The USS Beast you see in the video is actually a user-created replica I manually spawned in. There's no detection range limit for custom spawn vehicles @CrestelAeronautics
@Telescopeplayer1 For that video, I launched the missiles without a lock, essentially using them as dumb-fire rockets. If you want them to lock, the cockpit has to have direct line-of-sight with the target. In this case, just raise the cockpit up higher
@IndesterSion I'm actually just using the (relatively) new variable-setters feature. It's the (x) icon in the bottom right, near the overload button. You can create a custom input (ie. "stage1"), and set it to: "currentAngle>10?1:Activate2". Then, you can paste "stage1" into the inputs of rotators, piston, etc. and they will act as if you had pasted "currentAngle>10?1:Activate2" into their inputs. This is useful if you have many objects that use the same input, as instead of manually editing the inputs of 8 pistons, you can edit the input in the variable setter and it will automatically apply to all 8.
@WiniMii I simplified everything bar the afterburner and managed to get it down to 562 parts (the afterburner section is over 260 parts alone btw). Hope that's good enough. There's a 300 part version that has the AB removed.
Looks beautiful - very nicely detailed!. Your next steps’ll probably making some better landing gear (try reducing brake torque, it’ll help with the spontaneous combustion)
@ChrisPy I know 7 tonnes is incredibly low for a bomber, but I have to keep it down to make the gear I want - If I want realistic mass, I'd have to increase the mass of the wheels, shocks, all the moving parts. It would just be a mess to make it work reliably (It would be decimated on any high-G manoeuvre, and SP rotator physics gets very wonky at high masses). I built this aircraft with realistic acceleration and flight performance in mind; I ignored the mass. I've tried making reliable custom gear at realistic masses before, it was just too much hassle and not worth the time.
And I love the sound!
My loaded/practical weight is 7000kg, the negative value is just from the game calculating the theoretical value of an empty fuel tank, which is incorrect as the fuel tank is massless, and would never reach that value. I know the plane sucks up a lot of fuel (7 decorative, 3 practical engines) but I just increased the fuel capacity to counter it. And the sound of a prop on a delta-wing jet bomber would drive me mad xD
Sorry if I’m coming off a little hostile btw @ChrisPy
@bramos0422 It’s one of my oldest creations, but still fun!
The USS Beast you see in the video is actually a user-created replica I manually spawned in. There's no detection range limit for custom spawn vehicles @CrestelAeronautics
+1@Mustang51 Well, they actually fire in groups of four, then separate into individual ones in the air, so kinda a cluster?
+1@Bird6369 Link in my first comment
Begin your journey of absolute destruction today!
+1@Legomaster0418 Ah, good to know. I'll update my instructions
Get it here today for free!
@SLAY3R1801 I made this before glass was introduced
@Arandomdownloader High, but with my pc, all physics settings work
@Arandomdownloader Try using high physics settings
@Telescopeplayer1 Just hold down the countermeasures button
@Telescopeplayer1 For that video, I launched the missiles without a lock, essentially using them as dumb-fire rockets. If you want them to lock, the cockpit has to have direct line-of-sight with the target. In this case, just raise the cockpit up higher
@Telescopeplayer1 which video was it? The one launched from the plane or the ground?
+1@IndesterSion I'm actually just using the (relatively) new variable-setters feature. It's the (x) icon in the bottom right, near the overload button. You can create a custom input (ie. "stage1"), and set it to: "currentAngle>10?1:Activate2". Then, you can paste "stage1" into the inputs of rotators, piston, etc. and they will act as if you had pasted "currentAngle>10?1:Activate2" into their inputs. This is useful if you have many objects that use the same input, as instead of manually editing the inputs of 8 pistons, you can edit the input in the variable setter and it will automatically apply to all 8.
Legally I must say no. I’m not sure I could get that past the FDA. @BeastHunter
+3Giphy and ImgBB @Lake
You mean the three main images at the top of the page, or the pictures/gifs in the description?@Lake
+1I use high, but it appears to work for me on the other modes too @offiry
Can you record a video and upload it somewhere? Reddit, imgur, etc. @rizkiwidiyantoro30
@rizkiwidiyantoro30 It's working fine for me on both PC and Mobile. Are you sure you're launching it correctly?
Get it here today with free shipping!
—That is, if there's any ships left
+2@Skidkid08 Try adding more weight to your aircraft
link @Coolman1011
It's actually a pretty old creation: link @TRD6932
+1link @VINENOLER2222
T
https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/1XGmKx/CT-28M-Gypsy @S1lly
@Echostar It's a mod, so I don't think it's available for mobile users unfortunately
https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/i8TXF0/Dual-Rotary-Missile-Launcher-CTA-03B-Archer @Hazerz
+5Well as I said, I’m quite busy at the moment, so you may have to wait a while… @Brayden1981
Just an occasional vid. I don’t have time right now to build anything new, but maybe in the future @Brayden1981
@BeastHunter Glad you had fun! And thx for the spotlight too!
+1“Yeah… interesting…” @CarrotSlicingCat
+2I replied to your comment, automatically tagged you @CarrotSlicingCat
+1Oh it was that post that was a direct copy of my one. I reported it so it was deleted I guess @CarrotSlicingCat
+1Interesting… @CarrotSlicingCat
That engine only provides the default orange glow VFX, not the afterburner VFX @FridayNightFunker
+1Yes using fine tuner @Bernkastel
+2Go ahead :D @Germanfox
+1@CaptFoxworth19 Here's a quick video of me making a ring
+1Nice build! What's the purpose of the engine in the nose tho (V>100)?
+2No reshade, just crop + the generic vignette filter from Windows. In this case I used the ocean and clouds 2.0 mod in some of them. @MAHADI
What exactly is it you need help with? (btw I'm terrible at building ships)
@BarracudaProtogen The newest phones'll shrug this off no problem. I'm thinking about the guy still using an iPhone 4 xD
@WiniMii I simplified everything bar the afterburner and managed to get it down to 562 parts (the afterburner section is over 260 parts alone btw). Hope that's good enough. There's a 300 part version that has the AB removed.
@Lennington
You can get it here, but it doesn’t have all the fancy gauges and things
Looks beautiful - very nicely detailed!. Your next steps’ll probably making some better landing gear (try reducing brake torque, it’ll help with the spontaneous combustion)
@ChrisPy I know 7 tonnes is incredibly low for a bomber, but I have to keep it down to make the gear I want - If I want realistic mass, I'd have to increase the mass of the wheels, shocks, all the moving parts. It would just be a mess to make it work reliably (It would be decimated on any high-G manoeuvre, and SP rotator physics gets very wonky at high masses). I built this aircraft with realistic acceleration and flight performance in mind; I ignored the mass. I've tried making reliable custom gear at realistic masses before, it was just too much hassle and not worth the time.
And I love the sound!
My loaded/practical weight is 7000kg, the negative value is just from the game calculating the theoretical value of an empty fuel tank, which is incorrect as the fuel tank is massless, and would never reach that value. I know the plane sucks up a lot of fuel (7 decorative, 3 practical engines) but I just increased the fuel capacity to counter it. And the sound of a prop on a delta-wing jet bomber would drive me mad xD
Sorry if I’m coming off a little hostile btw @ChrisPy