@Weebsruinedthiswebsite
This is enormous ... and reasonably detailed too.
32 might seem low ... but the numbers are now quite difficult to get high.
Games' dying, you know.
@MethaManAerospace
EXACTLY!
And exactly.
So add drag-creating rudder. I am waiting for that.
Hint: just create control surfaces that says "yaw", then offset them into each other. remember to turn "inverse" on
Hint Edit: NOOOO WHAT ARE U DOING YOU ARE CREATING DRAG ON BOTH SIDES. You do not have liftoff today.
Hint Edit Edit: You can mod the input controls. That should do the trick
Hint Edit Edit Edit: You can use airbrakes too, but they generate a small amount of ... roll. Maybe just put them on both up and down (and mod then so they don't create huge drag so to slow down the airplane)
Hint Edit Edit Edit Edit: xD
Unrelated:
Aww you are also playing SR2.
I am playing KSP1.10. Dunno why but the SR2 idea just don't get me.
Perhaps some-time-in-the-future there will be a "MMAerospace" for SR2 instead of "C7 Aerospace" for KSP. I'll wait for it.
@MethaManAerospace
You need some kind of vertical STABILIZERS
Or, have your wing pitch changed so it can help stabilize things
The reason for that is because if there is no v-stab then the aircraft have all reasons on the world to flip out (and probably result in the flat spin of death)
Make the v-stab bigger and you will end up better.
But how do the B-2 "Spirit" manage to fly?
N/A ...
Ok it had "split-drag rudder" (which basically creates drag on wingtips when needed) so it can help turn the plane.
Same as the A12A.
Just don't go crazy with the stick and I guess it will be okay ... they flew, after all.
@Fedegamer
Well, it do is capable of going 2280Km/h (mach 2.8, 800m/s) at the altitude of 15,000m (sea level).
Simpleplanes is broken. It does not intake more air as the speed went up (general trend), and all engines are linear.
The reason this is so powerful in KSP is because this thing is speed boosted -- the thrust increases linearly as speed goes up, up to 750KN or something.
But Mach 3 at high altitude also mean lots of air for your intakes, so it flies REALLY high (yes, the engines flare out at 26km but it can climb, using pure momentum, to 33Km), and REALLY fast (over 1200 m/s at altitude 15Km)
I do not have any comment on Simpleplanes. Perhaps it's too simple.
That said, I will surely return to KSP now to do other cool things. until time calls for some other coincidences ...
@Fedegamer
This is ACTUALLY my REAL pioneer series spaceplane (using mostly stock parts and .. "small landing gear bay")
spotting those parts shouldn't be difficult for you.
And yes, that bulge in the fuselage is intentional. That is the engine nacelle.
@KSPFSXandSP
lol.
Nice try but ehhh I genuinely don't think this is for "flying".
Maybe you should (or I should, if I had time) take a look at flap- wing aircrafts (that actually fly)
It behaves like toothless when it can't fly, though. That's the ... emm, good part of it.
@Fedegamer
Does it also have 130KN at sea level?
Does it flare out (well, never, for SP physics) at 2.6Km (actually a constant number?)
Dude this engine is FIERCE. I got one of my smaller birds up to 33km (was doing science runs in kerbin atmosphere). I was thinking that Panther was cool, but clearly I am wrong.
the air bleed is kinda ... shallow, though.
(does it have a front-end in ksp? it can be (almost always) only attached to the back of a fuselage, so i had not really noticed)
Time to jam this thing up against a TD25 decoupler
@GoCommitNo
Lol true I can just remove it
But I don't think it bothers THAT much.
Also consider that ... really. SP don't have much to offer (I am over at KSP now)
@UwU
Well I hadn't been split finger by any lego pieces. Their plastic wrapping, maybe. Or just improper scissor usage.
Ah, the good old days ..
I like this build. Lego style, but not overdone.
Does it have the Lego letters on the ...
Nah, it didn't. Counterfeit lego pieces ...
Just kidding. Very very good job. Bravo!
@MTBCrafter
Immensely Impressive. You did end up building it the Lego way.
