omg its someone on the internet actually admitting they were wrong this is such a weird feeling lol. kudos for being reasonable. like actually this is rare.
@EngineerOtaku @asteroidbook345
most ppls fictional builds exist outside the laws of physics and they make it a superplane. Superplanes are boring everyone can do it but if you can do fictional builds which have realistic limits on them they are cool and good. If you do fictional builds you should look at other planes from the timeframe and pick different characteristics from each one that you find interesting and practical. When I see most ppls builds they have something on there that doesn't make much sense is impractical for the time period or something that doesn't really work. @asteroidbook345 @FairFireFlight @Technodium
looks good and easily wins the competition but the flight models is lackluster. She turns way too slow a Su-25 can pull 5 gs safely with not much difficulty in a level turn the most im getting rn is around 2.8 the turn rate of the SU-25 is 16-17 degrees per second im getting 8 max with the maximum turn performance parameters. It also lacks the armament synonymous with the SU-25 the S-25Ls I believe you are also missing a hardpoint for R-73s. It also would have been cool to maybe see SPPU-22s on here. Looks good but that's abt it. sorry for the harsh review this time but i think some more research would have greatly helped you
if you are doing this make the buoyancy parameter something that is more stable. you could prob just keep the default codes for that tbh. i love the ocean mod but its hard to work with sometimes
Well I don’t like doing that lolz I know a lot about the T version bc of DCS I’ve actually used it’s encyclopedia to help with building my su 30@asteroidbook345
I was joking lol now they are working I heard that they had some developmental issues with the jet engines for a long time. I know that had a problem with the homemade one so they used the Al-31F for a long time tho @Dllama4
Idk it doesn’t feel stable enough. I’m used to the standard versions with downgraded avionics and flight control system. Normally it is more stable but idk if it’s any different on the UB due to upgrades.
One more thing:
When you are making the intakes look at how it connects to the fuselage carefully. You will notice that it is a straight line from the wing across the intake and into the fuselage. Here’s a good reference. linky
i understand i actually didnt know that abt the sm variant i mostly work with the t model @asteroidbook345
this is actually rlly cool very original ideas in this i love it! although a large jet bomber/fighter having 1:1 thrust isnt very realistic
needs some more parts for detail but it looks pretty dang good bro keep it up!
+1lol jkjkjkjkjkjk
ok where do u live...
omg its someone on the internet actually admitting they were wrong this is such a weird feeling lol. kudos for being reasonable. like actually this is rare.
@EngineerOtaku @asteroidbook345
very plausible design and it looks great i love it
omg tag me
most ppls fictional builds exist outside the laws of physics and they make it a superplane. Superplanes are boring everyone can do it but if you can do fictional builds which have realistic limits on them they are cool and good. If you do fictional builds you should look at other planes from the timeframe and pick different characteristics from each one that you find interesting and practical. When I see most ppls builds they have something on there that doesn't make much sense is impractical for the time period or something that doesn't really work. @asteroidbook345 @FairFireFlight @Technodium
looks good and easily wins the competition but the flight models is lackluster. She turns way too slow a Su-25 can pull 5 gs safely with not much difficulty in a level turn the most im getting rn is around 2.8 the turn rate of the SU-25 is 16-17 degrees per second im getting 8 max with the maximum turn performance parameters. It also lacks the armament synonymous with the SU-25 the S-25Ls I believe you are also missing a hardpoint for R-73s. It also would have been cool to maybe see SPPU-22s on here. Looks good but that's abt it. sorry for the harsh review this time but i think some more research would have greatly helped you
nice E-3 btw
@MinWiii stop getting mad abt ios mods lol i play half the time on IOS so i get what ur talking abt but he can't do anything abt that.
if you are doing this make the buoyancy parameter something that is more stable. you could prob just keep the default codes for that tbh. i love the ocean mod but its hard to work with sometimes
pretty much impossible for anyone to download but the detail alone deserves a spotlight
Mom can i have an a-10
no we have an a-10 at home
a-10 at home:
su-25T
lol @MrSilverWolf
lol
ew imagine making general aviation aircraft
+1ik ik lol @SimplyPlain
the original brrt
@Site I agree with you on the livery
nice
kool
BONX
Monkë
Like how you went with factory aluminum for the teaser. Classic.
+1Low key thought this was part of ur cursed series lmao when i saw saab and b-17 in the same name
Yall need to get used to sarcasm lol
Nah i waznt. Just feels different from dcs so it might just be a variant thing@edensk
Ahahahahah yall thought i was serious? Hahahahahaha! Nah man its really good @realSavageMan @MrGreen
Bad quality and very ugly @realSavageMan
Uggo
Ok lol @Higuy453
@edensk I feel like this one bobs a lot with stick input it should have high AOA like what you have but not as much bobbing
@Higuy453 nope :/
Looks great so far!
Imagine owning one of these
Well I don’t like doing that lolz I know a lot about the T version bc of DCS I’ve actually used it’s encyclopedia to help with building my su 30@asteroidbook345
Darn was gonna make one of these
I was joking lol now they are working I heard that they had some developmental issues with the jet engines for a long time. I know that had a problem with the homemade one so they used the Al-31F for a long time tho @Dllama4
One of these in the movie was a t-38
Everything else look awesome!
+2Idk it doesn’t feel stable enough. I’m used to the standard versions with downgraded avionics and flight control system. Normally it is more stable but idk if it’s any different on the UB due to upgrades.
+1Freaking @edensk always stealing my flight model opportunities lol
If it can’t be me I’m glad it’s you bud lol
You never said how small we could make it or how large we can make the gun scale
One more thing:
When you are making the intakes look at how it connects to the fuselage carefully. You will notice that it is a straight line from the wing across the intake and into the fuselage. Here’s a good reference. linky
Lol
Mistake
I’m sorry but this isn’t realistic. The afterburners work on this. Lol
Lol @RandomUser09