I don’t really see the purpose of it unless I want a gunship to stay in place...
.
.
I want to experiment
.
Edit: I did and it was not good for me. After the craft accelerates again, extreme drop in FPS occurs. I’ll try now on a low part version
.
Edit 2: I’ll post a separate forum but yeah. It’s an issue of part count.
Most fighter aircraft are unstable. The on board computers on all of those aircrafts make it stable. Since SP doesn’t have those systems in place, you will feel the actual effects of instability utilized by them fighters @DualizedRain
I swear this plane just went overly complex when I was building it like the F-35. Originally, this plane was supposed to be a simpler 300 part plane @ThomasRoderick
It is actually the inspiration. @ThomasRoderick I thought that the F-35 was mediocre, and the F-22 could’ve been more useful if it was VTOL capable. So that’s what I did
All current 5th gen Aircrafts
.
Not one tank, but many. Includes the ff: VK16.01, Leopard 2, Tortoise (A34 I believe). FV 4202, FV 205, Challenger 1 and 2, M1 Abrams, T34, T-34, LTTB
Started way back when I’m new to FPS shooters like CS. Then I saw an animation by FlashDecks featuring “Striker”. His play is similar to mine and now I’ve adapted the name to every gaming account. Eventually I thought of a lore why Striker is my name (now considered a callsign) some years ago.
Personal opinion: the front of the ship has too steep ( i do not know if I used the proper term there) of a curve. Make it either longer or some else.
.
Typically the shape of the front of the ship is a much shallower curve. I would suggest checking out on some blueprints of a carrier or just any other ship.
According to the post’s title, yeah @randomusername
I don’t really see the purpose of it unless I want a gunship to stay in place...
+1.
.
I want to experiment
.
Edit: I did and it was not good for me. After the craft accelerates again, extreme drop in FPS occurs. I’ll try now on a low part version
.
Edit 2: I’ll post a separate forum but yeah. It’s an issue of part count.
Most fighter aircraft are unstable. The on board computers on all of those aircrafts make it stable. Since SP doesn’t have those systems in place, you will feel the actual effects of instability utilized by them fighters @DualizedRain
Tag me pls
Better if you used the headings but yeah this also works
+1Teach me when you graduate m8
PUBG and whatever else I find interesting
I swear this plane just went overly complex when I was building it like the F-35. Originally, this plane was supposed to be a simpler 300 part plane @ThomasRoderick
+2It is actually the inspiration. @ThomasRoderick I thought that the F-35 was mediocre, and the F-22 could’ve been more useful if it was VTOL capable. So that’s what I did
This is too big but this is the military (our military) Nothing is too big
I have a plane halfway done that can be readily be converted for the Multirole Carrier Capable so I’ll pic A) @mikoyanster
Underrated build. Here lemme give you a spotlight
What challenge? And what would be the content cause I’m interested @mikoyanster
+1Yes I did and I don’t know how. I haven’t thought of the angling but I’m sure I didn’t do that. But that tip will help me in the future @BogdanX
Awesome is an understatement for this build
+1All current 5th gen Aircrafts
.
Not one tank, but many. Includes the ff: VK16.01, Leopard 2, Tortoise (A34 I believe). FV 4202, FV 205, Challenger 1 and 2, M1 Abrams, T34, T-34, LTTB
Sorry m8 I am tired. Last five minutes before night night @metallicplanes
Hi m8 Striker251 is the nickname of my operative there
m8 rly? I thought you’ve based it from the GTA V @Viper3000ad
I got JDAMs
+1And they never miss yahhh
.
*insert explosions here
I was referring to the Opressor Mk2 of the GTA V @Viper3000ad
You see it as a fun racing flying bike but I see it as the harbinger of death flown by a tryhard in the online session
Oh no...
+1.
I forgot my coffee
If we look at the actual physics, most of these are plausible. Given enough items and the relativistic perspectives we need to look at.
He gonna be yeeted across space and time in our laboratories
Exogay. But what if the turret needs to turn while soldiers are using the IPM? Wouldn’t they fall off?
@QingyuZhou can you help with me here? [Nevermind m8 I solved it]
I am never so confused and curious in my life about a headband
Kinda like how I am killing you but with the use of the butterfly effect
I dare you to recreate its manga with SP photos
Hu
“Ooh wow” is an understatement
Meant to be the spot where you can mod air refuel but that’s up to your interpretation. @Chancey21
+1Oof...?
Better start up with a Prototype
- Accident
- Fun
- Fictional (so far)
- Both honestly
- Started way back when I’m new to FPS shooters like CS. Then I saw an animation by FlashDecks featuring “Striker”. His play is similar to mine and now I’ve adapted the name to every gaming account. Eventually I thought of a lore why Striker is my name (now considered a callsign) some years ago.
+1Part count: definitely more than two
+2Lol
The fuselage low key resembles an egg plane
Edit to text has been made. @BlueCitrus
INB4 our ship gets yeeted Into the 2nd dimension
“You little fo—“ he got dinged by a pan from Dr. Bright because it’s about to sound like a pun @LancasterAce
I will seriously destroy your cat’s left toenail with a chopstick for this joke cause it got me so good it’s bad
+2Personal opinion: the front of the ship has too steep ( i do not know if I used the proper term there) of a curve. Make it either longer or some else.
.
Typically the shape of the front of the ship is a much shallower curve. I would suggest checking out on some blueprints of a carrier or just any other ship.
The wheels only have 4 nuts in a 5 nut installation
+2I want to but I also don’t want to
Was about to say those modded air brakes but randomusername has already said it
Hard to make but worth it.
What seems to be the problem?
I think it functions more of a coil gun than the Railgun