@WinsWings
Oh my god, this is the plane I was referring to the pictures on the internet when I was building my build! I envy you for seeing the real Me-262!
@Bryan5
I dedicate this piece to Bryan5.
You have always spotlighted my work. Thank you.
This "Schwalbe" was requested by you 1.4 years ago. I am sorry for the delay, but I have completed it. Here you go :)
@WinsWings
Thank you. This time, I made it so that I could reproduce the cross-sectional shape as faithfully as possible, especially in the nose section. If the shape is closer to that of the scale model, that's good news for me :)
@ToeTips
@Randomplayer
Thank you!
It took me a year and a half, but I finally achieved platinum. Thanks to everyone who has upvoted and spotlighted me :)
@WinsWings
I see.
The Intrepid Sea, Air & Space Museum is one of those museums that I would like to visit someday, both in terms of its valuable aircraft collection and in terms of being able to ride on a real Essex-class aircraft carrier.
@ShinyGemsBro
Thanks for your comment!
As an additional note, the last photo shows a TBF attacked by an A6M, which attacked from the turret and returned fire on the A6M.
The A6M was hit in the engine and almost crashed.
@WinsWings
Thank you!
I also referred to this article in preparing this one. Border Models new 35th scale B5N2 TYPE 97 Kate
B5N2 in 1/35 scale...fascinating, isn't it?
Sometimes online information on high precision models is useful for builds in SP.
@WinsWings
@Dogedogebread13
Thanks for the comment.
The landing gear is the best feature of this plane and I wanted to represent it well. I am glad to hear your praise.
@Kangy
Thank you for your comments!
I was very particular in making the fuselage shape as close to the actual aircraft as possible this time. I am very happy to hear your compliments on the shape of the fuselage.
Although the number of parts is a bit large. I was not able to create many detailed parts this time.
It is very difficult to reproduce the exact shape with as few parts as possible.
@RedHawkVehicleSciences
I am glad you like the A6M2 I made. And thanks for making the cool "Rufu". The take off and landing on the water went smoothly.Good work.
@Seemeing
Thank you very much! I am glad to hear such words from you.
I downloaded and flew the "Raiden" you created. It is fantastic. Beautiful appearance, fun to fly and responsive, and the cockpit is much more detailed than my Raiden.
@100
I do not know the details, but I have heard that the landing gear is stored on one side at a time due to the hydraulic system. A large hydraulic system cannot be installed in a fighter plane, which is required to be small and light, so the landing gear is stored a little at a time on each side.
However, the J2M's landing gear was electrically driven (hence the many failures in the early days). So it may not be for the above reason. To be honest, I don't know.
However, news footage from that time shows that the landing gear was stowed at different times on the left and right sides of the aircraft.
@KingOfTypos
The "double stack fuselage method"!? Wow, thanks for giving my creation technique a cool name.
Indeed, when I create a fuselage, I combine the upper and lower halves of the fuselage. This allows me more flexibility in shaping the fuselage cross section. In some cases, like the nose section of the Ju-87, I combine the top, middle, and bottom three fuselage parts ("triple stack fuselage method"?).
Whatever it is, I'm glad my technique is useful to you. I look forward to seeing the F6F you build :)
@KingOfTypos
Thanks for introducing me to your methods. I will make use of it when I can understand it.
OK, whatever plane it is (even if it's not a Bf109) I eagerly await your next work :)
@KingOfTypos
Thank you for your comment.
I'm surprised you noticed it! Yes, I am using EternalDarkness' fuselage slicing wing method, just like you. ...well, to be precise, I use something similar to that. I am ashamed to say that I am not very good at math, so I am not using EternalDarkness' fuselage slicing wing method perfectly.
The rolls may indeed be excessive. This is a reminder for my next work.
Bf109 is good! I would love to see a Bf109 made by an excellent modeler like you :)
@CZmoqi
Thank you for your comment.
You may submit your work as a "successor" to mine in accordance with the official rules as outlined by Jundroo.
Official Rules : https://www.simpleplanes.com/About/Rules
@IDNSatyaSlebew
Of course! You can use it.
I would appreciate it if you could mention in your screenshot that you used a Spitfire I made.
Looking forward to seeing your V-1 :)
@CometInSky
Thanks for your comment.
