@FirstLandFish83828 First comment removed.
That kind of gossip is not appreciated. That is for the user to share, should it be true - not you to speculate. Please have respect for others, thank you.
Just a guess, could it be that theres some line somewhere in your FT that divides by zero when your elevation reaches 90? Or perhaps attempts to take the tangent of 90deg?
Beautiful mech. The attention to detail and effort out into this is simply stunning.
.
The whole drama thing, not so beautiful. I hope and encourage both parties to set aside their differences and resolve it peacefully.
You can get a ballpark estimate.
.
Setting your fuel to ~5-10% with dead weight to account for rest of the fuel you would usually carry, you can determine how much is spent on takeoffs and climb. Same can be done for initial cruise, but keep in mind your mass will decrease as fuel is spent - the result is not very accurate for cruise. Remove the dead weight and do the same for landing. A few simple fractions to deal with and you can essentially understand how your total fuel consumption and range will look like. It’s not accurate but it’s good enough.
.
Now, there’s a much more interesting way, and much more accurate, taught in classes. If I remember correctly it’s somewhere in the first 4 chapters of Aircraft Design: A Conceptual Approach by D.P. Raymer. You can find the textbook probably at your local library. Interesting stuff. ISBN-13: 978-1624104909
Their strikes are more than enough to remind them, there is no need to mention or tag them. I’m sure they don’t appreciate the attention. The issue is in the past, let’s not open the can of worms that have just been sealed, ok? @DatRoadTrainGuy19
Yes actually. Unfortunately Volvos are kind of expensive up front and to maintain in the long run. As much as new cars are nice, my goal is to still make the current one at least last to when I graduate university. I can’t imagine driving nearly as much afterwards. @Gro
If you have problems with this user, RESOLVE IT ELSEWHERE, or BLOCK.
.
I do not care what the context is, blatantly insulting someone's build repeatedly is extremely childish, sets awful examples for other users, and gives the site an awful look.... and surprise, surprise, is also against the rules.
.
Constructive criticism is fine. If you have a problem with the flight model, or flight controls, mention it and why. Simply throwing low grade insults into the comments does not do anything, nor does it make you look good.
.
Enough is enough. If you have problems, solve it elsewhere and ignore it here. Any additional drama will be met with a strike.
Beautiful trailing edge surfaces and high lift devices. Feel free to message me if you need some pointers with the technical side of things when it comes to leading and trailing edge devices - they're really nice as is.
@asteroidbook345 Thought about it at some point. Moving h. stab. up was not worth the troubles of funky over wing turbulences and vortices and the elusive d e e p s t a l l.
Imagine putting braces in your wings smh. Imagine not having a 1.8m span for 110g.
This message is brought you by the light weight 8 stringer semi-monocoque gang.
@bjac0 Same goes with fictional, as long as its not made to intentionally stir up drama or simply overwhelmingly insensitive, it will be allowed - always have, and always will. I made this post explicitly address replicas with respect to current world issues. You're good, don't worry.
Is this thread devolves into a hot flaming heap of comments in a dumpster fire... It will be yoinked.
Friendly reminder to please keep discussions civil. Thanks.
@JuanNotAnAlt
Do me a favor and not stir up drama at first sight of some individual. If you two lots have unresolved conflict, resolve responsibly elsewhere. Pointless teasing is uncalled for and childish.
@CharlesDeGaulle My reading comprehension of French is not bad, but my spoken French skills are awful. Exposure to French is quite minimal unless you live in or extremely near Quebec. Though, I do want to learn a bit more but I lack the free time.
Wow! We have a teacher here! Gee i wish my physics teacher could understand the joy of video games...
+3Very clean solution.
+2@Noname918181 Splattered free range organic greenhouse space ketchup.*
+2Based
+2@FirstLandFish83828 First comment removed.
+2That kind of gossip is not appreciated. That is for the user to share, should it be true - not you to speculate. Please have respect for others, thank you.
Hi Back With The Milk, I'm dad.
+2@rexzion @BaconEggs
+2Are you two だいじょうぶ？ If have the stroke, 请叫 سياره اسعاف s'il te plaît。
When your primary customer of cartels really gotta up their game in the on-the-deck speed department...
+2I stole your landing gear doors about 6 years ago. Welcome back.
+2Making a joke about the holocaust is not funny. Never was, never will be. Grow up.
+2FYI. Please do not use alt accounts to circumvent strikes.
@BogdanX Skill issue.
+2Cute and chubby little thing.
+2Uh, here is bacon, i guess.
+2🥓
Congrats!
@Brololxd Link please.
+2Skill issue. /s @WolfHunter9111
+2Done.
