Many people are on vacation. I see that during the school times, is when there is more activity. After a long day of school, I like to come home and check the SP website. Plenty of people probably do this. It's time be able to forget about school for a bit.
Great build. The only thing I would say is the leading edge width doesn't look right. I feel you should've goon thinner on the outer edges. The wing's height stays mostly consistent. Keep up the good work.
@BACconcordepilot I believe it does change the colors. I've seen where I've had a subassembly from one build and used it on another and the color changes. It's due to the different custom color schemes.
@AnoniMosu I understand. How about doing something like this You see how the fuselage parts end before the control surfaces. Yet it still like a wing and is better than a flat wing. If you want to do this great, if not it's fine. Do what you want. I'm just trying to help.
@AnoniMosu well then you can continue the fuselage over the wing instead of ending it so soon. Then nudge in the primary wing and you get an actual good looking wing. Plus let me tell you something. Going over 50 parts is no big deal. I have a 4 year old device that can handle at most 450 parts. Adding parts to this will still keep it simple yet looking good.
I'm not much into Japanese ww2 planes but this look great. The only thing is, is the primary wings should be changed into airfoils. Creating actual airfoils makes a design stand out. It will actually look like a plane. Real planes don't have these thin boxy shapes. The have curves to them.
I think I have 10 projects right now. They are mostly updating my old designs.
Big boi
No, this is Patrick.
I don't know if this will work how you want it, but it has your requirements. Part
Many people are on vacation. I see that during the school times, is when there is more activity. After a long day of school, I like to come home and check the SP website. Plenty of people probably do this. It's time be able to forget about school for a bit.
To go boldly where no train has gone before.
The detail on this is insane. Great work. All you need to add is some packages of peanuts.
Great build. The only thing I would say is the leading edge width doesn't look right. I feel you should've goon thinner on the outer edges. The wing's height stays mostly consistent. Keep up the good work.
If you don't have Mrs. Frizzle in the drivers seat, then it ain't worth it.
with some simple changes, you can easily make a P-26. I really love the detail that you have done with the engine.
I really like the potato with sticks. Good job.
You basically nailed it. A really nice cockpit indeed. I really like what you did with the exhaust and landing gear. Keep up the good work.
Does it have my package?
@F104Deathtrap I like that idea.
No. Andrew has said they aren't givimg up on SP. Plus why would they? SP is their most successful game.
@BACconcordepilot I believe it does change the colors. I've seen where I've had a subassembly from one build and used it on another and the color changes. It's due to the different custom color schemes.
A cake.
@Mrjace22 thanks.
@Tankace1 link and other link I've seen both.
@bjac0 WuT
@SuperSix dude I'm so sorry. Will fix that now.
@CRJ900Pilot thanks.
@RailfanEthan extreme overthink.
well if you overthink things like me, this is the actually the oldest plane on Simpleplanes that I could find. @RailfanEthan
@AnelGaming I have the tank at lowest HP. I can't just angle them like the front. I have to angle them on the front to back and left to right.
look up images of real life planes if you want to do replicas, you can find a lot of detail in one image and find cool paint schemes.
Can't wait to see this in action in SP and the real world.
you should rename the video 5 ways to get cancer.
Staring at them real hard will make them go away.
Interesting design.
When I first saw the title, I though you were asking the community which one to build.
I think Andrew will add farm animals to the game.
@RailfanEthan I second your idea.
@dogb23boy I'm a wizard.
Long live France? Whenever they see a weapon, they surrender! Lul.
@InternationalAircraftCompany not quite. The jumbo has a different mantlet.
does it have my package?
Well the shape looks fantastic. I know it was a small build, however I feel there could be more detail added to make it look a little better.
I accidentally did something useful for once.
@RailfanEthan every time somebody asks about the release date, Andrew pushes it back a week.
@AnoniMosu I understand. How about doing something like this You see how the fuselage parts end before the control surfaces. Yet it still like a wing and is better than a flat wing. If you want to do this great, if not it's fine. Do what you want. I'm just trying to help.
@AnoniMosu well then you can continue the fuselage over the wing instead of ending it so soon. Then nudge in the primary wing and you get an actual good looking wing. Plus let me tell you something. Going over 50 parts is no big deal. I have a 4 year old device that can handle at most 450 parts. Adding parts to this will still keep it simple yet looking good.
You could read Andrew's comments on Simpleplanes And Simplerockets2 website to find additional information that wasn't explained in his posts.
I'm currently working on a M4A3 pacific Marines tank. Looking at your tank gave me more inspiration.
I'm not much into Japanese ww2 planes but this look great. The only thing is, is the primary wings should be changed into airfoils. Creating actual airfoils makes a design stand out. It will actually look like a plane. Real planes don't have these thin boxy shapes. The have curves to them.
If people truly cared about you, then they would check your profile. That is a good place to put your status.
What am I gonna do?
@Indecision is it a replica because I've seen planes that look like that?
@RailfanEthan I saw the same thing.
I really love the middle one. Especially the color scheme and details. Keep up the good work.