@AircraftExperimental WoT may not be the most historically or mechanically accurate, but it is able to explore how tank design could have progressed in both reasonable and unreasonable ways. We can enjoy all the possible designs that could have been made.
I know PEAs have pretty low part counts, and I think they have their niche. But imo, people like MisterT or BogdanX (he's probably not around anymore) are kings of when quality meats quantity, lower part quantity of course. BogdanX had a superb Bronco that was 650 parts and you'd think it was 1000. And MisterT's Superbmarine Spitfires (pun intended) are absolute performance beauties at 990 parts for what look like 1250 part builds. Of course, not everyone can run those high "low" part counts, and that's where PEAs come in. But overall those old pros were it when it came to beauty and part efficiency.
In my opinion, Juno is fantastic, with much possibility for flying stuff and doing weird s* in space. Its builder has its own charm and flexibility and advantages as well. On the other hand, SP, it's builder system and even its bugs are more well suited to things like building tanks (which I love) or insanely detailed craft. On Juno, the graphics are part of the game, in SP, we build the graphics. Tbh, SP is better suited to creating eye pleasing stuff while Juno is better for flying things.
Create a bit at the back with a useable artillery gun (3, 6, or 8 inch). You can probably use more AG grps, and some either or programming on those grps so that when u switch from mobility to gun modes, the other half doesn't move haha. I remember trying to build a Strv 103 style tank, and I had gotten the controls to be pretty much point and shoot using SP on PC, it used AG grps to switch between driving and firing modes.
@YOURGORILLA1246 Use wings (fill them with fuel), fuselage blocks, the long turbo jet engine, air intakes, make sure the CoT, CoM, and CoL, are balanced appropriately. Ur done.
Also, would it be possible to sort of compress/combine all the parts in the plane into one 3D model to reduce high part count lag, and then maybe decompress to add more parts or edit the build?
@AircraftExperimental WoT may not be the most historically or mechanically accurate, but it is able to explore how tank design could have progressed in both reasonable and unreasonable ways. We can enjoy all the possible designs that could have been made.
Lol. Have an upvote
Here's an upvote. The only problem is I think the plane doesn't have enough engine, and would've been massively underpowered irl.
Hey!!! It's posted! I remember seeing this in SP MP. I believe I was flying some weird tester simple bomber aircraft.
+1I know PEAs have pretty low part counts, and I think they have their niche. But imo, people like MisterT or BogdanX (he's probably not around anymore) are kings of when quality meats quantity, lower part quantity of course. BogdanX had a superb Bronco that was 650 parts and you'd think it was 1000. And MisterT's Superbmarine Spitfires (pun intended) are absolute performance beauties at 990 parts for what look like 1250 part builds. Of course, not everyone can run those high "low" part counts, and that's where PEAs come in. But overall those old pros were it when it came to beauty and part efficiency.
+1@PapaKernels XD
@AWESOMENESS360 True, I just feel bad for dissing ppl
@overlord5453 Older ;)
@SILVERPANZER Only about 3 of them ahaha. And even then not that high quality.
@PapaKernels Oh they happen haha. But Euro sports are no easy pushover either. They're quite tough.
@PapaKernels Hmm... Well, Europeans like making sports "fancy". Murica keeps things down to earth, in this case of dirt cars, literally. Ahahahah.
+1Bro should not be getting this much upvotes for 100 parts... have mine.
I am waiting to download this mod but will have to wait until it is fixed. Please fix it!
@Walker92369 ehh, but this specific fokker was german flown.
Genius
Turning left: The weird American obsession. Here's an upvote.
@WritersCrusadersAirCo2 I'm joking... mostly. Or am I? Ahahaha. Although PC is a lot more flexible, it's not 100% a must so no pressure lol.
+1Man, just get a PC already, yank up the part counts, switch on reshade, use tracks mod.
Jokes aside, nice tank!
P.S. Get a PC already
+1Reminds me of MrEarth's F11 Tiger, very top notch build.
+1@reimuuuua Yeah, no doubt it's your build. I cross checked RussianAce's and it looks different.
Reminds me of my tank which I believe is much larger, although still liftable by C-130 Hercules.
How is this curated bruh?
@UseGooglePlay Also, thanks so much for the upvotes mate!
+1@UseGooglePlay No probs mate, I'm glad you're happy. Maybe we can collab, yeah, I have some plans, although not much time to play SP at the moment.
+1I might join, I might not join, but I want to join ; )
+2@Rymanx03 I used to do that once in a while, makes people happy.
Congratulations on platinum
+1@Luke1224 Yaw don't exist on fkying wings the way they do on regular planes.
Enjoy blackness mate.
Congratulations on Platinum my man. It will probably take a bit of time to update ur color on the website.
In my opinion, Juno is fantastic, with much possibility for flying stuff and doing weird s* in space. Its builder has its own charm and flexibility and advantages as well. On the other hand, SP, it's builder system and even its bugs are more well suited to things like building tanks (which I love) or insanely detailed craft. On Juno, the graphics are part of the game, in SP, we build the graphics. Tbh, SP is better suited to creating eye pleasing stuff while Juno is better for flying things.
@Hiiamhere It flies?
@dekanii You probably have... I feel like this is based on Russian Ace's E. 100, but the part count is too low, so idk if it's stolen.
+1Create a bit at the back with a useable artillery gun (3, 6, or 8 inch). You can probably use more AG grps, and some either or programming on those grps so that when u switch from mobility to gun modes, the other half doesn't move haha. I remember trying to build a Strv 103 style tank, and I had gotten the controls to be pretty much point and shoot using SP on PC, it used AG grps to switch between driving and firing modes.
+1@overlord5453 The mods r pretty much ded, the website is halfway ded too.
@WritersCrusadersAirCo2 nice. T-34's turret style (depending on model) has been a headache for me to create a technique.
+1@overlord5453 We could always report it kekw
YESSS - One of the best tank creators on SP
+1If you need to know how to make russian styled turret's I have one of their designs
+1Idk, I feel this post shld have been slapped down by mods long ago for its child unfriendly descriptions... but... here's an upvote?
+1@YOURGORILLA1246 Use wings (fill them with fuel), fuselage blocks, the long turbo jet engine, air intakes, make sure the CoT, CoM, and CoL, are balanced appropriately. Ur done.
Also, would it be possible to sort of compress/combine all the parts in the plane into one 3D model to reduce high part count lag, and then maybe decompress to add more parts or edit the build?
+2Will XML overload still be here? And what about other mods? Like tracks two for example? (Will SP2 have a better version of of tracks2 built in?)
+1@Randomplayer Ehh... in the more built version of this, I already cut it down to one barrel
Dang... Also, looks like char futur 4 from wot. It probably is XD
bruh, 253 parts, such awesome clean details, and the functionality.
Take my upvote
+1Awesome build
+1@JustDragon Yeah I heard that. How did u find this old post XD
@JustDragon Bow replied to my message 1.6 yrs ago, hek long time
Yasss the kaman!