+2Pleb phone skill issue. @MrSilverWolf
I agree. Permanent will do. @Dathcha
+2Here, you dropped the H. You forgor. @MrSilverWolf
+2Eh, I think it’s in the grey area. @ANNYUI
+2…
Though I don’t encourage this going forward. It could potentially be misleading, situation depends.
clamp01(VerticalG>8)
That should work for a detacher, but if you want to hold the value at 1 then try
+2sum(clamp01(VerticalG>8))>0?1:0
Just a guess, could it be that theres some line somewhere in your FT that divides by zero when your elevation reaches 90? Or perhaps attempts to take the tangent of 90deg?
+2Don’t make fun of the 1-degree flap setting… it’s trying it’s best to make a difference okay? @MrSilverWolf
+2Beautiful mech. The attention to detail and effort out into this is simply stunning.
+2.
The whole drama thing, not so beautiful. I hope and encourage both parties to set aside their differences and resolve it peacefully.
@CanadianAircraftBuilder Bold of you to assume that it won't already be in an Air Canada livery.
+2You can get a ballpark estimate.
+2.
Setting your fuel to ~5-10% with dead weight to account for rest of the fuel you would usually carry, you can determine how much is spent on takeoffs and climb. Same can be done for initial cruise, but keep in mind your mass will decrease as fuel is spent - the result is not very accurate for cruise. Remove the dead weight and do the same for landing. A few simple fractions to deal with and you can essentially understand how your total fuel consumption and range will look like. It’s not accurate but it’s good enough.
.
Now, there’s a much more interesting way, and much more accurate, taught in classes. If I remember correctly it’s somewhere in the first 4 chapters of Aircraft Design: A Conceptual Approach by D.P. Raymer. You can find the textbook probably at your local library. Interesting stuff. ISBN-13: 978-1624104909
@Rebirth Glad everything is alright, thanks.
+2Their strikes are more than enough to remind them, there is no need to mention or tag them. I’m sure they don’t appreciate the attention. The issue is in the past, let’s not open the can of worms that have just been sealed, ok? @DatRoadTrainGuy19
+2Big brain wheel move. Top 10 illegal SP building techniques.
+2Yes actually. Unfortunately Volvos are kind of expensive up front and to maintain in the long run. As much as new cars are nice, my goal is to still make the current one at least last to when I graduate university. I can’t imagine driving nearly as much afterwards. @Gro
+2Ye hab teh skilm ishue
+2If you have problems with this user, RESOLVE IT ELSEWHERE, or BLOCK.
+2.
I do not care what the context is, blatantly insulting someone's build repeatedly is extremely childish, sets awful examples for other users, and gives the site an awful look.... and surprise, surprise, is also against the rules.
.
Constructive criticism is fine. If you have a problem with the flight model, or flight controls, mention it and why. Simply throwing low grade insults into the comments does not do anything, nor does it make you look good.
.
Enough is enough. If you have problems, solve it elsewhere and ignore it here. Any additional drama will be met with a strike.
Christ on a bike. Ah lawd.
+2based。
+2Beautiful trailing edge surfaces and high lift devices. Feel free to message me if you need some pointers with the technical side of things when it comes to leading and trailing edge devices - they're really nice as is.
+2Bruh.
+2Tag changed to off-topic.
@Aviator01
+2range: 820km +80
fuel efficiency: y e s (specific fuel consumption of approx. 0.61 [1/hr])
@asteroidbook345 Thought about it at some point. Moving h. stab. up was not worth the troubles of funky over wing turbulences and vortices and the elusive d e e p s t a l l.
+2b
+2漂亮
+2Imagine putting braces in your wings smh. Imagine not having a 1.8m span for 110g.
+2This message is brought you by the light weight 8 stringer semi-monocoque gang.
Beautiful tofumobile. Drives really nice. Optional attachable trailer for tofu delivery in a warzone.
+2@bjac0 Same goes with fictional, as long as its not made to intentionally stir up drama or simply overwhelmingly insensitive, it will be allowed - always have, and always will. I made this post explicitly address replicas with respect to current world issues. You're good, don't worry.
+2Is this thread devolves into a hot flaming heap of comments in a dumpster fire... It will be yoinked.
+2Friendly reminder to please keep discussions civil. Thanks.
@JuanNotAnAlt
Do me a favor and not stir up drama at first sight of some individual. If you two lots have unresolved conflict, resolve responsibly elsewhere. Pointless teasing is uncalled for and childish.
Thanks
+2@CharlesDeGaulle My reading comprehension of French is not bad, but my spoken French skills are awful. Exposure to French is quite minimal unless you live in or extremely near Quebec. Though, I do want to learn a bit more but I lack the free time.
+2Absolutely incredible. A true demonstration of the peak bovine physique.
+2Chad rotation matrices
Now format it as a formal report in LaTeX and attach it to the upload lmfao.
+2Mechanically complex pedestrian deletion apparatus
+2@SnoWFLakE0s I am indeed failure. I bring dishonor to whole family.
+2Ugh.. absolutely disgusting. In a good way.
+2