Wow, I like this a lot and i appreciate the work done on the engine and cockpit. Bu there are a few issues:
Fuel consumption: watch out using decorative engines. If you do use them make sure you are using that engine for thrust and you are not adding an unnecessary engine that sucks fuel.
Roll: There seems to be a problem with the roll moment on this aircraft. I'm no mirage expert but the plane yaws and rolls long after you bring it to the center.
Afterburner: Seems to take a bit long to engage the afterburner but that's it
Overall this was a well thought out build and I appreciate all the work you put in this :)
P.S. how are you getting such good AOA out of this?
You need to put more effort into details such as the engine nozzles and the flight model. You also need to do some more research on the plane such as armament and how it flies. Then you will have a good plane. As of right now it’s missing a lot of things but it’s not bad for only 240 parts
So on those make sure they activate at different throttle levels then. Ex:
99% activates first ring and 100% activates the second ring. Just use the code I had and replace .95 with .99@LieutenantSOT
use the one on my t-38 it works for both afterburners and engine nozzle codes it will activate afterburner at 96% which is is more accurate so that each 1% is an afterburner ring (yes it works like this irl). For example, if I built an f-16 I would put it at 96% for mil power and each additional percent is one of the five rings of afterburner.
Well assuming that the radar is powerful enough to identify the F-22 which is highly unlikely, it would be an interesting fight for sure. Dogfights a toss up but F-22 will win BVR 9/10 times. Only short wavelength radar could detect the aircraft and that is found mainly on ground radar and AWACS. Even then short wave radar only gives a general area in which the object is so it couldn’t lock it up. It’s very unlikely that a gripen would lock a F-22 up outside 15 miles. But that is mostly just due to stealth characteristics. That’s why the gripen is the best 4++ aircraft but not the best aircraft by a good margin.
@757simmer
I love how GTA just puts a split intake and another stabilizer and calls it something completely ridiculous even though we al know its basically an f-16
Update: I'm redoing the cabin to have a nice cockpit and electronics I've installed 4 JAGM launchers in the hull and I've figured out the maneuvering issues.
@PapaKernels yeah ik the colors are different in the water. its cuz im using glass and you have to set them to different colors to get whatever color you want
They might as well have had crash test dummies fly the prototypes. Those things went up in flames a lot b4 the AOA limiter got better.
@AWESOMENESS360 I'm making plat aircraft and you got plats making bronze aircraft. Then they get twice the points I do bc they are popular on discord
@AWESOMENESS360 very true
I'm disappointed with the missiles. You can make simple AIM9s in abt 15 parts.
Wow, I like this a lot and i appreciate the work done on the engine and cockpit. Bu there are a few issues:
Fuel consumption: watch out using decorative engines. If you do use them make sure you are using that engine for thrust and you are not adding an unnecessary engine that sucks fuel.
Roll: There seems to be a problem with the roll moment on this aircraft. I'm no mirage expert but the plane yaws and rolls long after you bring it to the center.
Afterburner: Seems to take a bit long to engage the afterburner but that's it
Overall this was a well thought out build and I appreciate all the work you put in this :)
P.S. how are you getting such good AOA out of this?
@ChiChiWerx @ollielebananiaCFSP or are you simulating pitot tube pressure
@ollielebananiaCFSP @ChiChiWerx isn't it just TAS/343
Not bad. Next time try to use custom co trip surfaces. 😃
Yeah PID in this game is kinda doodoo
+1Russian Bias
And not even a single change. Wow. That’s pathetic.
So not even a credit?
Very true HMU if you ever want advice on something @UltraLight
+1No I think that’s just for leading the target bc I don’t see a gravity constant anywhere @asteroidbook345
You need to put more effort into details such as the engine nozzles and the flight model. You also need to do some more research on the plane such as armament and how it flies. Then you will have a good plane. As of right now it’s missing a lot of things but it’s not bad for only 240 parts
So on those make sure they activate at different throttle levels then. Ex:
+199% activates first ring and 100% activates the second ring. Just use the code I had and replace .95 with .99@LieutenantSOT
@asteroidbook345 grr guess ill just put a CIWS on my build. I really wanted to have my m242 bushmaster autocannon
@asteroidbook345 any idea on how to fix that?
use the one on my t-38 it works for both afterburners and engine nozzle codes it will activate afterburner at 96% which is is more accurate so that each 1% is an afterburner ring (yes it works like this irl). For example, if I built an f-16 I would put it at 96% for mil power and each additional percent is one of the five rings of afterburner.
Also, it’s hard to understand your English I would advise getting a better translator.👍🏻@757simmer
Well assuming that the radar is powerful enough to identify the F-22 which is highly unlikely, it would be an interesting fight for sure. Dogfights a toss up but F-22 will win BVR 9/10 times. Only short wavelength radar could detect the aircraft and that is found mainly on ground radar and AWACS. Even then short wave radar only gives a general area in which the object is so it couldn’t lock it up. It’s very unlikely that a gripen would lock a F-22 up outside 15 miles. But that is mostly just due to stealth characteristics. That’s why the gripen is the best 4++ aircraft but not the best aircraft by a good margin.
@757simmer
“I thought I blocked you” lmfao
😂
@asteroidbook345
@X4JB ok bro you need to chill. He's just trying to share stuff that Nagisa deleted. He gave credit so there's no need to freak out
@asteroidbook345 currently it's not accounting for gravity
too much boost
puts a super cool technical thing on a totally useless build. lol
We should also have a data collection service which unwillingly steals our info and sells it to companies. Great idea.
@AndrewGarrison
K thnx@asteroidbook345
lol how did you do this
+3hey so for the turret position should i have the horizontal and vertical rotators in the same spot?
I love how GTA just puts a split intake and another stabilizer and calls it something completely ridiculous even though we al know its basically an f-16
+1@asteroidbook345 kthnx
@PioThePioneer sure lol
@asteroidbook345 so how tf do i use this lmao
@asteroidbook345 crap i cant find it
@asteroidbook345 k thnx m8
@asteroidbook345 hey can you do the code on the boat? it needs to compensate for parallax and idk how to do that.
@asteroidbook345 darn why don't the devs fix it?
@MulletMan001 It is hits around 70 knots at top speed
@asteroidbook345 hey i cant get engine exhaust to stay true to its hex code im trying to get white. any idea on the code or how to do that?
@UltraLight It doesn't really need it tbh lol thanks for the offer though
@asteroidbook345 should I make the turret have auto-aim or manual and should it have proximity detonating rounds or nah
Update: I'm redoing the cabin to have a nice cockpit and electronics I've installed 4 JAGM launchers in the hull and I've figured out the maneuvering issues.
@asteroidbook345 lol
@PapaKernels yeah ik the colors are different in the water. its cuz im using glass and you have to set them to different colors to get whatever color you want
@asteroidbook345
quick I need a more controversial and clickbaity title
yeah this happened on the F-106 or 102 i believe
+1@asteroidbook345
+1Nice!
@tucan I didnt develop the game but coding is extremely hard