My (only) lego build is the 42009, and I reasoned that it's impossible to build it the lego way (because when I started it, there is no hollowed fuselage)
It would still be immensely difficult to make it have those lego bars' holes -- consider the sheer size of that thing.
You are welcomed to try (or just drop a vote) :P
@ThunderNova
Public Transport lol ...
Not a problem for a space shuttle this size, I guess ...
very good job. Slightly challenging (but hey man, it's VTOL) so I have nothing against it.
lol. too true.
probably because the spawn had to be as big as Wright (or north runway) otherwise it would run into buildings and stuff.
Let's try this again ...
@duanyu7373
Don't worry about it.
@BogdanX
I am not too surprised to see it wildly off the scale. It's extremely difficult to make things tiny in Simpleplanes (beside scaling, and even that the attachments mess up).
I had kind of gave up on my builds, although I admit they are "cute" and they "drive nice".
@duanyu7373
No the body curve was fine for me. Subtle, but it's a square car in most sense.
Dodge Stinger? Or Swinger?
Looks like a Dodge in every sense.
That decorative inferno is very cool. Idea's nice too.
@CeeToTheZee
"This bird may look like she's lost a few chromosomes"
Nice attempt.
The idea here probably is the fact that it is not realistic-ness that would make it a good ... person, but a person that ...
You did fine.
@NightmareCorporation
I do not know what a Spitfire have to do with Initial D, but ok.
And I'm trying very hard to ignore that long poem ...
AND trying to ignore "spitfir" typos.
Oof this acceleration. I'm sure it's neither historically accurate or film-accurate, but it handles well.
And ... at this speed I'm not sure if anyone would need flaps
@701wwj666
The plan closest to what you had built is a Panzer with a Leopard turret (because the gun won't stick out of the hull, so in dense jungle it won't get tangled)
@SnoWFLakE0s
Let's say that I had a broken browser.
Why care? I'm now watching it on my laptop anyways.
lol Desmos. I'm very ...
Well, very glad that you guys almost made it work in SimplePlanes.
@scratch
Maybe let's stop building these crazy things and focus on something that's somewhat more realistic.
I had a metallic model of Mitsubishi Pajero sitting on my table top. Should do something about it ...
@scratch
lol
Does this have more downforce? I'm curious.
OK it DID have enough downforce but I'm rather ...
You are trying to have suspension on wheels which is a good intention
But suspensions that are built into the wheel are generally horrible, especially on speedy builds.
I was expecting all wheel turning, but I guess it's OK too.
Did the gold prix in 28 seconds
Tried to "improve" it with 4-wheel turning and connections of wheels using wings, but end up in the same 28 seconds.
Did mine run smoother? I don't know.
@SledDriver
I liked the feeling of setting the cameras to "chase" camera and then watch the shells fly through
clearly the big 250cm did not have the correct velocity or the camera.
Damn that shot was so close ...
Using this feel more like a doomsday device rather than a proper cannon, by the way. Feels good.
WHAM! There you go, bridge!
@Sm10684
I am considering it, right now I'm using standard vertical shocks.
You can ... figure out a way to link me to a private build. I'd like to test it out first.
You can comment on any build I had done so far for safety reasons and I'll know.
@Sm10684
You did take it to proving grounds for a spin.
Interesting design, perhaps. Lots of things doesn't work the way reality does (and a lot of things don't work the way SimplePlanes does)
Doesn't pack a lot of travel, so ehh. Still goes on to see how it would compare to a single-suspension swing arm, but good impressions.
Why? You should upload the build (at least privately, because I had a coming vehicle project lying around)
@Sm10684
For starters, pistons have perpendicular slip (against the direction they had) hence the wobbling around.
I also did notice that the ... mechanism is a bit off.
For double wishbone suspensions, I thought that the two links (the above and the lower) should have the same length, otherwise it won't ... it won't flex up and down as expected.
See my Trophy Truck for suspension examples (observe front shocks)
@SnoWFLakE0s
Good gun breech. Good handles.
I assume you took more time in those cranky numbers than the actual building, but they are very cool.
And yes, I do return from playing to give upvote.
