You can get a ballpark estimate.
.
Setting your fuel to ~5-10% with dead weight to account for rest of the fuel you would usually carry, you can determine how much is spent on takeoffs and climb. Same can be done for initial cruise, but keep in mind your mass will decrease as fuel is spent - the result is not very accurate for cruise. Remove the dead weight and do the same for landing. A few simple fractions to deal with and you can essentially understand how your total fuel consumption and range will look like. It’s not accurate but it’s good enough.
.
Now, there’s a much more interesting way, and much more accurate, taught in classes. If I remember correctly it’s somewhere in the first 4 chapters of Aircraft Design: A Conceptual Approach by D.P. Raymer. You can find the textbook probably at your local library. Interesting stuff. ISBN-13: 978-1624104909
I cannot express how thankful we are that passionate individuals like you exist and can host servers for everyone to enjoy. That being said, I sincerely hope your employer is okay with that!
.
Please do not jeopardize your career over a SP server. Maybe I am worrying too much, perhaps you are your employer! But please be careful.
Their strikes are more than enough to remind them, there is no need to mention or tag them. I’m sure they don’t appreciate the attention. The issue is in the past, let’s not open the can of worms that have just been sealed, ok? @DatRoadTrainGuy19
Make snarky and borderline inflammatory comments rather than addressing in a civil manner
Escalates unnecessary drama amongst 3 users
Received warning via comment
Received another warning on profile
Blatant attacks and insults at moderators
Received strike
Why was I given a strike?!
I think there is no further discussion needed. There are plenty of comments posted already and I do not think drama and unnecessary issues like this are beneficial. The less the better.
The aircraft is beautiful. The boxy-ness still throws me off to this date as a side view still absolutely resembles a cardboard cutout of a more round aircraft lol.
@ALTMTR That is a fair question, and to be honest I don't know if it will ease the situation either, we will have to see. However, something is better than nothing, and who knows? Maybe it already have deterred some. You miss 100% of the shots you don't take.
In addition, for those who do not understand, H[]nda has a problem with people using their logos and trademarks. It is exactly why replicas such as the H[]ndajet will often be renamed the Yondajet or Bondajet. Which is also exactly why making a Honda logo and then tagging a mod... well I'm sure I don't need to explain anymore. I do not enjoy banning people, but please do not purposely waste our time either - it is not funny.
That's really interesting. The background the AI generates is quite amazing, and it would take little effort to photoshop the build onto the AI generated, or I guess "improved" background.
I really do not want to spend my time to deal with childish posts like this. We have been light on your actions does not mean you can do whatever you want. Please grow up.
Beautiful video... but just a question to be the devil's advocate here. Would the canard fore of the wing mounted in this low of a position disrupt the airflow to the wing at high AoAs? I would imagine a low pressure zone forming right aft of the canard in such maneuvers, and low pressure at the bottom of the main wing is generally not so good for a wing to be... well a wing. There's also a possibility that you might have deep stall issues found on T-tail aircraft with this, except with both of your wing and horizontal control surfaces losing authority. Also vortices and vibrations might be a problem. Cool concept regardless.
Yes actually. Unfortunately Volvos are kind of expensive up front and to maintain in the long run. As much as new cars are nice, my goal is to still make the current one at least last to when I graduate university. I can’t imagine driving nearly as much afterwards. @Gro
I should emphasize, every few weeks, not every week. Lol, I would go absolutely insane if I had do that every week. But regardless, these things are reliable as hell, just not so cheap to maintain once it gets to that age. Also corrosion becomes an issue too - we have way too much salt and snow melting solution on the roads in the winter that absolutely chews through metal. @Gro
@Gro Absolutely, my mom has been driving it since I was a kid, and now I still drive it across the province to university and back - a 1100 km round trip every few weeks. Really efficient, and a tough little bugger. Inevitable that its starting to show its age. Once this goes kaput, I'll probably look for an outback - upgrading from a mom's car to a grandma's car lol.
@Gro Subaru Legacy. Nothing fancy. but its status as a mom car keeps the insurance low lol. Also yeah, you can ignore the warning lights, but the next warning you get may be an audio-visual warning...
Not related. This post has been closed.
Idk I was bored.
.
Credits to MrSilverwolf for the plane. https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/024sK3/SkyWolf-SE-VII
You can get a ballpark estimate.
+2.
Setting your fuel to ~5-10% with dead weight to account for rest of the fuel you would usually carry, you can determine how much is spent on takeoffs and climb. Same can be done for initial cruise, but keep in mind your mass will decrease as fuel is spent - the result is not very accurate for cruise. Remove the dead weight and do the same for landing. A few simple fractions to deal with and you can essentially understand how your total fuel consumption and range will look like. It’s not accurate but it’s good enough.
.
Now, there’s a much more interesting way, and much more accurate, taught in classes. If I remember correctly it’s somewhere in the first 4 chapters of Aircraft Design: A Conceptual Approach by D.P. Raymer. You can find the textbook probably at your local library. Interesting stuff. ISBN-13: 978-1624104909
I can confidently say that it’s within the current millennium. No need to thank me.
+7Add a title smh
+6Brought you by Canon Digital Cameras.
+1Spicy! Makes me want to build a mech now. Mhmmmm.
+1@Defalt1 @Rework @IICXLVIICDLXXXIIIDCXLVII
Gentlemen, thanks for resolving this peacefully and with civility.
