it have not traditional slats and flaps.
@Mustang51
Nice heli, but
Will there be a possibility of shoot-off propeller in flight?
(with twisted blades autorotation is impossible, and it cannot land in airplane mode because propellers too big.)
Will they close electronics module and propeller shaft when it is flying in helicopter mode?
ACS-59 airliner
T
+1remember, RULES IS FOR IDIOTS
tag me, please.
in this world, I can't even trust myself.
+1Next step - 129 600 guns (one gun per squared degree of surface)!
+5"just a cube" with 24 parts and 8 control surfaces?
+3maybe it is easer to cut wings to fly at high aoa?
too many airbrakes
+4theoritically, airbrake(or engine,wing, or something else works with air) cannot work in low-pressure flow(on small speed, on upper surface of wing, behind airbrake etc).
https://www.f1technical.net/articles/12497 probably no one can build a full copy of f1 car or a concept that fits in rules...
custom catapult from hingle rotator and 7.5m rod. yes, all drag (except platform) is enabled.
if catapults allowed, my record is 22380 ft with 4-part plane.
ok.
this world far from ideal... so i thought xyz 5,50,5 meters is a good variant.
How big launcher can be?
it's nice! 140 mph forwards with -60 alpha gives 280 mph in total, for example.
140 mph in which direction?
idk
Can i use bombs and/or fancy airbrakes on pistons on launcher?
How big speed allowed? What if "plane" detaches at 2^63 m/s?
It must be a glider, so can i use something like cannons tracking glider?
Can i use thin ducts out of wings(if it working in simpleplanes)(irl it can have negative drag)?
Can i use something like that if it works in simpleplanes?
my entry here
i don't know about simpleplanes, but in real life it does. @jamesPLANESii
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drag_count
+4The drag coefficient is used to compare the solutions of different geometries by means of a dimensionless number.
A drag count is used as a more user-friendly measurement(bullshit) as the coefficient of drag is usually much less than 1. A drag count of 200 to 400 is typical for an airplane at cruise.
A reduction of one drag count on a subsonic civil transport airplane means about 200 lb (91 kg) more in payload.(not really)
/
@Starbound
v=83(m/s)
p=1.225(kg/m^3)
fd=6000(n)
Dcd=10^4×(2×fd/(p×(v^2)×a))
a=15.6088(m^2)
Dcd=911.00226
fd=0.5×p×(v^2)×cd×a
cd=0.0911002
/
in result:
velocity v=83 m/s
gas density p=1.225 kg/m^3
reference area a=15.6088 m^2
drag points 911.002
coefficient drag cd=0.0911002
drag force fd=6000 n
+1Suggestions are welcome!Can you make Lavochkin La-9, please?
@MakarnaliMussolini you're not first, and maybe you're not last.
Axis behind hull is very vulnerable.
It is not useless, this system used on all real life guns.
Nice gears!
+11.It is not "not finished", it is rather not started.
2.It is not slats. The whole system was supposed to work as a flexible wing, but the result is two abjustable edges, and a flexible top surface that stretches between edges.
So, it have not traditional slats and flaps.
@Mustang51
Is it possible to put two main engines and one additional engine on the plane, or should all three be main engines?
Yes, it have, but I'm about what it looks like.
Finally, it is possible to make a normally working autopilot.
Glory to the bots, kill all humans.
@randomusername @Tums said i should tag you.
+1Turrets from AMX 13?
Good plane, but one thing:
It have not pilot and life support system, so it don't need long nose.
No inlets!!!(100% thrust not guaranteed)
Weird but true! No gyroscope either stays perfectly level!!(without any third force)
It's ship from future.
+1T
+1seconds ago...
Nice heli, but
Will there be a possibility of shoot-off propeller in flight?
(with twisted blades autorotation is impossible, and it cannot land in airplane mode because propellers too big.)
Will they close electronics module and propeller shaft when it is flying in helicopter mode?
T
+1Turrets and engines in the wing.
0:50 if you pause game you stops, and hothing can destroy you.
It don't stop "force", it just redirect it.
It is crazy.
It can fly through objects?
Before you can come up with something, the idea is already stolen.
Above the description, next to the photo there is a gray button. @PlayPixels1167
kat
t
Ok.
Please add "challenge" tag, on this tag less posts, and bigger chance to observe your post.
Also, if you need to reply just click at button, it on the side of the comment.
Or write @name, example: @EJBoss97
When is the deadline?