@CrashFighter05
Sure, but why? Are they not tolling in enough profit from Simpleplanes and Simplerocket's? It wasn't there before, if you ask me.
Nice vehicle on avatar, by the way.
@haidebiany
yeah, the tracks themselves still can't take the weight. Still need the roadwheels.
Some day, I'll get myself a CNC table to make my own stuff
@Armyguy1534
I'm curious why are there so many people upvoting this ...
I mean, it wasn't even your tiger ...
but it is very creative. No upvotes from me, sorry
@Baby
I have this girl in the class that I go along with.
and her name happened to be Dora and I did kind of miss her ...
for non-modded version I still suggest the good old VTOL. Trust me better than infinite rotators.
@Chancey21
You need two things to hit a aircraft. A german gun, and a set of german optics!
Nice modeling.
Perhaps they used a different variant in their tan ... * cough * Pz. SFl. IVc ... * cough *
@zap210
Infinite rotators do remind me of a thing ... called VTOL nozzle + infinite fuel ...
Nice mechanism, but the shoes on the rear legs started to fell off pretty soon ...
@Weebsruinedthiswebsite
This is enormous ... and reasonably detailed too.
32 might seem low ... but the numbers are now quite difficult to get high.
Games' dying, you know.
Anyway, make that 33
@MethaManAerospace
EXACTLY!
And exactly.
So add drag-creating rudder. I am waiting for that.
Hint: just create control surfaces that says "yaw", then offset them into each other. remember to turn "inverse" on
Hint Edit: NOOOO WHAT ARE U DOING YOU ARE CREATING DRAG ON BOTH SIDES. You do not have liftoff today.
Hint Edit Edit: You can mod the input controls. That should do the trick
Hint Edit Edit Edit: You can use airbrakes too, but they generate a small amount of ... roll. Maybe just put them on both up and down (and mod then so they don't create huge drag so to slow down the airplane)
Hint Edit Edit Edit Edit: xD
Unrelated:
Aww you are also playing SR2.
I am playing KSP1.10. Dunno why but the SR2 idea just don't get me.
Perhaps some-time-in-the-future there will be a "MMAerospace" for SR2 instead of "C7 Aerospace" for KSP. I'll wait for it.
@MethaManAerospace
You need some kind of vertical STABILIZERS
Or, have your wing pitch changed so it can help stabilize things
The reason for that is because if there is no v-stab then the aircraft have all reasons on the world to flip out (and probably result in the flat spin of death)
Make the v-stab bigger and you will end up better.
But how do the B-2 "Spirit" manage to fly?
N/A ...
Ok it had "split-drag rudder" (which basically creates drag on wingtips when needed) so it can help turn the plane.
Same as the A12A.
Just don't go crazy with the stick and I guess it will be okay ... they flew, after all.
@Fedegamer
Well, it do is capable of going 2280Km/h (mach 2.8, 800m/s) at the altitude of 15,000m (sea level).
Simpleplanes is broken. It does not intake more air as the speed went up (general trend), and all engines are linear.
The reason this is so powerful in KSP is because this thing is speed boosted -- the thrust increases linearly as speed goes up, up to 750KN or something.
But Mach 3 at high altitude also mean lots of air for your intakes, so it flies REALLY high (yes, the engines flare out at 26km but it can climb, using pure momentum, to 33Km), and REALLY fast (over 1200 m/s at altitude 15Km)
I do not have any comment on Simpleplanes. Perhaps it's too simple.
That said, I will surely return to KSP now to do other cool things. until time calls for some other coincidences ...
@Fedegamer
Oh wow you are ... that make me even older :P
I am 19
@Fedegamer
This is ACTUALLY my REAL pioneer series spaceplane (using mostly stock parts and .. "small landing gear bay")
spotting those parts shouldn't be difficult for you.
And yes, that bulge in the fuselage is intentional. That is the engine nacelle.
@KSPFSXandSP
lol.
Nice try but ehhh I genuinely don't think this is for "flying".
Maybe you should (or I should, if I had time) take a look at flap- wing aircrafts (that actually fly)
It behaves like toothless when it can't fly, though. That's the ... emm, good part of it.
