@Abhishek700
He means that your plane has to be a successor of this challenge. You do this by putting the plane as a subassembly and the bringing it out after down loading the challenge.
@Strikefighter04
Good but I haven't been able to get into the RP action lately. I'm supposedly in a defence pact with Scarynn (Hellraiser) but he hasn't followed up on it yet.
@Blue0Bull Yes and he was rightly banned for modifying bogdanx's harrier but that does not mean he has not produced great works of his own. His strategy is to see how specific types of builds are made and then his uses that to create his own. It's called reverse engineering. It is a real-world concept. It is how countries China, Russia, and various other countries create their military equipment.
A prime example of what I was talking about. The details are phenomenal and I know that you put some real dedication into this. Yet, why does it only have 17 upvotes and 34 downloads? It's Simple. Somethings that don't deserve recognition overshadow the ones that do. But this doesn't mean you should lose morale. See, you tagged me to your tank, and this allowed me to see how awesome it is. You should try making teasers so that everyone else knows how awesome it is too. In this way, you will earn the recognition you deserve.
@Notaleopard
You flew right past the one point I was trying to prove in that long essay. I am not critiquing the aircraft itself, but the moderator's decision to feature it!
@JohnnyBoythePilot
Yes I like to take inspiration from real world aircraft to create my own home-brewn designs, And creating them is actually really satisfying.
Grading: 45/50
Flight Performance: Great
Historical accuracy: everything is good but one thing, there is one key difference between the MiG-29 and MiG-35, the MiG-35 had a much higher cockpit.
STRONKNESS: Putin approves!
Make Saeqeh of the Iranian Airforce!!
+1upvoted
+1Haha this NUK country barely has any military technology. What kind of war will they fight?
+1lmao this LancasterAce dude can't even spell
+1@Abhishek700
+1Yes frigates are easier to build than aircraft carriers
Just better graphics. You can find them on IOS now too.
+1Woops wasactually trying to press the back button
+1I might revise these rules a bit in my post.
Y'know make the writing more clear, fix all the grammar issues, spelling too yeah.
Honestly Bman01 these are good rules but if you don't present them in a good way, nobody will follow them.
+1Good start. Cockpit could be improved.
+1I like it. Very fast and carries lots of weapons.
+1@Abhishek700
+1He means that your plane has to be a successor of this challenge. You do this by putting the plane as a subassembly and the bringing it out after down loading the challenge.
My air force lacks a stealth fighter, so I would like to produce these under license. What do you suggest the price of the program will be?
+1@Bman01
+1Looks less weird now that you've provided some context.
@Strikefighter04
+1Good but I haven't been able to get into the RP action lately. I'm supposedly in a defence pact with Scarynn (Hellraiser) but he hasn't followed up on it yet.
@Abhishek700
+1@ghakhay
@BlackhattAircraft
+1You know man, the more grammatically correct your writing is, the more credible it'll sound.
@Spacedoge12345plane
+1It's already done, no need to worry about it now
@Spacedoge12345plane
+1It'll literally take 2 seconds
hey man, who pushed you to gold?
+1@Blue0Bull Yes and he was rightly banned for modifying bogdanx's harrier but that does not mean he has not produced great works of his own. His strategy is to see how specific types of builds are made and then his uses that to create his own. It's called reverse engineering. It is a real-world concept. It is how countries China, Russia, and various other countries create their military equipment.
+1A prime example of what I was talking about. The details are phenomenal and I know that you put some real dedication into this. Yet, why does it only have 17 upvotes and 34 downloads? It's Simple. Somethings that don't deserve recognition overshadow the ones that do. But this doesn't mean you should lose morale. See, you tagged me to your tank, and this allowed me to see how awesome it is. You should try making teasers so that everyone else knows how awesome it is too. In this way, you will earn the recognition you deserve.
+1@Notaleopard
+1You flew right past the one point I was trying to prove in that long essay. I am not critiquing the aircraft itself, but the moderator's decision to feature it!
@Aeromen
+1true
Is that a JF-17 in the first picture?
+1@Aeromen
+1Even if they lack details, most of his aircraft come with great functionality.
@randomusername
+1@SuperSix @Dakraken @Strikefighter04
+1+1 for Tunisian roundels
+1@AverroesIndustries
+1soon dont worry
@Winstonlharambe
+1I would prefer not to kill my device.
@randomusername
+1significantly less. 227 parts
how to join RP?
+1@Spacedoge12345plane
+1It is only a temporary ban, he will return soon
When I use magnification in freecam, it is not carried over to the screenshot, why?
+1@StallFlight
+1I uploaded the F-16,
Here's the link (https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/U3un6i/F-16F-Fighting-Falcon)
@LusKa
+1My main focus is performance not details.
@ACEPILOT109 @ThePrototype
+1Thank you! any suggestions?
@AverroesIndustries
+1Maybe soon, but I am preparing something you might like
Ey that's pretty guuuuud
+1@JohnnyBoythePilot
+1This one is a combination of a Su-30 And American F-15/16
@JohnnyBoythePilot
+1Yes I like to take inspiration from real world aircraft to create my own home-brewn designs, And creating them is actually really satisfying.
@randomusername
+1@AviownCorp
Thank you!!
@JohnnyBoythePilot
+1A lot of their """""""new""""""" aircraft are just reverse engineered F-4s or F-5s
I'm in.
+1@randomusername
+1Thank you!
@FastDan yeah I focus more on performance than details
+1DORITO APPROVES!
+1Grading: 45/50
+1Flight Performance: Great
Historical accuracy: everything is good but one thing, there is one key difference between the MiG-29 and MiG-35, the MiG-35 had a much higher cockpit.
STRONKNESS: Putin approves!
@AZAMGAMING
its means "monster"
Makes sense because this is an attack jet and ground forces will be scared of it.
@OmegaDestroyer
No problem