I am glad no fire brigade was needed to extinguish any dumpster fires.
+5Honse
+3When is a picture of rick astley going to be put on the instrument panel? I wait patiently.
+1squa-
@Rebirth Glad everything is alright, thanks.
+2I cannot express how thankful we are that passionate individuals like you exist and can host servers for everyone to enjoy. That being said, I sincerely hope your employer is okay with that!
+7.
Please do not jeopardize your career over a SP server. Maybe I am worrying too much, perhaps you are your employer! But please be careful.
B U L B U S . The curves are excellent! Well done.
The shots following "More shots at night (with illumination):" looks like a CATIA V5 rendering lol.
Done. @Questionmark
Skill issue. 🅱️ @MrSilverWolf
Their strikes are more than enough to remind them, there is no need to mention or tag them. I’m sure they don’t appreciate the attention. The issue is in the past, let’s not open the can of worms that have just been sealed, ok? @DatRoadTrainGuy19
+2I think there is no further discussion needed. There are plenty of comments posted already and I do not think drama and unnecessary issues like this are beneficial. The less the better.
I too, enjoy this game on a pregnancy tester.
+12Don’t start new drama please. It doesn’t help anyone. @DatRoadTrainGuy19
+1As long as you include the actual build and not just the 3 part default cockpit, I don’t see why not. Go for it.
+1Sorry what would be the problem preventing publishing this otherwise? @MrTrolling09
+1But can it run Crisis?
+4@Snowflake0s
+1How much did @MrSilverwolf pay you to build the Metroliner and Tri-pacer?! I demand answers.
+5The aircraft is beautiful. The boxy-ness still throws me off to this date as a side view still absolutely resembles a cardboard cutout of a more round aircraft lol.
+1@ALTMTR That is a fair question, and to be honest I don't know if it will ease the situation either, we will have to see. However, something is better than nothing, and who knows? Maybe it already have deterred some. You miss 100% of the shots you don't take.
+3In addition, for those who do not understand, H[]nda has a problem with people using their logos and trademarks. It is exactly why replicas such as the H[]ndajet will often be renamed the Yondajet or Bondajet. Which is also exactly why making a Honda logo and then tagging a mod... well I'm sure I don't need to explain anymore. I do not enjoy banning people, but please do not purposely waste our time either - it is not funny.
+1Please actually read the strike notes... I encourage you.
Thank you.
That's really interesting. The background the AI generates is quite amazing, and it would take little effort to photoshop the build onto the AI generated, or I guess "improved" background.
Elegant tube.
+7Go right ahead. @SyntheticL
I really do not want to spend my time to deal with childish posts like this. We have been light on your actions does not mean you can do whatever you want. Please grow up.
@DatRoadTrainGuy19
@Bellcat
+1I respectfully decline, for that vile vehicle is a
r e b a d g e d
S u b a r u
Big brain wheel move. Top 10 illegal SP building techniques.
+2@IICXLVIICDLXXXIIIDCXLVII You miss 100% of the shots you don't take.
+3Beautiful video... but just a question to be the devil's advocate here. Would the canard fore of the wing mounted in this low of a position disrupt the airflow to the wing at high AoAs? I would imagine a low pressure zone forming right aft of the canard in such maneuvers, and low pressure at the bottom of the main wing is generally not so good for a wing to be... well a wing. There's also a possibility that you might have deep stall issues found on T-tail aircraft with this, except with both of your wing and horizontal control surfaces losing authority. Also vortices and vibrations might be a problem. Cool concept regardless.
Done. @ShinyGemsBro
Please make an effort to utilize the successor system next time. Thanks. @MrOofington
ｊｕｎｋ用在这里跟垃圾的意思一点关系也没有。
多学点儿英文少骂人好不好？
@gard @UMR1
Yes actually. Unfortunately Volvos are kind of expensive up front and to maintain in the long run. As much as new cars are nice, my goal is to still make the current one at least last to when I graduate university. I can’t imagine driving nearly as much afterwards. @Gro
+2Based
+3I should emphasize, every few weeks, not every week. Lol, I would go absolutely insane if I had do that every week. But regardless, these things are reliable as hell, just not so cheap to maintain once it gets to that age. Also corrosion becomes an issue too - we have way too much salt and snow melting solution on the roads in the winter that absolutely chews through metal. @Gro
+1@Gro Absolutely, my mom has been driving it since I was a kid, and now I still drive it across the province to university and back - a 1100 km round trip every few weeks. Really efficient, and a tough little bugger. Inevitable that its starting to show its age. Once this goes kaput, I'll probably look for an outback - upgrading from a mom's car to a grandma's car lol.
+1@Gro Subaru Legacy. Nothing fancy. but its status as a mom car keeps the insurance low lol. Also yeah, you can ignore the warning lights, but the next warning you get may be an audio-visual warning...
+1@Gro haha. i dont want to make mine when its about to yeet its head gasket to space at any given moment.
+1What’s with the trend of people building their cars? Regardless, beautiful model, I’m sure @Vincent approves.
+1This is an insult to "Enemy".
+6Well done.
@Bellcat legs was taken off my 86 walker
bacon oeuffs havin a skill issue I see (((
bonus 1
bonus 2
Mmmm i love it when the combustion is e x t r a incomplete
+1