10 minite into it
+1@Quagga
That "part" is the pointy ... cone inside the the engine exaust
How did @Fedgame did it was a mystery
@Fedegamer
Does it also have 130KN at sea level?
Does it flare out (well, never, for SP physics) at 2.6Km (actually a constant number?)
Dude this engine is FIERCE. I got one of my smaller birds up to 33km (was doing science runs in kerbin atmosphere). I was thinking that Panther was cool, but clearly I am wrong.
the air bleed is kinda ... shallow, though.
(does it have a front-end in ksp? it can be (almost always) only attached to the back of a fuselage, so i had not really noticed)
Time to jam this thing up against a TD25 decoupler
@GoCommitNo
Lol true I can just remove it
But I don't think it bothers THAT much.
Also consider that ... really. SP don't have much to offer (I am over at KSP now)
@Griffon1Crosswind
+1lol.
My mom took my iPad air and replaced it with a iPad 6th gen
@UwU
+2Well I hadn't been split finger by any lego pieces. Their plastic wrapping, maybe. Or just improper scissor usage.
Ah, the good old days ..
I like this build. Lego style, but not overdone.
Does it have the Lego letters on the ...
Nah, it didn't. Counterfeit lego pieces ...
Just kidding. Very very good job. Bravo!
oh that predecessor? Ignore it -- it's unimportant. It's unlisted, too.
@plane918273645
lol for that
"not suitable for planes over mach 1"
Simpleplanes physics, right?
@MTBCrafter
Definitely. Call me in when you are about to tackle something this crazy, too!
You know, it's perhaps one of the few vehicles under the new "construction equipment" category...
@MTBCrafter
Immensely Impressive. You did end up building it the Lego way.
My (only) lego build is the 42009, and I reasoned that it's impossible to build it the lego way (because when I started it, there is no hollowed fuselage)
It would still be immensely difficult to make it have those lego bars' holes -- consider the sheer size of that thing.
You are welcomed to try (or just drop a vote) :P
@ThunderNova
Public Transport lol ...
Not a problem for a space shuttle this size, I guess ...
very good job. Slightly challenging (but hey man, it's VTOL) so I have nothing against it.
@SpicyViper
Only 419 parts pfft it’ll run smoothly
Edit: loads build and game crashes
lol. too true.
+2probably because the spawn had to be as big as Wright (or north runway) otherwise it would run into buildings and stuff.
Let's try this again ...
@plane918273645
Lol I don't even know this build exists until ... I saw one featured in another build
if they want big ones you can always scale them
@INCREASEDVELOCITY
+1Damn these are some real sëxy tracks. Too bad they really never work well ...
@duanyu7373
+2Don't worry about it.
@BogdanX
I am not too surprised to see it wildly off the scale. It's extremely difficult to make things tiny in Simpleplanes (beside scaling, and even that the attachments mess up).
I had kind of gave up on my builds, although I admit they are "cute" and they "drive nice".
@duanyu7373
No the body curve was fine for me. Subtle, but it's a square car in most sense.
Dodge Stinger? Or Swinger?
Looks like a Dodge in every sense.
That decorative inferno is very cool. Idea's nice too.
@CeeToTheZee
"This bird may look like she's lost a few chromosomes"
Nice attempt.
The idea here probably is the fact that it is not realistic-ness that would make it a good ... person, but a person that ...
You did fine.
@NightmareCorporation
I do not know what a Spitfire have to do with Initial D, but ok.
And I'm trying very hard to ignore that long poem ...
AND trying to ignore "spitfir" typos.
Oof this acceleration. I'm sure it's neither historically accurate or film-accurate, but it handles well.
+1And ... at this speed I'm not sure if anyone would need flaps
@701wwj666
The plan closest to what you had built is a Panzer with a Leopard turret (because the gun won't stick out of the hull, so in dense jungle it won't get tangled)
@SnoWFLakE0s
Let's say that I had a broken browser.
Why care? I'm now watching it on my laptop anyways.
lol Desmos. I'm very ...
Well, very glad that you guys almost made it work in SimplePlanes.
