A long time has past since you posted that comment lol. Interests change and that's what really happened way back 2 years ago. I'm just checking in and tending to a little nostalgia at the moment. I got burnt out completely trying to make accurate replicas that also had a realistic fight model back in 2020 during my height. But I got really discouraged when I found out I pretty much needed to manipulate it using the then-new Funky Trees; ever since then I struggled to fully use it. It frustrated me very much how I needed to go to extreme lengths to get my projects to perform what they possibly would have flown like. The last project I was working on was a remake of the Alekseyev I-216 heavy interceptor with two 76mm NS-76 cannons. Got the fuselage and front guns done and had just the canopy, wings, and landing gear left. I also had massive ambitions to create the sister project of my M-31, the Myasishchev M-32 with a single massive FAB-9000 bomb. I really wanted to fly and work on military prototypes like I was doing here as a real world career. However, I realized that it would most likely be out of the question and I would have to be a civilian pilot instead which has never interested me. I've gone full circle and have ended up back in the same interests I had as a younger kid which happens to be semi trucks and especially farming. There has been a couple times where I've mustered up some confidence to try and pick the game up, but they've been shot down as all my procedures and understanding of the building techniques are 2 years old. It would take a very long time to try and understand something I'm not 100% gung-ho about. I suppose I should try to not forcefully resurrect a past hobby, so I'll probably let this one quietly die out and reflect on the great memories I had and created. @WinsWings
I hope you realize that this airplane is strikingly similar to the Ilyushin TsKB-60; the first one to receive the designation IL-6. I almost wonder if you took inspiration from it!
No. It wasn’t even produced. This airplane did not progress past the scale modeling stage. And no passenger version was even considered as the only purpose in mind was a heavy bomber. @Yosann
Interests change. Been doing a lot of other things and because of this school year, I have had only a couple hours every day to do games. Been thinking of building airplanes again, but it’s hard when you don’t have a lot of time. @Trainzo
I’m doing fair. My interest for the game has fallen, and I’ve taken back to my previous fantasies such as Farming Simulator. I’ve been searching for ways to get back inspiration, but no results have come up sadly. @Trainzo
Its not the fact that its tough to build. This one is almost stupidly easy. Its just personal issues and a lack of interest at the moment.
@AsteroidAsteroidTheBook
For me it’s primarily pilot’s opinions. For example the LaGG-3 I consider a respectable aircraft in terms of firepower, but from pilots’ opinion it is completely useless garbage.
I think I might have one of the hardest jobs here as I only make paper projects/prototypes. Most of the time I have to go to hell and back to get a decent blueprint; not to mention if one still exists.
I find making the flight model very frustrating considering that the stuff I deal with is almost raw design with no prototypes which means probably little wind tunnel testing/design improvements to the design. I just make the wing very close to the real design (like jamesPLANESii) and suck up results. My M-31’s flight behavior frustrated me extensively as the wing shape caused lots of landing problems. But fixing that was almost hopeless cause guess wat, no flight data.
In spite of all the problems I have to face, I still think I do a good job.
I don’t really care about requesting you to build an airplane as I could build it myself in probably better quality. Thanks for your time ;)
@KenworthK100TriAxle
A long time has past since you posted that comment lol. Interests change and that's what really happened way back 2 years ago. I'm just checking in and tending to a little nostalgia at the moment. I got burnt out completely trying to make accurate replicas that also had a realistic fight model back in 2020 during my height. But I got really discouraged when I found out I pretty much needed to manipulate it using the then-new Funky Trees; ever since then I struggled to fully use it. It frustrated me very much how I needed to go to extreme lengths to get my projects to perform what they possibly would have flown like. The last project I was working on was a remake of the Alekseyev I-216 heavy interceptor with two 76mm NS-76 cannons. Got the fuselage and front guns done and had just the canopy, wings, and landing gear left. I also had massive ambitions to create the sister project of my M-31, the Myasishchev M-32 with a single massive FAB-9000 bomb. I really wanted to fly and work on military prototypes like I was doing here as a real world career. However, I realized that it would most likely be out of the question and I would have to be a civilian pilot instead which has never interested me. I've gone full circle and have ended up back in the same interests I had as a younger kid which happens to be semi trucks and especially farming. There has been a couple times where I've mustered up some confidence to try and pick the game up, but they've been shot down as all my procedures and understanding of the building techniques are 2 years old. It would take a very long time to try and understand something I'm not 100% gung-ho about. I suppose I should try to not forcefully resurrect a past hobby, so I'll probably let this one quietly die out and reflect on the great memories I had and created. @WinsWings
+1That’s a very good idea for things like the B-36’s original landing gear of two stupidly thick tires. @Destroyer08
+5I hope you realize that this airplane is strikingly similar to the Ilyushin TsKB-60; the first one to receive the designation IL-6. I almost wonder if you took inspiration from it!
