Very good design! I especially like the engine design although with engines this size I would imagine it could get supersonic but they are only turbofans so it is a bit confusing. Subsonic high efficency makes sense but more than likely irl it would be supersonic at lower payloads and with a shorter range kind of like the a-6, but its a different way to go i guess and thats what makes it cool!
i agree with @SodiumIodide about some things being misrepresented, it seems you talk down a lot on the F-35. regarding information collection, wikipedia states only public values for certain variants and therefore is not very reliable. True speed of aircraft and other values are usually hidden from the public as much as possible. Another thing needed to truly gauge an aircraft is how it is used which also seems to be missing here. Its not that you didnt use facts, you did with some inaccuracies , but you left out a lot of key information as well. @CharlesDeGaulle
and another few things
1. the F-35 actually does have a good turn rate the poor dogfight performance is more myth than fact
2. the F-22 is more maneuverable than the rafale (the published numbers do not reflect the upgraded FCAS turn rates in the raptor)
3. carrier compatibility doesnt really mean much in terms of fighter performance and the quality of the airframe the exception being the F-35C and F-35B vs the F-35A model since the B and C have different kinematics and are heavier and more expensive than the a model
Idk it doesn’t feel stable enough. I’m used to the standard versions with downgraded avionics and flight control system. Normally it is more stable but idk if it’s any different on the UB due to upgrades.
@Platinunswan you might be attaching it wrong make you only use the attachment editor to attack the aircraft to the detacher and then nudge it into place. This weapon has been working through all updates so it is most likely user error
Just send a message to ED I’m already asking other ppl to do the same we had a solution for a reason and now ppl are abusing it to get more visibility than the others and it ends up doing just the opposite as everyone wants to do that @mLk
What I’ve been saying they should have done on the f-22 so sad lol but my idea is it’s actually flush to the wing and more of half of the shape you have there
Most comments that I make like that are taken the wrong way. Wasn’t meaning to spit on anyone’s grave and I’m definitely not saying it’s good that 10 nazis died along with 150 civs. @GeneralPatrick2
"Flight model=30
Are the flight model is accurate to the real world?"
tbh you're not the best judge of this. Most of your aircraft have inaccurate flight models. I could judge the flight models if you would like bc I'm very good at tuning these for ppl including the f-16 for Papi2Chulo, typhoon for krmo, and the harrier for Destroyerz117.
I would be happy to do this as I would like some simple target planes to dogfight against and to spawn.
I would be happy to help and it would be good if you added krmos forum post as a guide to make realistic flight models.
did you say lynx Arma 3 PTSD kicks in
+1Very good design! I especially like the engine design although with engines this size I would imagine it could get supersonic but they are only turbofans so it is a bit confusing. Subsonic high efficency makes sense but more than likely irl it would be supersonic at lower payloads and with a shorter range kind of like the a-6, but its a different way to go i guess and thats what makes it cool!
+1me and the bois going to pick up our variable intake ramp F-15s and nukes
+1im confused whats going on?
+1i agree with @SodiumIodide about some things being misrepresented, it seems you talk down a lot on the F-35. regarding information collection, wikipedia states only public values for certain variants and therefore is not very reliable. True speed of aircraft and other values are usually hidden from the public as much as possible. Another thing needed to truly gauge an aircraft is how it is used which also seems to be missing here. Its not that you didnt use facts, you did with some inaccuracies , but you left out a lot of key information as well. @CharlesDeGaulle
+1so its a military cargo/resupply ship
+1for u to be cringe and to make a joke that no one laughed at? @X4JB
+1i hope this turns into a joke and not drama 😂
+1and clearly potatos are the meta in the aircraft game just put one in any engine and boom 😂
very well put @Kangy
+1and another few things
+11. the F-35 actually does have a good turn rate the poor dogfight performance is more myth than fact
2. the F-22 is more maneuverable than the rafale (the published numbers do not reflect the upgraded FCAS turn rates in the raptor)
3. carrier compatibility doesnt really mean much in terms of fighter performance and the quality of the airframe the exception being the F-35C and F-35B vs the F-35A model since the B and C have different kinematics and are heavier and more expensive than the a model
Sweet!
+1also if you are going to make a ac-130 go ahead and make it an AC-130J Ghostrider thats the best version
+1this is rlly cool
+1needs some more parts for detail but it looks pretty dang good bro keep it up!
+1ew imagine making general aviation aircraft
+1Like how you went with factory aluminum for the teaser. Classic.
+1Idk it doesn’t feel stable enough. I’m used to the standard versions with downgraded avionics and flight control system. Normally it is more stable but idk if it’s any different on the UB due to upgrades.
+1that turbine sound is beautiful btw
+1very impressive!
+1i have 747s fly over my house sometimes its usually in the winter bc of wind direction
+1Efficiency 30% @AN2Felllla
+1I clearly missed something in the past few days
+1@Platinunswan you might be attaching it wrong make you only use the attachment editor to attack the aircraft to the detacher and then nudge it into place. This weapon has been working through all updates so it is most likely user error
+1@EternalDarkness
+1ppl are flooding discord ads again...
Just send a message to ED I’m already asking other ppl to do the same we had a solution for a reason and now ppl are abusing it to get more visibility than the others and it ends up doing just the opposite as everyone wants to do that @mLk
+1What I’ve been saying they should have done on the f-22 so sad lol but my idea is it’s actually flush to the wing and more of half of the shape you have there
+1I agree with @Leota down there. ppl take things too seriously but that's prob cuz were online and it's hard to get the true tone through a chat
+1@Tookan mounts DShK on shopping cart lol
+1The most fun planes are actually ones with limitations.
+1thanks guys!
+1@DDVC
@toxicgamer88
@LieutenantSOT idk a bunch of hydrogen and helium still sounds dangerous to me
+1Safest ever built. Burns to ground in one of the most spectacular explosions humankind has witnessed. Lol
+1@LieutenantSOT
Well since I spelled it kthnxbye with the n it works as a separate off brand and no longer falls under the jurisdiction of the council. Lol @Chancey21
+1Most comments that I make like that are taken the wrong way. Wasn’t meaning to spit on anyone’s grave and I’m definitely not saying it’s good that 10 nazis died along with 150 civs. @GeneralPatrick2
+1Ik was joke. @GeneralPatrick2
+1Thank you @GeneralPatrick2
+1@TheMegaMauster dragged out of his room by the Chinese police
+1honestly doesn't look bad but the flight model isn't great. ill test it and rate the flight model for the challenge tomorrow when i have more time
+1@gabi123 just a saying here
+1толстый
+1@Tookan many more titles to be added to the seires. i legit don't care wut ppl think lol. this is more of a meme post with teaser attached tho lol
+1you would be a bad carrier pilot lols
+1DShKa Scout Car plz?
+1@TatsuTheCleaningFairy lol i thought it said aircraft not airplane. oof
+1lol
+1@WarHawk95 you right tho
+1@Tookan not for long...
+1"Flight model=30
Are the flight model is accurate to the real world?"
tbh you're not the best judge of this. Most of your aircraft have inaccurate flight models. I could judge the flight models if you would like bc I'm very good at tuning these for ppl including the f-16 for Papi2Chulo, typhoon for krmo, and the harrier for Destroyerz117.
+1I would be happy to do this as I would like some simple target planes to dogfight against and to spawn.
I would be happy to help and it would be good if you added krmos forum post as a guide to make realistic flight models.
Panik
+1Calm
Panik
@AzureCorp
Not possible. You can make the missile super small to make it almost imperceptible
+1