@SnoWFLakE0s I can't watch Ytube on my iPad, but I believe it would be awesome.
@scratch
Maybe let's stop building these crazy things and focus on something that's somewhat more realistic.
I had a metallic model of Mitsubishi Pajero sitting on my table top. Should do something about it ...
@scratch
lol
Does this have more downforce? I'm curious.
OK it DID have enough downforce but I'm rather ...
You are trying to have suspension on wheels which is a good intention
But suspensions that are built into the wheel are generally horrible, especially on speedy builds.
I was expecting all wheel turning, but I guess it's OK too.
Did the gold prix in 28 seconds
Tried to "improve" it with 4-wheel turning and connections of wheels using wings, but end up in the same 28 seconds.
Did mine run smoother? I don't know.
@scratch
check this out
@701wwj666
Don't worry about it.
@scratch
of course. This is lightning fast. Understeering and oversteering still kicks in, though
@SledDriver
I liked the feeling of setting the cameras to "chase" camera and then watch the shells fly through
clearly the big 250cm did not have the correct velocity or the camera.
Damn that shot was so close ...
Using this feel more like a doomsday device rather than a proper cannon, by the way. Feels good.
WHAM! There you go, bridge!
@QingyuZhou
+1Amazing, although the favorite part is, of course, the leg motors.
@Sm10684
I am considering it, right now I'm using standard vertical shocks.
You can ... figure out a way to link me to a private build. I'd like to test it out first.
You can comment on any build I had done so far for safety reasons and I'll know.
@SnoWFLakE0s
Fine. This is probably the literal worst build out.
but check this out. No?
@Sm10684
You did take it to proving grounds for a spin.
Interesting design, perhaps. Lots of things doesn't work the way reality does (and a lot of things don't work the way SimplePlanes does)
Doesn't pack a lot of travel, so ehh. Still goes on to see how it would compare to a single-suspension swing arm, but good impressions.
Why? You should upload the build (at least privately, because I had a coming vehicle project lying around)
@Sm10684
For starters, pistons have perpendicular slip (against the direction they had) hence the wobbling around.
I also did notice that the ... mechanism is a bit off.
For double wishbone suspensions, I thought that the two links (the above and the lower) should have the same length, otherwise it won't ... it won't flex up and down as expected.
See my Trophy Truck for suspension examples (observe front shocks)
@SnoWFLakE0s
Good gun breech. Good handles.
I assume you took more time in those cranky numbers than the actual building, but they are very cool.
And yes, I do return from playing to give upvote.
@TheMachinist
How long? About ten days I guess.
In reality, after about 2 days if there is no upvotes the build is largely wasted.
@CrashFighter05
Sure, but why? Are they not tolling in enough profit from Simpleplanes and Simplerocket's? It wasn't there before, if you ask me.
Nice vehicle on avatar, by the way.
@haidebiany
yeah, the tracks themselves still can't take the weight. Still need the roadwheels.
Some day, I'll get myself a CNC table to make my own stuff
@Armyguy1534
I'm curious why are there so many people upvoting this ...
I mean, it wasn't even your tiger ...
but it is very creative. No upvotes from me, sorry
despite how it looks the front wheel is NOT protruding outwards. They are the same as the rear wheel -- at x-axis 1.3500.
@Baby
I have this girl in the class that I go along with.
and her name happened to be Dora and I did kind of miss her ...
for non-modded version I still suggest the good old VTOL. Trust me better than infinite rotators.
it looked great! I mean it is simple, but what's wrong with that?
@Spikerya
look at that.
And FLAT? dude this is awesome.
ahhh but you mod those engines ... bruh.
Was looking for a flat non-modded. a little help?
@Chancey21
You need two things to hit a aircraft. A german gun, and a set of german optics!
Nice modeling.
Perhaps they used a different variant in their tan ... * cough * Pz. SFl. IVc ... * cough *
@zap210
Infinite rotators do remind me of a thing ... called VTOL nozzle + infinite fuel ...
Nice mechanism, but the shoes on the rear legs started to fell off pretty soon ...
looks tiny ...
+1