+1No. It wasn’t even produced. This airplane did not progress past the scale modeling stage. And no passenger version was even considered as the only purpose in mind was a heavy bomber. @Yosann
Thank you man!
@Yosann
Interests change. Been doing a lot of other things and because of this school year, I have had only a couple hours every day to do games. Been thinking of building airplanes again, but it’s hard when you don’t have a lot of time. @Trainzo
You are welcome my good friend. @Trainzo
You are welcome!
@Trainzo
I’m doing fair. My interest for the game has fallen, and I’ve taken back to my previous fantasies such as Farming Simulator. I’ve been searching for ways to get back inspiration, but no results have come up sadly. @Trainzo
Hands down, cutest anime I’ve ever watched
+1Np man!
@Grob0s0VBRa
You are welcome.
@Trainzo
You are welcome my friend. Glad you see you made another appearance on the site. @Trainzo
Np man
@NINJ4
T
+1You’re still wet behind the ears
5.6Sukhoi Su-8
You are welcome my friend.
@Trainzo
4332 Parts
iOS
Good gosh!! What kind of supernatural Apple device do you own?!
It’s a naval strike fighter. Could be fitted with bombs or rockets, but was seen most with a torpedo.
+1@TheTwoanie2000
Good to see you are alive my friend! How are you in your world?
@Trainzo
It was just the first thing to come to my mind.
Thank you! Look on my latest forum.
@PANZERDOG
Its not the fact that its tough to build. This one is almost stupidly easy. Its just personal issues and a lack of interest at the moment.
@AsteroidAsteroidTheBook
Sort of. I’m still active on the site, just that I don’t really have input to build :(
@PANZERDOG
This is absolutely beautiful comrade!
Incredible my friend!
For me it’s primarily pilot’s opinions. For example the LaGG-3 I consider a respectable aircraft in terms of firepower, but from pilots’ opinion it is completely useless garbage.
Too mountainous for AI most likely. The 4 hairpin corner section is kinda challenging.
Not to be rude, but all of use have pretty well noticed for round about two months.
@SimpleAirStudios
It’s a blin with fans . . .
Well I guess that completely eliminates all my choices of
- Alekseyev’s fighters (I-212/213/214, I-215, I-216, I-217)
- Lavochkin La-250
- Mikoyan-Gurevich I-320
- Mikoyan-Gurevich I-350
- Sukhoi Su-15 (1949)
- Sukhoi Su-17 (1949)
+2So your on windows, and you don’t follow blueprints?
Eyy it’s no problem mate. Glad you love it! ;D
@Zarya
Just anywhere on the airplane. I recommend on the main fuselage and nudged into it so it cannot be seen.
@Zarya
It is classified as an airplane as it can fly above water.
@Alef2216
I think I might have one of the hardest jobs here as I only make paper projects/prototypes. Most of the time I have to go to hell and back to get a decent blueprint; not to mention if one still exists.
I find making the flight model very frustrating considering that the stuff I deal with is almost raw design with no prototypes which means probably little wind tunnel testing/design improvements to the design. I just make the wing very close to the real design (like jamesPLANESii) and suck up results. My M-31’s flight behavior frustrated me extensively as the wing shape caused lots of landing problems. But fixing that was almost hopeless cause guess wat, no flight data.
In spite of all the problems I have to face, I still think I do a good job.
My project was originally designed in 1947, does it still count?
I’m entering! Going to introduce a little diversity here with something from Alekseyev.
It’s concealment mechanics are ridiculously broken. It won’t loose camo values at all when it fires.
Ok thanks. I’ll participate!
+1@WiiMini
Ahh ok. Cause I’m doing a variant of the Alekseyev I-215, and from the description it probably won’t count.
@WiiMini
So stuff that’s meant to turn fight, not boom and zoom?
@WiiMini
Does a bomber destroyer count?
This is incredible!!!
I just paste them into discord and copy the link.
They also added two engines in the MiG-19 making it definitively supersonic.
+1@BagelPlane
Just so you know, the “C” in Russian translates to “S” in English.
+1Woah. That’s awesome!
I don’t really care about requesting you to build an airplane as I could build it myself in probably better quality. Thanks for your time ;)
@KenworthK100TriAxle