I would not be offended if you put a jet engine, missiles, helicopter rotors, or anything else on my work.
However, if you post a "Jetted F4U" under the pretense that you made it yourself from scratch, I will be offended.I think it is against the SP rules.
If you want to enjoy it privately, you are free to modify it as you like :)
@Navalmen
Thanks for your comments.
It is true that this aircraft originally had a habit of rolling left on its own. So I corrected it with wing attachment angles, etc., but I guess I didn't completely fix it. My apologies.
@LunarEclipseSP
+1Oh...You mean, this one?
It's not very good. I want to rebuild it someday.
@ChiChiWerx
+1@EntityQuerty495
Thank you very much :)
@LunarEclipseSP
+1Thank you very much! I was careful to create this build without too many parts, so I'm glad to hear you say that.
Beautiful
+1@WinsWings
+1Oh my god, this is the plane I was referring to the pictures on the internet when I was building my build! I envy you for seeing the real Me-262!
@WinsWings
+2Thank you!
I always appreciate your upvotes and spotlights. Even more than that, I'm happy to hear your compliments and comments :)
@Blueshift
+1@MobileBuilder21
Thank you. I'm glad you like it.
@ThomasRoderick
+2Thank you very much! :)
@Bryan5
+1Thank you :)
Oh, I see... Well, the SP you play wasn't the latest version.... Hope you get to play with the latest version soon.
@Erc90F4RU
+3@SonsoftheMoth
@MAPA
Thank you very much!
I will keep up the good work.
@Bryan5
I dedicate this piece to Bryan5.
You have always spotlighted my work. Thank you.
This "Schwalbe" was requested by you 1.4 years ago. I am sorry for the delay, but I have completed it. Here you go :)
@Tonnkatu
Thank you very much!
@Tonnkatu
May I use this beautiful B17 you created in the screenshots of the build I am working on?
@Tonnkatu
Oooooh! Thank you so much!!!
@WinsWings
+1Thank you. This time, I made it so that I could reproduce the cross-sectional shape as faithfully as possible, especially in the nose section. If the shape is closer to that of the scale model, that's good news for me :)
@WinsWings
+1Thank you!
Glad to hear you say that.
@ToeTips
+1@Randomplayer
Thank you!
It took me a year and a half, but I finally achieved platinum. Thanks to everyone who has upvoted and spotlighted me :)
@WinsWings
+1I see.
The Intrepid Sea, Air & Space Museum is one of those museums that I would like to visit someday, both in terms of its valuable aircraft collection and in terms of being able to ride on a real Essex-class aircraft carrier.
@WinsWings
+1Thank you for your comment!
So you saw the real TBF! I envy you.
It must have been big...it's one of the largest single-engine prop plane.
@ShinyGemsBro
Thanks for your comment!
As an additional note, the last photo shows a TBF attacked by an A6M, which attacked from the turret and returned fire on the A6M.
The A6M was hit in the engine and almost crashed.
@Englishgarden
+1@FalHartIndustries
Thank you :)
@WinsWings
+1Thank you!
I also referred to this article in preparing this one.
Border Models new 35th scale B5N2 TYPE 97 Kate
B5N2 in 1/35 scale...fascinating, isn't it?
Sometimes online information on high precision models is useful for builds in SP.
@Calensksan
Oops, forgot to equip the hook....
@WinsWings
+1@Dogedogebread13
Thanks for the comment.
The landing gear is the best feature of this plane and I wanted to represent it well. I am glad to hear your praise.
@TheTankMuseum2005
+1Thank you!
@ShinyGemsBro
What a beautiful screenshot!
Thank you so much for making such wonderful pictures with my work. I feel very honored.
@Kangy
+1Thank you for your comments!
I was very particular in making the fuselage shape as close to the actual aircraft as possible this time. I am very happy to hear your compliments on the shape of the fuselage.
Although the number of parts is a bit large. I was not able to create many detailed parts this time.
It is very difficult to reproduce the exact shape with as few parts as possible.
@Wholzz
+2@Hahahahaahahshs
@The26thMeowng
Thank you all for your comments :)
The next one is under consideration.
@RedHawkVehicleSciences
+1I am glad you like the A6M2 I made. And thanks for making the cool "Rufu". The take off and landing on the water went smoothly.Good work.
@XxRxX
Thanks :)
@Noplane
+2Thank you very much. I will continue to do my best to grow, even if only a little bit :)
Oh, this is based on the F4U I made, right?
I'm glad you liked it. But why didn't you post it as a successor to my work?
@L0RR3B0RR3
+1Thank you. I am glad to hear you say so.
@WinsWings
+1Thank you very much! :)
@Randomplayer
It is made for thumbnail photography. It is an ornamental airplane made to look like a B-29 only in appearance.
@Sergio666
Thank you very much! I am glad to hear those words. Thank you for the spotlight, too :)
@Seemeing
+2Thank you very much! I am glad to hear such words from you.
I downloaded and flew the "Raiden" you created. It is fantastic. Beautiful appearance, fun to fly and responsive, and the cockpit is much more detailed than my Raiden.
@WinsWings
+1Thanks for the comments. Thanks also for the spotlight!
@Jaspy190
+1Thank you very much :)
@Randomplayer
+1Thanks for answering the question.
@100
I do not know the details, but I have heard that the landing gear is stored on one side at a time due to the hydraulic system. A large hydraulic system cannot be installed in a fighter plane, which is required to be small and light, so the landing gear is stored a little at a time on each side.
However, the J2M's landing gear was electrically driven (hence the many failures in the early days). So it may not be for the above reason. To be honest, I don't know.
However, news footage from that time shows that the landing gear was stowed at different times on the left and right sides of the aircraft.
https://youtu.be/0t92uHBA814
So I reproduced that movement in this work.
+2@KingOfTypos
The "double stack fuselage method"!? Wow, thanks for giving my creation technique a cool name.
Indeed, when I create a fuselage, I combine the upper and lower halves of the fuselage. This allows me more flexibility in shaping the fuselage cross section. In some cases, like the nose section of the Ju-87, I combine the top, middle, and bottom three fuselage parts ("triple stack fuselage method"?).
Whatever it is, I'm glad my technique is useful to you. I look forward to seeing the F6F you build :)
+1@KingOfTypos
+1Thanks for introducing me to your methods. I will make use of it when I can understand it.
OK, whatever plane it is (even if it's not a Bf109) I eagerly await your next work :)
@KingOfTypos
+1Thank you for your comment.
I'm surprised you noticed it! Yes, I am using EternalDarkness' fuselage slicing wing method, just like you. ...well, to be precise, I use something similar to that. I am ashamed to say that I am not very good at math, so I am not using EternalDarkness' fuselage slicing wing method perfectly.
The rolls may indeed be excessive. This is a reminder for my next work.
Bf109 is good! I would love to see a Bf109 made by an excellent modeler like you :)
@MrShenanigansSP
+1Thank you for your comment.
I am glad to hear your compliments :)
@CZmoqi
Thank you for your comment.
You may submit your work as a "successor" to mine in accordance with the official rules as outlined by Jundroo.
Official Rules :
https://www.simpleplanes.com/About/Rules
How to submit as a "successor":
https://www.simpleplanes.com/Forums/View/567539/Successor-Solved
コメントありがとうございます。
Jundrooが示す公式ルールに則り、私の作品の「後継機」として投稿していただく分には構いません。
公式ルール :
https://www.simpleplanes.com/About/Rules
「後継機」として投稿する方法:
https://www.simpleplanes.com/Forums/View/567539/Successor-Solved
Excellent work!
+2Beautiful modeling with a small number of parts.
I am glad that my work has inspired you :)
@IDNSatyaSlebew
Of course! You can use it.
I would appreciate it if you could mention in your screenshot that you used a Spitfire I made.
Looking forward to seeing your V-1 :)
@CometInSky
+4Thanks for your comment.
I would not be offended if you put a jet engine, missiles, helicopter rotors, or anything else on my work.
However, if you post a "Jetted F4U" under the pretense that you made it yourself from scratch, I will be offended.I think it is against the SP rules.
If you want to enjoy it privately, you are free to modify it as you like :)
@Navalmen
+1Thanks for your comments.
It is true that this aircraft originally had a habit of rolling left on its own. So I corrected it with wing attachment angles, etc., but I guess I didn't completely fix it. My apologies.